Katz, Jason N.

Background The pathophysiology of CS is complex and is associated with increased inflammation and impaired vascular tone. Corticosteroids are recommended in septic shock and have been proposed as a potential treatment for other types of shock. Objectives We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with early corticosteroid use in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods Using a nationally representative database including over 1000 hospitals, we identified adults ≥18 years of age admitted from 2015–2023 with a diagnosis of CS. Patients with adrenal insufficiency, chronic rheumatologic conditions, COVID-19 infection and acute COPD exacerbation were excluded. Using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), we assessed for the association of receiving early corticosteroids (within the first 2 days of admission) versus no early corticosteroids and in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 167,721 identified patients with CS, the mean (SD) age was 65.5 (±15.2) years and 35.0% were women. A total of 13.2% received any corticosteroid within the first 2 days of admission. The most common corticosteroid was hydrocortisone (73.9%). Mortality for those receiving and not receiving early corticosteroids was 48.8% and 29.6% ( p < 0.001), respectively. After IPTW, early corticosteroid use remained associated with a 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4% to 3.8%, p < 0.001) higher mortality. Among patients with CS and concomitant sepsis, 27.6% received early corticosteroids, which was similarly associated with a higher mortality (weighted mean 5.8% [95% CI: 4.6% to 7.0%, p < 0.001]). Conclusions Approximately 1 in 7 patients with CS received corticosteroids early during their admission, which was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

AbstractBackgroundAs heart transplant guidelines evolve, the clinical indication for 73% of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants is now destination therapy. Although completely magnetically levitated LVAD devices have demonstrated improved durability relative to previous models, LVAD replacement procedures are still required for a variety of indications. Thus, the population of patients with a replaced LVAD is growing. There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes and risk factors for those patients receiving first‐time LVAD replacements.MethodsThe study cohort consisted of all consecutive patients between 2006 and 2020 that received a first‐time LVAD replacement at a single institution. Preoperative clinical and laboratory variables were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was death or need for an additional LVAD replacement. Data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analyses.ResultsIn total, 152 patients were included in the study, of which 101 experienced the primary endpoint. On multivariate analysis, patients receiving HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVADs as the replacement device showed superior outcomes (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.065–0.35, p < 0.0001). Independent risk factors for death or need for additional replacement included preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (HR 4.44, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.00042), increased number of sternotomies (HR 5.20, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.0016), and preoperative mechanical ventilation (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01–3.86, and p = 0.045).ConclusionsReplacement with HM3 showed superior outcomes compared to all other pump types when controlling for both initial pump type and other independent predictors of death or LVAD replacement. Preoperative ECMO, mechanical ventilation, and multiple sternotomies also increased the odds for death or the need for subsequent replacement.

Introduction and hypothesis: Recent data have indicated an increase in the rate of early, confirmed pump thrombosis of the HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device. Factors related to this increase were not known, but one of the hypotheses was change in clinical management over time. The PREVENT ( PREVEN tion of Heartmate II Pump T hrombosis through Clinical Management) study was designed to evaluate the impact of clinical practices developed to reduce the risk of HMII pump thrombosis. Methods: PREVENT is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, non-randomized study of up to 300 patients at up to 25 sites. Patient and pump management, including implant technique, anticoagulation, and pump settings are guided by protocol (Table 1). Primary endpoint is incidence of confirmed pump thrombosis at 3 months, with a total follow-up of 6 months. Presented here are the preliminary results from the first 100 subjects enrolled. Results: Median age was 61 years [25-79], 87% were male, and 79% were destination therapy. At implant, 9% were in INTERMACS Profile1, 68% Profiles 2-3, and 22% Profiles 4-7. Preliminary analysis of 90-day outcomes demonstrated an incidence of 1% for confirmed and 2% for suspected thrombosis with a 38% incidence of INTERMACS-defined bleeding. Adherence to the protocol recommendations was as follows: 91% of the pumps were anchored, 97% of the patients were bridged with heparin, median pump speed at 1 month was 9190 [range: 8400-10000], with 93% of the patients having a pump speed > 8600, and 78% of the patients having pump speeds > 9000. Median INR per patient was 2.2 [IQR: 2.0-2.4]. Overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 93%. Conclusions: Preliminary results are encouraging and suggest good adherence to the PREVENT protocol and low rates of pump thrombosis without a resultant increase in bleeding complications. Overall survival after HM II implantation remains excellent.