Comini, Ana Carolina

Abstract Introduction: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), such as abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, have significantly improved outcomes for patients with ER+/HER2− breast cancer. Nevertheless, they differ among each other in terms of chemical, biological, and pharmacological features, as well as toxicity profiles. Ribociclib causes concentration-dependent increases in the QTc interval, particularly in combination with tamoxifen. However, the pathogenesis of ribociclib-induced QTc prolongation remains unclear. We aim to determine whether QTc prolongation is caused by CDK4/6i in general or if it is associated with ribociclib only. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare QTc prolongation in patients using CDK4/6i in combination with hormonal agents to patients that did not use CDK4/6i, including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic scenarios in breast cancer. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2023. The outcomes evaluated were QTc prolongation of all grades. Statistical analysis was performed with R software version 2023.03.0+386. Results: We included 14 RCTs comprising 16,013 patients in the quantitative analysis, of whom 8,585 underwent therapy with CDK4/6i, and one more paper was included only in the qualitative analysis due to not reporting the exact number of events of QTc prolongation. An increased risk of QTc prolongation was associated with the use of CDK4/6i (RR 2.32; 95% CI 1.67–3.23; p=0.000001; I²=46%). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant increase in the QTc interval for the ribociclib and palbociclib cohorts. The ribociclib subgroup showed a risk ratio of 3.07 (RR 3.07; 95% CI 2.17-4.36; p< 0.000001; I² = 21%) while the palbociclib subgroup had a risk ratio of 1.52 (RR 1.51; 95% CI 1.05-2.16; p=0.025, I²=0%). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QTc prolongation may be a common adverse effect of CDK4/6i, with ribociclib carrying greater risk. These results are important for guiding clinical decision-making, and further investigation is warranted to better understand the mechanisms and clinical implications of CDK4/6 i-induced QTc prolongation. Citation Format: Bruno Carvalho, Pedro Cotta Abrahão Reis, Alice Marinho, Ana Carolina Comini, Debora Xavier, Beatriz Mella S. Pessoa, Felipe Batalini. QTc prolongation as Adverse Effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-12-08.

e24049 Background: Vulvo-Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) or Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) is a common condition among breast cancer (BC) patients, especially those undergoing antiestrogen therapy. Despite being an option in refractory cases, the safety of hormonal treatment remains uncertain in this population. The aim of this study was to review the safety and serum estrogen levels of hormonal therapy in patients with BC history presenting with VVA symptoms. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing different hormonal treatment options for VVA in breast cancer survivors. Statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model and heterogeneity using Cochran's Q-statistic and the I2 index. Results: We included 17 studies, of which 5 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment modalities included in this study were topical vaginal estradiol and estriol preparations, vaginally applied testosterone, DHEA, and ospemifene. We found that, among patients treated with the estriol and estradiol preparations, there was an average increase of 7.67pg/ml (SMD 7.67 pg/mL; 95% CI -1.00, 16.35; p < 0.001). Analysis of the testosterone group found temporary peaks of serum estradiol levels, but one study showed persistent elevation above normal postmenopausal levels. One study with prasterone revealed no elevation of serum estradiol concentration. One study with ospemifene demonstrated no increase in the risk of BC recurrence. Conclusions: In conclusion, among treatments available for BC survivors, low-dose vaginal estrogen showed the smallest changes in serum estradiol levels and had the most evidence, but safety remains unclear, especially for patients on aromatase inhibitors. Alternative treatments such as ospemifene need more data supporting safety and efficacy. These results suggest that concerns related to cancer recurrence should keep aiming for the lowest possible concentration.

Abstract Background: Approximately 5% of breast cancer patients carry a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation, which leads malignant cells to be deficient in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks via homologous recombination. The poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are important on DNA single-strand break repair and PARP inhibitors (PARPi) cause an accumulation of unresolved DNA damage in tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations, resulting in cell death. However, because platinum salts also ultimately cause double-strand DNA breaks and may have overlapping mechanisms of resistance with PARPi, the efficacy of PARPi in patients with prior platinum therapy is unknown. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of PARPi in patients with BRCA1/2-related breast cancer and previous platinum exposure. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the efficacy of PARPi in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Two independent investigators identified double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included the subgroup of previous exposure to platinum. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for papers up to June 26, 2022. Data extraction from published reports and quality assessment were performed under Cochrane recommendations. Hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled, and a p-value of &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The software Review Manager 5.3 was selected for conducting the statistical analysis. The primary endpoint of interest was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Out of 2069 database results (487 on PubMed; 1376 on Embase; and 206 on Cochrane), 42 studies were selected for full review, and 4 RCTs, with a total of 249 patients, were included in the final investigation. The PARPi included were Olaparib, Talazoparib, Niraparib, and Veliparib. Pooled analysis showed that PARPi improved PFS in breast cancer patients with prior treatment with platinum-based therapy compared to the control group [HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; p = 0.03]. In comparison, the population without previous platinum exposure had a similar but slightly greater benefit from PARPi [HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005]. A subgroup analysis containing only the three randomized trials with PARPi monotherapy confirmed the central tendency favoring PARPi over physicians’ choice of single-agent chemotherapy in patients with prior platinum-therapy; however, because of small numbers and wide confidence interval it was not statistically significant [HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; p = 0.06]. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PARPi are associated with longer PFS in patients with advanced breast cancer and previous exposure to platinum therapy, decreasing the concerns about cross-resistance between the drug classes. Nonetheless, more extensive studies are still necessary to investigate the efficacy of PARPi in patients with prior platinum exposure and truly platinum-resistant disease. Progression-free survival of included studies Citation Format: Alice D. Marinho, Beatriz Mella S. Pessoa, Gabriela R. Brandao, Caroliny H. Da Silva, Pedro A. Reis, Ana Carolina M. Comini, Felipe Batalini. Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors in Patients With BRCA1/2-related Breast Cancer with Prior Platinum Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-08.