Rames, Jess D.

AbstractBackgroundAs heart transplant guidelines evolve, the clinical indication for 73% of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants is now destination therapy. Although completely magnetically levitated LVAD devices have demonstrated improved durability relative to previous models, LVAD replacement procedures are still required for a variety of indications. Thus, the population of patients with a replaced LVAD is growing. There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes and risk factors for those patients receiving first‐time LVAD replacements.MethodsThe study cohort consisted of all consecutive patients between 2006 and 2020 that received a first‐time LVAD replacement at a single institution. Preoperative clinical and laboratory variables were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was death or need for an additional LVAD replacement. Data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analyses.ResultsIn total, 152 patients were included in the study, of which 101 experienced the primary endpoint. On multivariate analysis, patients receiving HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVADs as the replacement device showed superior outcomes (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.065–0.35, p < 0.0001). Independent risk factors for death or need for additional replacement included preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (HR 4.44, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.00042), increased number of sternotomies (HR 5.20, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.0016), and preoperative mechanical ventilation (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01–3.86, and p = 0.045).ConclusionsReplacement with HM3 showed superior outcomes compared to all other pump types when controlling for both initial pump type and other independent predictors of death or LVAD replacement. Preoperative ECMO, mechanical ventilation, and multiple sternotomies also increased the odds for death or the need for subsequent replacement.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of a health maintenance reminder (HMR) on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine administration and completion across different age, insurance, and race cohorts.Study DesignRetrospective pre‐post analysis.SettingAcademic primary care.MethodsPatients aged 9 to 26 who had initiated the HPV vaccine series from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed, based on current age‐based standards. The cohort was divided based on vaccine uptake before and after the implementation of the HMR program in February 2020. The multivariate analysis estimated the odds of vaccine completion based on sociodemographic factors, and variable interactions were investigated to determine independent associations between sociodemographic factors and HMR implementation.ResultsThere were 7654 individual patients (mean age was 15.8 years; 46.7 were males; and 50.7% were white). HPV vaccine completion rates increased post‐HMR implementation by 59.2% (37% pre‐, and 58.9% post‐HMR; p < .001) in the entire cohort. Overall, black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.70) and patients ≥18 years (aOR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.15) were significantly less likely to complete their vaccine series; however, this improved significantly following HMR in these groups (p < .001). Post‐HMR, race, and insurance status were not independently associated with disparate vaccine completion rates, however, age was, and patients ≤14 or younger had higher odds of vaccine completion (aOR = 3.54; 95% CI: 2.91, 4.32).ConclusionThe implementation of an HMR was associated with increased HPV vaccine uptake across age and race groups in this single‐institution study. Future research should explore barriers to implementing HMRs in different health care settings.