El‐Rifai, Rasha

ABSTRACT This study investigated the association between induction type and long‐term outcomes in kidney retransplant recipients who experienced graft loss due to BK virus–associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (2003–2021), we identified 277 adult kidney‐alone retransplant recipients with BKVAN‐related graft loss and categorized them by induction regimen: depletional ( n = 217) and nondepletional ( n = 60). The groups were similar overall, except the nondepletional cohort had lower panel‐reactive antibodies, a shorter time between transplants, and more live donor kidneys. Kaplan–Meier curves assessed 10‐year recipient and graft survival, and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for key donor and recipient factors, evaluated associations between induction type and outcomes. Rates of delayed graft function, one‐year rejection, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were comparable between groups. Ten‐year recipient and death‐censored graft survival did not differ by induction type (recipient survival: HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.43–2.77; p = 0.85; graft survival: HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.24–2.97; p = 0.79). Recurrent BKVAN‐related graft failure occurred only in the depletional group (5 of 217; 2.3%), while rejection‐related graft failure was more common in the nondepletional group (5 of 60; 8.3% vs. 6 of 217; 2.8%). Although these differences did not translate into long‐term graft survival disparities, they highlight the competing risks of viral recurrence and rejection. Thus, clinicians should interpret these results with caution and weigh the risks and benefits of induction choice in retransplant recipients with prior BKVAN, recognizing that this observational study cannot establish causality.

AbstractBackgroundThe HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) act afforded transplantation of organs from donors who have HIV. Herein we compared the long‐term outcomes of recipients with HIV by donor HIV testing status.MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all primary adult kidney transplant recipients who were HIV‐positive between 1/1/16‐12/31/21. Recipients were grouped into three cohorts according to the donor HIV status based on antibody (Ab) and nucleic acid testing (NAT): Donor Ab−/NAT− (n = 810), Donor Ab+ /NAT− (n = 98), and Donor Ab+/NAT+ (n = 90). We compared recipient and death‐censored graft survival (DCGS) by donor HIV testing status using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression, censored at 3 years posttransplant. Secondary outcomes were delayed graft function (DGF) and the following 1‐year outcomes: acute rejection, re‐hospitalization, and serum creatinine.ResultsIn Kaplan–Meier analyses, patient survival and DCGS were similar by donor HIV status (log rank p = .667; log rank p = .388). DGF occurred more frequently in donors with HIV Ab−/NAT− testing compared with Ab+/NAT− or Ab+/NAT+ testing (38.0% vs. 28.6% vs. 26.7%, p = .028). Average dialysis time before transplant was twice as long for recipients who received organs from donors with Ab−/NAT− testing (p < .001). Acute rejection, re‐hospitalization and serum creatinine at 12 months did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsPatient and allograft survival for recipients living with HIV remains comparable irrespective of donor HIV testing status. Utilizing kidneys from deceased donors with HIV Ab+/NAT− or Ab+/NAT+ testing shortens dialysis time prior to transplant. image