Wang, Hongkun

Abstract Background One in five adults aged 40 will develop heart failure (HF) during their lifetime. Risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, etc.) lead to structural and functional changes in cardiomyocytes, resulting in HF. At the cellular level, these changes consist of mis/over‐expression of genes that regulate cardiac identity (e.g., CamK2δ, PKC, Stat3, etc.). The current paradigm for treating HF is pharmacological or device‐based intervention; however, with few exceptions, the condition worsens with time. We are proposing to implement a change in HF treatment, shifting from a drug‐centric system to a cardiac target‐specific molecular approach that would reverse hypertrophy and adverse remodelling of affected cardiomyocytes. Methods A cardiomyocyte targeting peptide (CTP) was reversibly linked to miRNA106a for delivery to a mouse model of HF. Reversal of morphological, signalling, and physiological HF parameters was measured. Additionally, CTP‐miRNA106a was introduced into a human cardiomyocyte cell line to identify mechanism(s) at play for reversing HF characteristics (e.g., hypertrophy). Results Bio‐distribution studies showed that intravenously injected CTP‐miRNA106 delivered its cargo specifically to the heart within 30 min, followed by clearance of CTP from the heart to the kidneys, and to a lesser extent, the liver by 35 h with persistence of miRNA106a in cardiomyocytes until day 7 (the latest tested time‐point). CTP‐miRNA106a reversed angiotensin2/isoproterenol‐induced hypertrophy in 90% of the treated mice. We also identified two potential HF intracellular signalling pathways/mechanisms (PLCβ1/PKC/IP3 and NF‐κB) targeted by CTP‐miRNA106a that could benefit many pathophysiologies underlying HF, including inflammation. Conclusions CTP‐miRNA106a, a first‐of‐a‐kind cardiac‐specific drug, downregulates genes involved in cardiac hypertrophy and inflammation through the PLCβ1 and CamKIIδ kinase pathways. CTP delivery of miRNA106a cargo is specific to cardiomyocytes both in vitro and in vivo, and once delivered, many HF parameters, including hypertrophy, are reversed. Key points Cardiac Targeting Peptide (CTP) delivers, specifically to the heart, reversibly linked miRNA106a. MiRNA106a targets genes in various pathways known to cause heart failure when they are over/hyper activated returning their expression to normal levels. In vivo analyses using a mouse heart failure model resulted in reversal of heart failure parameters in 19/20 mice.

Abstract Purpose: Assessing impact of poor accrual on premature trial closure requires a relevant metric. We propose defining accrual sufficiency on apparent ability to address primary endpoints (PE) rather than attaining accrual targets. Experimental Design: All phase III trials open January 1, 1993, to December 31, 2002, by five U.S. oncology Clinical Trials Cooperative Groups (CTCG) were evaluated for accrual sufficiency and scientific results. Sufficient accrual included meeting accrual target, CTCGs documentation attesting adequate accrual, or conclusive results at interim analysis; insufficient accrual included poor accrual as cited closure reason or other reasons rendering a trial unable to address its primary endpoints. Closure rates based on our accrual sufficiency definition are compared with rates of meeting accrual targets and addressing the primary endpoints. A percentage of target accrual above which trials commonly answer the intended scientific question was identified to serve as an alternative to meeting full target accrual in designating accrual success. Results: Of 238 eligible trials, 158 (66%) closed with sufficient accrual. Among 80 trials with insufficient accrual, 70 (29%) closed specifically because of poor accrual. Inadequate accrual rates are overemphasized when defining accrual success solely by meeting accrual targets. Nearly 75% of trials conclusively addressed the primary endpoints with positive results in 39% of trials. Exceeding 80% of target accrual serves as a reliable proxy for answering the intended scientific question. Conclusions: Approximately one third of phase III trials closed with insufficient accrual to address the primary endpoints, primarily due to poor accrual. Defining accrual sufficiency broader than meeting accrual targets represents a fairer account of trial closures. Clin Cancer Res; 18(1); 256–62. ©2011 AACR.

Background Research on barriers to accrual has typically emphasized factors influencing participation after trial activation. Purpose We sought to identify factors influencing trial design and accrual predictions prior to trial activation associated with sufficient accrual. Methods A 30-question web-based survey was sent to the study chair and lead statistician for all 248 phase III trials open in 1993–2002 by five Clinical Trials Cooperative Groups. Questions addressed prior trial experience, trial design elements, accrual predictions, and perceived accrual influences. Accrual sufficiency categorization was derived from Clinical Trials Cooperative Group records: sufficient accrual included trials closed with complete accrual or at interim analysis, insufficient accrual included trials closed with inadequate accrual. Responses were analyzed by respondent role (study chair/lead statistician) and accrual sufficiency. Results Three hundred and nine eligible responses were included (response rate, 63%; lead statisticians, 81%; and study chairs, 45%), representing trials with sufficient (63%) and insufficient accruals (37%). Study chair seniority or lead statistician experience was not linked to accrual sufficiency. Literature review, study chair's personal experience, and expert opinion within Clinical Trials Cooperative Group most commonly influenced control arm selection. Clinical Trials Cooperative Group experience most influenced accrual predictions. These influences were not associated with accrual sufficiency. Among respondents citing accrual difficulties (41%), factors negatively influencing accrual were not consistently identified. Respondents credited three factors with positively influencing accrual: clinical relevance of study, lack of competing trials, and protocol paralleling normal practice. Limitations Perceptions of lead statisticians and study chairs may not accurately reflect accrual barriers encountered by participating physicians or patients. Survey responses may be subject to recall bias. Conclusion Consistent factors explaining poor accrual were not identified, suggesting reasons for poor accrual are not well understood and warrant further study. Alternate strategies for accrual prediction are needed since Clinical Trials Cooperative Group experience is linked to successful and unsuccessful accrual.

Background A major challenge for randomized phase III oncology trials is the frequent low rates of patient enrollment, resulting in high rates of premature closure due to insufficient accrual. Purpose We conducted a pilot study to determine the extent of trial closure due to poor accrual, feasibility of identifying trial factors associated with sufficient accrual, impact of redesign strategies on trial accrual, and accrual benchmarks designating high failure risk in the clinical trials cooperative group (CTCG) setting. Methods A subset of phase III trials opened by five CTCGs between August 1991 and March 2004 was evaluated. Design elements, experimental agents, redesign strategies, and pretrial accrual assessment supporting accrual predictions were abstracted from CTCG documents. Percent actual/predicted accrual rate averaged per month was calculated. Trials were categorized as having sufficient or insufficient accrual based on reason for trial termination. Analyses included univariate and bivariate summaries to identify potential trial factors associated with accrual sufficiency. Results Among 40 trials from one CTCG, 21 (52.5%) trials closed due to insufficient accrual. In 82 trials from five CTCGs, therapeutic trials accrued sufficiently more often than nontherapeutic trials (59% vs 27%, p = 0.05). Trials including pretrial accrual assessment more often achieved sufficient accrual than those without (67% vs 47%, p = 0.08). Fewer exclusion criteria, shorter consent forms, other CTCG participation, and trial design simplicity were not associated with achieving sufficient accrual. Trials accruing at a rate much lower than predicted (<35% actual/predicted accrual rate) were consistently closed due to insufficient accrual. Limitations This trial subset under-represents certain experimental modalities. Data sources do not allow accounting for all factors potentially related to accrual success. Conclusion Trial closure due to insufficient accrual is common. Certain trial design factors appear associated with attaining sufficient accrual. Defining accrual benchmarks for early trial termination or redesign is feasible, but better accrual prediction methods are critically needed. Future studies should focus on identifying trial factors that allow more accurate accrual predictions and strategies that can salvage open trials experiencing slow accrual. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: 312—321. http://ctj.sagepub.com