Back to Authors

Wang, Yi

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-8526

Mayo Clinic

Cornell University

Citations 2

Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro‐magnetic tissue properties study group
Bilgiç, Berkin , Costagli, Mauro , Chan, Kwok‐Shing , Duyn, Jeff H. , Lee, Jongho , Li, Xu , Liu, Chunlei , Marques, José P. , Schweser, Ferdinand , Straub, Sina , Group, ISMRM Electro‐Magnetic Tissue Properties Study, Bilgic, Berkin , Costagli, Mauro , Chan, Kwok-Shing , Langkammer, Christian , Lee, Jongho , Li, Xu , Liu, Chunlei , Marques, José P , Robinson, Simon Daniel , Schweser, Ferdinand , Shmueli, Karin , Spincemaille, Pascal , Straub, Sina , Milovic, Carlos , Spincemaille, Pascal , Zijl, Peter C.M. van , Wang, Yi , Group, ISMRM Electro‐Magnetic Tissue Properties Study

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | January 22, 2024 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1834-1862

10.1002/mrm.30006 Get It

AbstractThis article provides recommendations for implementing QSM for clinical brain research. It is a consensus of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Electro‐Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group. While QSM technical development continues to advance rapidly, the current QSM methods have been demonstrated to be repeatable and reproducible for generating quantitative tissue magnetic susceptibility maps in the brain. However, the many QSM approaches available have generated a need in the neuroimaging community for guidelines on implementation. This article outlines considerations and implementation recommendations for QSM data acquisition, processing, analysis, and publication. We recommend that data be acquired using a monopolar 3D multi‐echo gradient echo (GRE) sequence and that phase images be saved and exported in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and unwrapped using an exact unwrapping approach. Multi‐echo images should be combined before background field removal, and a brain mask created using a brain extraction tool with the incorporation of phase‐quality‐based masking. Background fields within the brain mask should be removed using a technique based on SHARP or PDF, and the optimization approach to dipole inversion should be employed with a sparsity‐based regularization. Susceptibility values should be measured relative to a specified reference, including the common reference region of the whole brain as a region of interest in the analysis. The minimum acquisition and processing details required when reporting QSM results are also provided. These recommendations should facilitate clinical QSM research and promote harmonized data acquisition, analysis, and reporting.
QSM Throughout the Body
Dimov, Alexey , Li, Jiahao , Nguyen, Thanh D. , Roberts, Alexandra , Spincemaille, Pascal , Straub, Sina , Zun, Zungho , Prince, Martin R. , Wang, Yi , Dimov, Alexey V , Roberts, Alexandra G , Spincemaille, Pascal , Straub, Sina

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | February 7, 2023 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1621-1640

10.1002/jmri.28624 Get It

Magnetic materials in tissue, such as iron, calcium, or collagen, can be studied using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). To date, QSM has been overwhelmingly applied in the brain, but is increasingly utilized outside the brain. QSM relies on the effect of tissue magnetic susceptibility sources on the MR signal phase obtained with gradient echo sequence. However, in the body, the chemical shift of fat present within the region of interest contributes to the MR signal phase as well. Therefore, correcting for the chemical shift effect by means of water‐fat separation is essential for body QSM. By employing techniques to compensate for cardiac and respiratory motion artifacts, body QSM has been applied to study liver iron and fibrosis, heart chamber blood and placenta oxygenation, myocardial hemorrhage, atherosclerotic plaque, cartilage, bone, prostate, breast calcification, and kidney stone.