Background Carotid artery tortuosity (CAT) may complicate mechanical thrombectomy (MT), potentially causing delays or preventing recanalization. However, the relationship between CAT and MT outcomes remains largely unexplored. This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing evidence regarding the impact of CAT on MT outcomes. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Studies providing data for MT outcomes based on CAT status were included. Outcomes of interest included successful recanalization, first-pass efficacy (FPE), procedure time, functional independence, and procedure-related complications. Results Our search identified nine studies with 2737 patients. Three studies employed DSA to assess tortuosity, whereas the remaining six studies preferred CTA. In seven studies, CAT was associated with prolonged procedure times. In five studies, successful recanalization rates were significantly lower in CAT patients as compared to patients with non-tortuous arteries. Two studies showed that CAT could alter FPE or successful recanalization rates of first-line MT techniques. No study found statistically significant relationships between CAT and functional independence. Three studies examined the association between CAT and safety outcomes, and only one study found increased intracranial hemorrhage rates in patients with CAT. All nine studies employed different CAT criteria. Conclusions Despite the vast MT literature, the number of studies reporting CAT status remains low. CAT may affect procedure time and technical outcomes of MT. Therefore, employing a uniform CAT definition and reporting CAT more frequently can provide insights into management of patients with acute large vessel occlusions.
Common design and data elements reported in active mechanical thrombectomy trials focusing on distal medium vessel occlusions and minor strokes: a systematic review
Background Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) and minor strokes represent emerging frontiers in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Although several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are underway, the design characteristics of these trials and the specific questions they aim to address have not been extensively explored. This current study sought to investigate the design and data elements reported in active prospective DMVO and minor stroke studies. Methods The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for ongoing prospective studies assessing the role of MT in patients with DMVOs or minor strokes. The Nested Knowledge AutoLit platform was utilized to categorize reported outcomes and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Frequencies of reported data elements were extracted from study protocols. Results A total of 10 (8 DMVO and 2 minor stroke) studies enrolling 3520 patients were included. All DMVO studies employ different criteria regarding target occlusion locations. Five DMVO studies use stent retrievers as the first-line thrombectomy technique (62.5%, 5/8), while three studies allow any MT techniques, generally at the operator’s discretion. Four DMVO studies permit intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) utilization in both intervention and control arms (50%, 4/8). The DISTALS trial excludes patients receiving IVT, while the DUSK trial and Tigertriever registry only enroll patients who are ineligible for IVT or for whom IVT failed to achieve reperfusion. DMVO studies exhibit notable heterogeneity in symptom onset duration thresholds for inclusion (<6 hours: 2 studies; <12 hours: 2 studies; <24 hours: 3 studies). Minor stroke trials employ similar inclusion criteria and outcome measures except for symptom duration thresholds for inclusion (8 hours for ENDOLOW and 23 hours for MOSTE). Conclusions There is considerable heterogeneity among active DMVO trials regarding potential target DMVO locations and time thresholds for inclusion based on the last known well time. Furthermore, our review indicates that the utility of aspiration thrombectomy in DMVOs and the advantages of MT without IVT over IVT alone will remain largely unexplored even after completion of active DMVO trials.
Embolization of arteriovenous malformations of head and neck: A systematic review
Background Cervicofacial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a significant source of morbidity. Endovascular embolization has emerged as a promising treatment technique for these lesions. However, current literature on cervicofacial AVM embolization mostly consists of single-agent oriented case series, and to date, no comprehensive study has compared the outcomes of available embolic agents. Purpose To investigate the performance of different embolic agents in the management of cervicofacial AVMs. Methods We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies providing data for the endovascular treatment of cervicofacial AVMs were included. The data regarding complication and cure rates were collected for each embolic agent. Pooled event rates were presented as descriptive statistics. Results Eleven studies comprising 204 patients were included in the review. The overall complete and partial cure rates were 62.2% (127/204) and 36.2% (74/204), respectively. Embolization failed to achieve significant improvement in only 1.6% (3/204) of the patients. The complete cure rates were 87.5% (75–100%) for n-Butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA, glue), 80.5% (61–100%) for Onyx (Medtronic, MN, USA), and 51.5% (18–85%) for ethanol. The overall complication rate was 30% (61/204). The complication rates were 33% (12.5–53%) for ethanol, 14% (0–28%) for Onyx, and 0% for NBCA. Conclusions Our systematic review supports that endovascular embolization is an effective treatment option for cervicofacial AVMs. In our review, the use of Onyx and NBCA was associated with consistently high complete cure rates and a promising safety profile. However, more research is needed to investigate the use of different embolic agents in the treatment of cervicofacial AVMs.
Under (back) pressure: Better collateral flow may facilitate clot removal in ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Collateral status may facilitate clot removal and affect rates of successful reperfusion following endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Papers which focused on collateral status and patients treated with EVT for AIS were included in our analysis. Outcomes of interest included collateral score grading, rates of successful reperfusion defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b-3 and onset to revascularization time. We calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on collateral status. Results 16 studies, with 6073 patients, were included in our analysis. Among the included studies, there were six different collateral grading scales, which were dichotomized into “good to moderate” and “poor” collaterals. Odds of successful reperfusion were significantly higher among patients with good to moderate collateral circulation compared to those with poor collaterals (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.09; P -value < 0.001); however, there was heterogeneity among included studies (I2 = 5 4%; P -value = 0.008). Onset to revascularization time was comparable between patients with good to moderate collateral circulation compared to those with poor collaterals (MD = 3.91 min; 95% CI = −8.71 to 16.53; P -value = 0.544); however, there was heterogeneity among included studies (I2= 60%; P -value = 0.014). Conclusions The presence of good collaterals may increase the odds of achieving successful reperfusion following EVT for AIS. Improved collateral flow was associated with improved angiographic outcomes, although future work is needed to determine if a causal relationship exists.
Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Thrombectomy for Stroke
Importance Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have been reported to experience worse outcomes compared with patients without AF. Objective To assess differences between patients with AF and their counterparts without AF treated with MT for AIS, focusing on safety outcomes, clinical outcomes, and baseline characteristics in both groups. Data Sources A systematic literature review of the English language literature from inception to July 14, 2022, was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Study Selection Studies that focused on patients with and without AF treated with MT for AIS were included. Multiple reviewers screened studies to identify studies included in analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline to ensure accuracy. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome of interest was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes of interest included rates of successful reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores of 2b to 3, 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and baseline patient characteristics. Results Of 1696 initially retrieved studies, 10 studies were included, with 6543 patients. Patients with AF were a mean of 10.17 (95% CI, 8.11-12.23) years older ( P &lt; .001) and had higher rates of hypertension (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.57-2.27]; P &lt; .001) and diabetes (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02-1.31]; P = .02). Overall, there were comparable rates of mRS scores of 0 to 2 between patients with AF and patients without AF (odds ratio [OR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.47-1.10]; P = .13), with significant heterogeneity among the included studies. After sensitivity analysis, the rate of mRS scores of 0 to 2 was significantly lower among patients with AF (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.81]; P &lt; .001). Successful reperfusion rates were similar between the groups (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.78-1.58]; P = .57). The rate of SICH was similar between groups (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.31]; P = .68). Mortality was significantly higher in the AF group (OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.12-1.92]; P = .005). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with AF experienced worse 90-day outcomes, even in the setting of similar rates of successful reperfusion. This was likely associated with greater age and greater rates of comorbidities among patients with AF.