Petsch, Jamie L.

Abstract Introduction: Iron deficiency (ID) is a global epidemic with discrepant definitions of both ID and anemia in pregnancy. Iron requirements increase during pregnancy and deficiencies should be corrected to avoid adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. Current guidelines recommend only screening for ID during pregnancy in the presence of anemia despite the global epidemic of ID in reproductive-age females and availability of ferritin as a high-value biomarker. To address this unmet need and gap in care, we implemented a standardized approach to screening and treating ID in pregnancy. Methods: In March 2024 at the ASH Quality Improvement Training Institute, our multidisciplinary team with representatives from hematology, obstetrics, anesthesiology, and patient blood management developed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to standardize an approach to screening and treating ID in pregnancy. After local dissemination and education of the standardized care pathway via patient/provider handouts and divisional presentations, obstetric providers paired ferritin testing with two standard hemoglobin assessments in early (8-12 weeks gestation) and late (24-28 weeks gestation) pregnancy to minimize lab draws and optimize logistics. The process was facilitated by modifying prenatal order sets in the electronic medical record. ID was defined as a ferritin <50 mcg/L and anemia was defined as a hemoglobin <11 g/dL. If ID was present in early pregnancy, oral iron supplementation was offered; if ID was present in late pregnancy, an IV iron infusion (low molecular weight iron dextran, 1 gram) was offered regardless of anemia status. Results: Obstetric data were captured pre-intervention from January 2023 – February 2024 (n=2097 pregnancies) and post-intervention from March 2024 – June 2025 (n=2429 pregnancies). Ferritin screening rates improved from 10% (205/2097) to 63% (1534/2429). Of those ferritin tests, 66% demonstrated ID in the pre-intervention cohort and 69% demonstrated ID in the post-intervention cohort. Anemia rates by measured hemoglobin during pregnancy were 25% in both the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts despite 92% having documentation of prenatal vitamins containing iron (PNV). Iron dextran infusion rates improved from 0.9% (18/2097) to 21% (507/2429). Of those receiving IV iron dextran, 39% had documentation of both PNV as well as additional oral iron supplementation. Overall, the median hemoglobin improved from 10.7 to 11.8 g/dL in those receiving IV iron dextran. This included increases from 12.0 to 12.8 g/dL in those without anemia and from 11.2 to 12.1 g/dL in those with ferritin 30-50 mcg/L after IV iron. Prior to initiation of this QI project, 3.1% of pregnancies (65/2097) required a blood transfusion during admission for delivery. After initiation of this project, 2.7% of pregnancies (65/2429) required a blood transfusion, of which 46 did not receive IV iron and 33 did not have a ferritin checked. Conclusions: ID in pregnancy is underrecognized and undertreated. Through a multidisciplinary QI initiative, screening for ID improved from 10% to over 60% of pregnancies within one year of project initiation. Over the same period, there was a 20-fold increase in the number of IV iron dextran infusions resulting in an increase in median hemoglobin by over 1 g/dL and a signal for decreased transfusion requirements. This occurred despite almost universal supplementation with a PNV. This standardized approach to screening and treating ID was performed by the obstetrics teams and could be implemented within varied practice models. Given the potential implications for reevaluation of appropriate reference ranges and equitable prenatal care globally, additional studies are warranted to better characterize ID in pregnancy as well as clinical sequelae for both mothers and infants. Simultaneously, discussions are needed around current guidelines and recommendations for both screening and treating ID in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is common and associated with adverse outcomes in surgical patients. There is limited information to guide the design and implementation of preoperative anemia clinics (PAC), which represents a critical barrier to entry for many practices. METHODS: This is a descriptive observational study highlighting the design and implementation of a multidisciplinary PAC, including key steps in planning, stakeholder engagement, organizational structure, identification of target populations, establishing anemia treatments, information technology and electronic health record integration, provider training, and data infrastructure. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and anemia treatments for individuals evaluated in the PAC from November 4, 2019 through September 15, 2023 are enumerated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessing changes in anemia symptoms and well-being after surgery are evaluated for 2 subsets of patients (one before PAC implementation [pre-PAC], another after PAC implementation [post-PAC]), without formal statistical comparison given limited sample sizes. RESULTS: The PAC was initiated as a multidisciplinary effort under support from a Mayo Clinic Practice Transformation Award in 2019, including broad representation from anesthesiology, surgery, and medical practices, along with institutional project management support (eg, project manager, information technologists, systems engineers). While initially limited to cardiac surgery patients, the PAC underwent planned incremental expansion to include other surgical services. Over the study period, 1188 PAC consultations across 1159 unique patients met eligibility criteria, with a median age of 66 (57–73) years and 58.1% women. The most common etiology of anemia was iron deficiency (69.1%) followed by anemia related to cancer (17.3%). Anemia-directed therapies were recommended in 1038 (87.4%) encounters, with 730 (70.3%) of those receiving recommended treatment preoperatively. Seven hundred nine (97.1%) treatments included intravenous iron and 146 (20.0%) included erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Fifteen pre-PAC and 38 post-PAC implementation patients completed PROs. PAC implementation was accompanied by earlier resolution of anemia symptoms and less pronounced declines in postoperative well-being scores. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the key steps for successful PAC implementation. Treatment is possible for most patients and may be accompanied by improvements in patient-important outcomes.

Introduction: There are discrepant definitions of both iron deficiency and anemia in pregnancy. It is recognized that iron requirements increase during pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester, and that deficiencies should be corrected to avoid adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. While low dose iron supplementation is recommended for all pregnant persons (ACOG Bulletin 233), dosing through prenatal vitamins varies widely. Additionally, despite the epidemic of iron deficiency in reproductive-age females globally and availability of high-value biomarkers (e.g., ferritin), current guidelines only recommend screening for iron deficiency during pregnancy in the presence of anemia. As anemia is the terminal manifestation of iron deficiency and reference ranges vary by organization, these guidelines and practices warrant further investigation and discussion. Methods: Retrospective review and analysis of the electronic health record at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) was performed for obstetric deliveries between June 2022 and May 2023. Iron deficiency was defined as a ferritin <50 mcg/L and anemia was defined as a hemoglobin <11 g/dL. Results: A total of 2,141 unique deliveries were identified. The median age at delivery was 31 years old (range: 15 - 45) with 82% identifying as white. Anemia was documented in 42% (n=904) of pregnancies at least once throughout gestation, with an increasing frequency of 2% (n=43) in the first trimester, 11% (n=230) in the second trimester, 17% (n=361) in the third trimester, and 38% (n=803) from admission for delivery through the peri-partum period. There were five documented pRBC transfusions prior to admission for delivery; however, from admission for delivery through the peri-partum period, there were a total of 102 documented pRBC transfusions. In total, 15% (n=318) of pregnancies were screened for iron deficiency through ferritin testing. Ferritin levels were measured 415 times with 23% (n=96) occurring between the last menstrual period and 12 weeks gestational age (WGA), 24% (n=100) occurring between 13-27 WGA, 40% (n=164) occurring between 28-40 WGA, and 13% (n=55) occurring post-partum. Iron deficiency was found in 70% (n=67), 79% (n=79), 80% (n=164), and 78% (n=43) of measured ferritin levels, respectively. Despite the paucity of screening, prescriptions for oral iron increased throughout gestation with supplementation in pregnancy for 8% (n=170) prior to 12 WGA, 14% (n=290) for those 13-27 WGA, and 23% (n=489) for those 28-40 WGA. Similarly, intravenous iron infusions increased throughout gestation with supplementation in pregnancy for 0.3% (n=7) prior to 12 WGA, 0.7% (n=16) for those 13-27 WGA, and 4% (n=95) for those 28-40 WGA. Prenatal vitamins were documented in over 90% of pregnancies throughout gestation, although the majority were non-prescription and contained variable amounts of elemental iron. Conclusions: Iron deficiency in pregnancy is underrecognized and undertreated. It follows that the accuracy of current reference ranges for anemia in pregnancy are suspect without rigorous verification of replete iron stores in the reference population. Given potential implications for blood product utilization and prenatal care, additional studies are warranted to better characterize iron deficiency in pregnancy as well as clinical sequelae for both mothers and infants. Simultaneously, discussions are needed around current guidelines and recommendations for both screening and treating iron deficiency in pregnancy. Providers, institutions, and professional societies should pursue pragmatic quality improvement initiatives and equitable healthcare delivery efforts to optimize care for this vulnerable patient population at high risk of iron deficiency.

AbstractBackgroundSome patients express concerns regarding receipt of allogeneic blood transfusions from donors potentially vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19). However, limited information exists about patients' expression of these concerns or how to address them during the blood transfusion consent process. In this study, we describe our experience of working collaboratively with patients with vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery, summarizing treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.Study Design and MethodsThis observational descriptive study includes patients seen in our Bloodless Medicine and Surgery clinic between June 2022 and June 2024 for vaccine‐related transfusion concerns prior to elective surgery. A shared decision‐making framework was employed to foster conversation, share information, provide reassurance, reconcile conflict, and match preferences with available care options. Patient characteristics, treatment decisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThirty‐five patients were included, with median (1st, 3rd quartile) age of 61 (53, 69) years. Cardiac surgery was the most common type of surgery (29%). Twelve patients (34%) were anemic preoperatively, and all received preoperative treatment. After discussion with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, 24 (68.6%) decided to consent to the use of all blood products, 5 (14.3%) accepted only red blood cells, and 6 (17.1%) declined all blood products. Among 28 patients undergoing surgery, only 4 (14%) received allogeneic transfusion perioperatively.ConclusionMany patients concerned about the vaccination status of blood donors may ultimately consent to allogeneic blood products after shared decision‐making with a Bloodless Medicine specialist, highlighting the importance of patient empowerment and collaborative care.