Reis, Pedro Cotta Abrahão

Abstract Background Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes for patients with ER+/HER2− breast cancer. Nevertheless, they differ from each other in terms of chemical, biological, and pharmacological features, as well as toxicity profiles. We aim to determine whether QTc prolongation is caused by CDK4/6i in general or if it is associated with ribociclib only. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the prevalence of QTc prolongation as an adverse event in HR+ breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6i vs those without CDK4/6i. We pooled relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the binary endpoint of QT prolongation. Results We included 14 RCTs comprising 16 196 patients, of whom 8576 underwent therapy with CDK4/6i. An increased risk of QTc prolongation was associated with the use of CDK4/6i (RR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.67 to 3.29, P < .001; I2 = 44%). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant increase in the QTc interval for the ribociclib and palbociclib cohorts. The ribociclib subgroup showed a relative risk of 3.12 (95% CI = 2.09 to 4.65, P < .001; I2 = 12%), whereas the palbociclib subgroup had a relative risk of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.05 to 2.15, P = .025; I2 = 0%). Conclusion Palbociclib was associated with QTc prolongation; however, the relative risk for any grade QTc was quantitively twice with ribociclib. Furthermore, grade 3 QTc prolongations were observed exclusively with ribociclib. These results are important for guiding clinical decision-making and provide reassurance regarding the overall safety profile of this drug class.

OBJECTIVE In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor’s location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%–84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%–87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion–based radiotherapy, 85% (82%–88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion–based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59–2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%–45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%–45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%–100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion–based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%–100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion–based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%–90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%–85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion–based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%–86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%–91%, 189 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.

Abstract Introduction: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), such as abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, have significantly improved outcomes for patients with ER+/HER2− breast cancer. Nevertheless, they differ among each other in terms of chemical, biological, and pharmacological features, as well as toxicity profiles. Ribociclib causes concentration-dependent increases in the QTc interval, particularly in combination with tamoxifen. However, the pathogenesis of ribociclib-induced QTc prolongation remains unclear. We aim to determine whether QTc prolongation is caused by CDK4/6i in general or if it is associated with ribociclib only. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare QTc prolongation in patients using CDK4/6i in combination with hormonal agents to patients that did not use CDK4/6i, including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic scenarios in breast cancer. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2023. The outcomes evaluated were QTc prolongation of all grades. Statistical analysis was performed with R software version 2023.03.0+386. Results: We included 14 RCTs comprising 16,013 patients in the quantitative analysis, of whom 8,585 underwent therapy with CDK4/6i, and one more paper was included only in the qualitative analysis due to not reporting the exact number of events of QTc prolongation. An increased risk of QTc prolongation was associated with the use of CDK4/6i (RR 2.32; 95% CI 1.67–3.23; p=0.000001; I²=46%). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant increase in the QTc interval for the ribociclib and palbociclib cohorts. The ribociclib subgroup showed a risk ratio of 3.07 (RR 3.07; 95% CI 2.17-4.36; p&lt; 0.000001; I² = 21%) while the palbociclib subgroup had a risk ratio of 1.52 (RR 1.51; 95% CI 1.05-2.16; p=0.025, I²=0%). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QTc prolongation may be a common adverse effect of CDK4/6i, with ribociclib carrying greater risk. These results are important for guiding clinical decision-making, and further investigation is warranted to better understand the mechanisms and clinical implications of CDK4/6 i-induced QTc prolongation. Citation Format: Bruno Carvalho, Pedro Cotta Abrahão Reis, Alice Marinho, Ana Carolina Comini, Debora Xavier, Beatriz Mella S. Pessoa, Felipe Batalini. QTc prolongation as Adverse Effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-12-08.

e24049 Background: Vulvo-Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) or Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) is a common condition among breast cancer (BC) patients, especially those undergoing antiestrogen therapy. Despite being an option in refractory cases, the safety of hormonal treatment remains uncertain in this population. The aim of this study was to review the safety and serum estrogen levels of hormonal therapy in patients with BC history presenting with VVA symptoms. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing different hormonal treatment options for VVA in breast cancer survivors. Statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model and heterogeneity using Cochran's Q-statistic and the I2 index. Results: We included 17 studies, of which 5 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment modalities included in this study were topical vaginal estradiol and estriol preparations, vaginally applied testosterone, DHEA, and ospemifene. We found that, among patients treated with the estriol and estradiol preparations, there was an average increase of 7.67pg/ml (SMD 7.67 pg/mL; 95% CI -1.00, 16.35; p < 0.001). Analysis of the testosterone group found temporary peaks of serum estradiol levels, but one study showed persistent elevation above normal postmenopausal levels. One study with prasterone revealed no elevation of serum estradiol concentration. One study with ospemifene demonstrated no increase in the risk of BC recurrence. Conclusions: In conclusion, among treatments available for BC survivors, low-dose vaginal estrogen showed the smallest changes in serum estradiol levels and had the most evidence, but safety remains unclear, especially for patients on aromatase inhibitors. Alternative treatments such as ospemifene need more data supporting safety and efficacy. These results suggest that concerns related to cancer recurrence should keep aiming for the lowest possible concentration.