Back to Authors

Dean, Robert A.

Mayo Clinic

Eli Lilly (United States)

Citations 4

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 Biomarker Core: A review of progress and plans
Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Toledo, Jon B. , Blennow, Kaj , Waligórska, Teresa, Brylska, Magdalena, Fields, Leona, Shah, Nirali, Soares, Holly , Dean, Robert A., Vanderstichele, Hugo, Petersen, Ronald C. , Aisen, Paul , Saykin, Andrew J. , Weiner, Michael W. , Trojanowski, John Q. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Kang, Ju‐Hee , Zetterberg, Henrik , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Saykin, Andrew J

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 17, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 772-791

10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.003 Get It

AbstractIntroductionWe describe Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Biomarker Core progress including: the Biobank; cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ1–42), t‐tau, and p‐tau181 analytical performance, definition of Alzheimer's disease (AD) profile for plaque, and tangle burden detection and increased risk for progression to AD; AD disease heterogeneity; progress in standardization; and new studies using ADNI biofluids.MethodsReview publications authored or coauthored by ADNI Biomarker core faculty and selected non‐ADNI studies to deepen the understanding and interpretation of CSF Aβ1–42, t‐tau, and p‐tau181 data.ResultsCSF AD biomarker measurements with the qualified AlzBio3 immunoassay detects neuropathologic AD hallmarks in preclinical and prodromal disease stages, based on CSF studies in non‐ADNI living subjects followed by the autopsy confirmation of AD. Collaboration across ADNI cores generated the temporal ordering model of AD biomarkers varying across individuals because of genetic/environmental factors that increase/decrease resilience to AD pathologies.DiscussionFurther studies will refine this model and enable the use of biomarkers studied in ADNI clinically and in disease‐modifying therapeutic trials.
Revisiting the framework of the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria
Carrillo, María C. , Dean, Robert A., Nicolas, François, Berman, Robert , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Bain, Lisa J. , Schindler, Rachel, Miller, David S. , Knopman, David S.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | November 14, 2013 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 594-601

10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1762 Get It

Abstract In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association (NIA‐AA) proposed revising the criteria for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD), which had been established more than 25 years earlier by the National Institute on Neurologic and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA), now called the Alzheimer's Association. The NIA‐AA initiative also built upon research criteria for AD proposed by the International Working Group (IWG) in 2007 and updated in 2010. These efforts to revise the criteria reflect the need to improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate clinical trials, and establish a common set of criteria that are universally accepted across domains of clinical practice, research, and drug development. To ensure that the proposed NIA‐AA criteria remain as current as possible, the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened a meeting in Washington, DC, on October 1 and 2, 2012, bringing together international stakeholders from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies to identify areas of agreement and research gaps respective of NIA‐AA criteria and IWG recommendations.
P4‐054: First Multicenter Qualification of an Assay (INNO‐BIA Plasma Aß Forms Assay) for Measurement of ß‐amyloid Proteins as Part of US‐ADNI Efforts for Biomarker Qualification
Vanderstichele, Hugo, Desmaretz, Christel, Blennow, Kaj , Dean, Robert A., Blankenstein, Rien A., Holzman, Dave, Savage, Mary J., Soarez, Holly, Younkin, Steve, Trojanowski, John Q. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Lewczuk, Piotr , Verbeek, Marcel M. , Buée, Luc

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 26, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4S_Part_20 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2010.08.114 Get It

Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects
Trojanowski, John Q. , Vandeerstichele, Hugo, Korecka, Magdalena , Clark, Christopher M. , Aisen, Paul , Petersen, Ronald C. , Blennow, Kaj , Soares, Holly , Simon, Adam J., Dean, Robert A., Siemers, Eric , Potter, William Z., Weiner, Michael W. , Jack, Clifford R. , Jagust, William J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Lewczuk, Piotr , Toga, Arthur W. , Lee, Virginia M.‐Y. , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Jack, Clifford R

Alzheimer's & Dementia | May 7, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 230-238

10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.008 Get It

Here, we review progress by the Penn Biomarker Core in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) toward developing a pathological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma biomarker signature for mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as a biomarker profile that predicts conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or normal control subjects to AD. The Penn Biomarker Core also collaborated with other ADNI Cores to integrate data across ADNI to temporally order changes in clinical measures, imaging data, and chemical biomarkers that serve as mileposts and predictors of the conversion of normal control to MCI as well as MCI to AD, and the progression of AD. Initial CSF studies by the ADNI Biomarker Core revealed a pathological CSF biomarker signature of AD defined by the combination of Aβ1‐42 and total tau (T‐tau) that effectively delineates mild AD in the large multisite prospective clinical investigation conducted in ADNI. This signature appears to predict conversion from MCI to AD. Data fusion efforts across ADNI Cores generated a model for the temporal ordering of AD biomarkers which suggests that Aβ amyloid biomarkers become abnormal first, followed by changes in neurodegenerative biomarkers (CSF tau, F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) with the onset of clinical symptoms. The timing of these changes varies in individual patients due to genetic and environmental factors that increase or decrease an individual's resilience in response to progressive accumulations of AD pathologies. Further studies in ADNI will refine this model and render the biomarkers studied in ADNI more applicable to routine diagnosis and to clinical trials of disease modifying therapies.