Validated nonbiopsy methods to assure duodenal mucosal healing in celiac disease are lacking, yet ongoing mucosal injury is associated with anemia, osteoporosis, and lymphoma. Most providers utilize clinical data as surrogates of mucosal status to avoid additional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The reliability of such surrogates to predict mucosal recovery has been incompletely evaluated. The aim of this study was to rigorously assess patterns of histologic mucosal recovery at follow-up in celiac disease and to correlate findings with clinical data. Gastrointestinal pathologists from 13 centers evaluated initial and follow-up duodenal biopsies from 181 celiac disease patients. Marsh scores and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs)/100 enterocytes were assessed blindly. Histology at follow-up was correlated with symptoms, immunoglobulin A anti–tissue transglutaminase titers and gluten-free diet adherence. Fifty-six/181 (31%) patients had persistent villous blunting and 46/181 (25%) patients had just persistently elevated IELs at follow-up, with only 79/181 (44%) patients having complete histologic remission. IEL normalization (82/181; 45%) lagged villous recovery (125/181;69%). In a minority of patients, villous blunting was limited to proximal duodenal biopsies. No correlation was found between Marsh scores and symptoms, normalization of immunoglobulin A anti–tissue transglutaminase serology, or diet adherence. Children showed greater recovery of Marsh score (P<0.001) and IELs (P<0.01) than adults. Persistent mucosal injury is common in celiac disease, with discordant villous/IEL normalization. Pathologist awareness of expected findings in celiac disease follow-up biopsies, including their frequent lack of correlation with clinical data, is important for patient management, and has implications for eligibility criteria for therapeutics currently in development.
Gene expression profiles in Hispanic patients with early-onset gastric cancer.
464 Background: A larger proportion of Hispanic gastric cancer patients are diagnosed at a young age than patients of other ethnicities. Despite diagnosis at an early age, young Hispanic patients also present more frequently with advanced disease. Whether there are molecular differences between tumors from young and old Hispanic gastric cancer patients is unknown. Methods: We performed RNA-sequencing on pre-treatment tumor samples of gastric cancer patients of self-identified Hispanic ethnicity. We stratified patients into two groups: <50 years and ≥50 years. Differentially expressed genes between groups were detected using the DESeq2 package (RStudio). We performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify pathways that were uniquely overexpressed in each age group. Results: 57 patients were included in our study. 23 patients were <50 years and 33 patients were ≥50 years. Comparison of the top 10% most differentially expressed genes showed no clustering based on age. However, visual inspection of the top 40 most differentially expressed genes revealed 2 distinct patterns of gene expression between age groups. GSEA revealed upregulation of DNA replication, cell cycle, and DNA repair pathways in the younger patients The tumors in younger patients also had upregulation of multiple immune activation pathways. Cancers from older patients had upregulation of programmed cell death pathways. Conclusions: Early-onset gastric cancer in Hispanic patients may represent a distinct biologic process.