Peng, Zhongwei

Abstract Background: The CaPTC prostate cancer (CaP) Familial Cohort study (CaPFCS) was launched in 2017 to explore the CaP risk factors of African Black men (ABM). The study design is a prospective study that observes and follows healthy ABM and ABM diagnosed with CaP. Aim: The specific aim is to provide recommendations on statistical considerations for cohort studies focused on cancer disparities, based on lessons learned from the CaPTC CaPFCS. Methodology: Study participants were ABM in Cameroon, Nigeria, and the US. Using validated measures, data were collected mostly by self-administered or research assistant administered survey using paper survey (especially in Cameroon and Nigeria) with the responses transferred to REDCap by research coordinators. The statistical analysis for the CaPTC CaPFCS focused on the baseline epidemiological, behavioral, clinical and anthropometric measures of Black men. A total of 819 participants were included in the analyses. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics (sample median, range, frequency and percentages) and unadjusted logistic regression models. Results: Data collection for the CaPTC CaPFCS were by multiple investigators/research coordinators at multiple sites in Cameroon, Nigeria, and the US. In preparation for the data analyses, we noted data entry errors and/or misinterpretation of data entry, which required extensive cleaning of the database prior to the analyses. The biostatisticians spent significant effort cleaning and ensuring data validity prior to the analyses. Confounding variables is another statistical consideration for cohort studies, such as the CaPTC CaPFCS. There was variability observed across age, education levels, employment status, household income and CaP diagnosis based on country of residence. CaP diagnosis was not reported by any of the ABM in the US, which may be due to the fact that they were all recruited within the community and no recruitment took place in the clinic. Finally, the CaPTC CaPFCS has several variables. Performing a lot of statistical tests may result in false-positive findings at P<0.05. Conclusion: The advantage of the CaPFCS is that it allows the CaPTC investigators to study epidemiological, behavioral, clinical and anthropometric variables associated with CaP over time. Being a longitudinal cohort study, investigators can track the changes in exposure and outcomes over time.However, statistical considerations need to be at the fore-front of multi-center, transatlantic cancer disparity studies such as the CaPTC CaPFCS, from data collection to data entry. The use of web-based survey with the ability to enter data directly into REDCaP will significantly reduce (if not totally eliminate) the need for database cleaning. There are multiple strategies that can be used to reduce confounder effect, including statistical adjustment and multivariate analysis to adjust for the confounders. The use of propensity score methods have especially been found to be effective in controlling baseline confounding factors. Citation Format: Daniel Lee, Michael Heckman, Zhongwei Peng, Emeka Iweala, Ademola Popoola, Paul Jibrin, Mohammed Faruk, Anthonia Sowumi, Omolara Fatiregun, Nkegoum Blaise, Catherine Oladoyinbo, Ifeoma Okoye, Abdulkadir Ayo Salako, Abidemi Omonisi, Iya Eze Bassey, Kayode Adeniji, Nggada Haruna Asura, Ernest Kaninjing, Oluwole Kukoyi, Fathi Parisa, Ruth Enuka, Oluwaseyi Toye, Jennifer Crook, CaPTC Investigators, Folakemi Odedina. Importance of statistical considerations in multi-center, transatlantic cancer disparity studies: Lessons learned from the CaPTC prostate cancer familial cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr C004.

AbstractBackgroundWe recently discovered a novel tau binding partner, SERPINA5, to be upregulated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and co‐localize with corticolimbic tau distribution. As tau pathology is also observed in primary tauopathies, we hypothesized that SERPINA5 burden would mirror tau burden in these diseases. Thus, we sought to define the relationship between SERPINA5 and tau in primary tauopathies and compare this relationship to AD.MethodImmunohistochemistry was performed on the hippocampus or cingulate in 4 groups (n=6 per disease group): 1) AD, 2) 3R+4R primary age‐related tauopathy, 3) 4R tauopathies (progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, argyrophilic grains disease), and 4) 3R tauopathy (Pick’s disease). Burden analyses for SERPINA5 and a phospho‐tau marker (AT8) were performed on digitized whole slide images.ResultVisual interpretation of SERPINA5 immunostaining identified both neuronal and glial inclusions that are commonly AT8‐positive in primary tauopathies. There were exceptions to this pattern such as SERPINA5‐positive Pick bodies being rarely observed. However, some pathologic structures, like ballooned neurons, were preferentially stained by SERPINA5. Quantitative analyses confirmed this observation with AT8 and SERPINA5 burden correlating in both the cingulate (R2=0.47, p<0.0001, Figure 1a) and hippocampus (R2=0.74, p<0.0001, Figure 1d). Nonparametric rank sum tests revealed majority of the primary tauopathies had less AT8 and SERPINA5 burden compared to AD in both the cingulate and hippocampus (Figure1b‐c, e‐f; Table 1).ConclusionSERPINA5 immunostaining patterns in primary tauopathies reflect tau immunostaining patterns. Our data suggests the SERPINA5‐tau interaction may not be specific for AD, which may implicate the role of SERPINA5 more broadly across tauopathies.