Dandu, Navya

Purpose To perform a prospective, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial to assess differences in integration and patient‐reported outcomes metrics (PROMs) of osteochondral allograft transplantation with and without bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation. Methods Patients (n = 36) undergoing osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee were consented and enrolled in this prospective study. They were randomized to either iliac crest BMAC or sham incision groups and blinded to their allocation. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of the knee were obtained at 6 months postoperatively after the index transplantation and graded by the semiquantitative assessment CT osteochondral allograft system. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Joint Replacement, were obtained at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Results On 6‐month postoperative CT scans, patients receiving BMAC‐treated grafts were more likely to have small cystic changes ( P = .01), with an associated trend toward reduction in large cyst formation ( P = .06), but equal osseous integration, graft signal density, and presence of discernible clefts and intra‐articular fragments. The BMAC group was less likely to undergo subsequent surgery for graft debridement or revision (5.3% vs 35.3%; P = .02). There were no significant differences in PROMs between the 2 groups preoperatively or postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years. Patients receiving BMAC trended toward a higher rate of achievement of Knee Documentation Committee and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Joint Replacement minimal clinically important difference (88% vs 55%; P = .076). Conclusions Patients receiving BMAC‐treated grafts were more likely to have small cystic changes and were less likely to undergo subsequent surgery for persistent or new symptoms after the index procedure. No difference in postoperative PROMs was shown at the 6‐month, 1‐year, and 2‐year follow‐ups between the 2 groups. Level of Evidence Level I, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is frequently indicated for recurrent lateral patellar instability. The preoperative presence and severity of a J-sign have been associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Purpose: To determine the underlying anatomic factors that contribute to the presence, severity, and jumping quality of the J-sign. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients undergoing evaluation for patellar instability at a single institution between 2013 and 2023 and healthy controls without patellar instability were included. Patients with a history of knee osteotomies were excluded. The presence of a jumping J-sign and its relationship to patellofemoral measures including the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), trochlear dysplasia (Dejour grade), tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, tibial tubercle lateralization, trochlear bump height, mechanical alignment, femoral anteversion, tibial torsion, trochlear medialization, patellar width, axial patellar/trochlear overlap, patellar height, trochlear height, and knee rotation angle (KRA) were measured using standardized 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Univariate pairwise and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with J-sign presence, severity, and quality. Results: Of the 130 knees with patellar instability, 89 (68.5%) demonstrated a J-sign on physical examination. In total, 44 (33.8%) patients demonstrated a 1-quadrant J-sign, 32 (24.6%) demonstrated a 2-quadrant smooth J-sign, and 13 (10.0%) demonstrated a jumping J-sign. A total of 22 control, noninstability cases were included. On multivariable analysis, increasing TT-TG distance (OR, 1.1 increase per millimeter; P = .04), external KRA (OR, 1.1 increase per degree; P = .02), and increasing CDI (OR, 1.3 increase per 0.1 increase in CDI; P = .02) were associated with J-sign presence. Increasing bump height (OR, 1.72 increase per millimeter; P = .007) and decreasing patellar width (OR, 0.89 decrease per millimeter; P = .076) were associated with a larger J-sign, when present. Increasing bump height (OR, 1.80 increase per millimeter; P = .018), increasing patellar width (OR, 1.33 increase per millimeter; P = .047), and decreasing CDI (OR, 0.009 decrease per 0.01 increase in ratio; P = .008) were associated with a jumping J-sign in comparison with a smooth 2-quadrant J-sign. A KRA of 10° (AUC, 0.70) and a cartilaginous bump height of 6.6 mm (AUC, 0.73) were thresholds associated with jumping J-sign presence. Conclusion: The presence of a J-sign is associated with MRI findings of relatively greater external tibiofemoral rotation, increased TT-TG distance, and increased patellar height, while J-sign severity and jumping quality are associated with the presence of additional underlying trochlear factors such as increased bump height. The anatomic drivers identified in this study should be further evaluated as possible factors associated with suboptimal outcomes after surgical management.

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is an excellent surgical option for patients with recurrent patellar instability. This technique has demonstrated significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, high rates of return to sport, and low rates of failure. However, there is debate regarding the use of isolated MPFLR in the setting of concomitant pathoanatomic features such as patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, or a lateralized tibial tubercle. Purpose: To estimate the overall relative effect sizes as well as strength of evidence supporting described risk factors for recurrent instability after isolated MPFLR. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid/MEDLINE databases were queried. Clinical studies for outcomes of isolated MPFLR reporting recurrent instability and associated risk factors were included. Data for each risk factor analyzed by at least 2 studies were extracted, and the heterogeneity of studies was determined by I 2 value. For variables evaluated in studies determined to have fair homogeneity, defined as I 2 <25%, DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were generated and effect sizes were represented as mean differences or odds ratios. Results: Nine studies examining risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFLR were identified, with 5 overlapping risk factors with low heterogeneity between studies: age, sex, tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), and trochlear dysplasia. There was strong evidence to support the risk of recurrent instability associated with CDI >1.3 (OR, 2.72; P = .02) and dysplasia with a trochlear bump (DeJour type B or D; OR, 3.28; P <.001). Age, sex, and TT-TG distance did not cause an increased risk of recurrent instability with currently available aggregate data. Conclusion: There are signs of increased risk of failure of isolated MPFLR in the setting of DeJour type B and D trochlear dysplasia and patella alta (CDI, >1.3). Currently available data suggest that age, sex, and TT-TG distance do not cause a higher risk of recurrence for patients undergoing isolated MPFLR.

Purpose To assess the consistency and quality of risk factor reporting for rotator cuff repair (RCR) retear and identify risk factors most frequently associated with retear. Methods A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of the initial 3,158 studies, a total of 31 met the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical studies regarding RCR failure, (2) arthroscopic procedures involving RCR, (3) reporting of clinical outcomes, (4) publication within the past 5 years, and (5) studies investigating preoperative risk factors for retear. After full‐text review, 18 risk factors were analyzed. Results The most consistently significant risk factors were acromiohumeral distance (80%), critical shoulder angle (67%), tear size (63%), anterior‐posterior dimension (60%), fatty infiltration (FI) (58%), and retraction size (56%). FI was analyzed using different methods among studies, with 63% finding significant results and 50% of all studies performing ordinal analysis. Tear size was inconsistently analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively, with 58% of studies finding significant results and 63% of all studies performing quantitative analysis. Risk factors consistently found to be nonsignificant included age, sex, diabetes mellitus, symptom duration, hand dominance, repair technique, smoking, and body mass index. Conclusions Tear size, FI, and retraction size were found to be significant risk factors in most of the included studies evaluating rotator cuff retear. Risk factors less likely reported as predictive included repair technique, age, sex, diabetes mellitus, symptom duration, hand dominance, repair technique, smoking, and body mass index. Risk factors that require further investigation include critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance, and anterior‐posterior tear dimension. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of Level III‐IV studies.

Background: While the biomechanical properties of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) have been well studied, there is no comprehensive summary of the biomechanics of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR). An accurate understanding of the kinematic properties and functional behavior of current techniques used in MPFLR is imperative to restoring native biomechanics and improving outcomes. Purpose: To provide a comprehensive review of the biomechanical effects of variations in MPFLR, specifically to determine the effect of graft choice and reconstruction technique. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria: (1) using ≥8 human cadaveric specimens, (2) reporting on a component of MPFLR, and (3) having multiple comparison groups. Results: Gracilis, semitendinosus, and quadriceps grafts demonstrated an ultimate load to failure (N) of 206.2, 102.8, and 190.0 to 205.0 and stiffness (N/mm) of 20.4, 8.5, and 21.4 to 33.6, respectively. Single-bundle and double-bundle techniques produced an ultimate load to failure (N) of 171 and 213 and stiffness (N/mm) of 13.9 and 17.1, respectively. Anchors placed centrally and superomedially in the patella produced the smallest degree of length changes throughout range of motion in contrast to anchors placed more proximally. Sutures, suture anchors, and transosseous tunnels all produced similar ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and elongation data. Femoral tunnel malpositioning resulted in significant increases in contact pressures, patellar translation, tilt, and graft tightening or loosening. Low tension grafts (2 N) most closely restored the patellofemoral contact pressures, translation, and tilt. Graft fixation angles variably and inconsistently altered contact pressures, and patellar translation and tilt. Conclusion: Data demonstrated that placement of the MPFLR femoral tunnel at the Schöttle point is critical to success. Femoral tunnel diameter should be ≥2 mm greater than graft diameter to limit graft advancement and overtensioning. Graft fixation, regardless of graft choice or fixation angle, is optimally performed under minimal tension with patellar fixation at the medial and superomedial patella. However, lower fixation angles may reduce graft strain, and higher fixation angles may exacerbate anisometry and length changes if femoral tunnel placement is nonanatomic.

Background: Approximately 90% of patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) are satisfied with their pain levels and function after surgery. However, a subset of patients experience continued symptoms that warrant revision surgery. Preoperative risk factors for RCR failure requiring revision surgery have not been clearly defined. Purpose: To (1) determine the rate of RCR failure requiring revision surgery and (2) identify risk factors for revision surgery, which will help surgeons to determine patients who are at the greatest risk for RCR failure. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were performed. The initial search resulted in 3158 titles, and 533 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 10 studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) human clinical studies, (2) arthroscopic RCR, (3) original clinical research, and (4) evaluation of preoperative risk factors for revision. Results: After a full-text review, a total of 16 risk factors were recorded and analyzed across 10 studies. Corticosteroid injection was the most consistent risk factor for revision surgery, reaching statistical significance in 4 of 4 studies, followed by workers’ compensation status (2/3 studies). Patients with corticosteroid injections had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 47% (odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.36-1.52]). Patients with workers’ compensation had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 133% (odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 2.09-2.60]). Age, smoking status, diabetes, and obesity were found to be risk factors in half of the analyzed studies. Conclusion: Corticosteroid injections, regardless of the frequency of injections, and workers’ compensation status were found to be significant risk factors across the literature based on qualitative analysis and pooled analysis. Surgeons should determine ideal candidates for arthroscopic RCR by accounting for corticosteroid injection history, regardless of the frequency, and insurance status of the patient.

Background: Tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a risk factor for recurrent patellar dislocation and is often included in algorithmic treatment of instability. The underlying factors that determine TT-TG have yet to be clearly described in orthopaedic literature. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of our study was to determine the underlying anatomic factors contributing to TT-TG distance. We hypothesized that degree of tubercle lateralization and knee rotation angle may substantially predict TT-TG. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients evaluated for patellar instability at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 were included. Patients with previous knee osseous procedures were excluded. TT-TG and its anatomic relationship to patellofemoral measures, including dysplasia, femoral anteversion, tibial tubercle lateralization, knee rotation angle, and tibial torsion, were measured and subsequently quantified using univariate and multivariable analysis. Results: In total, 76 patients met the inclusion criteria (46 female, 30 male; mean ± SD age, 20.6 ± 8.6 years) and were evaluated. Mean TT-TG was 16.2 ± 5.4 mm. On univariate analysis, increasing knee rotation angle ( P < .01), tibial tubercle lateralization ( P = .02), and tibial torsion ( P = .01) were associated with increased TT-TG. In dysplastic cases, patients without medial hypoplasia (Dejour A or B) demonstrated significantly increased TT-TG (18.1 ± 5.4 mm) as compared with those with medial hypoplasia (Dejour C or D; TT-TG: 14.9 ± 5.2 mm; P = .02). Multivariable analysis revealed that increased knee rotation angle (+0.43-mm TT-TG per degree; P < .01) and tubercle lateralization (+0.19-mm TT-TG per percentage lateralization; P < .01) were statistically significant determinants of increased TT-TG distance. Upon accounting for these factors, tibial torsion, trochlear width, and medial hypoplasia were no longer significant components in predicting TT-TG ( P≥ .54). Of note, all patients with TT-TG ≥20 mm had tibial tubercle lateralization ≥68%, a knee rotation angle ≥5.8°, or both factors concurrently. Conclusion: TT-TG distance is most influenced by knee rotation angle and tibial tubercle lateralization.