Yi, Dongni

Oncogene expression can cause replication stress (RS), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that require repair through pathways such as homologous recombination, nonhomologous end-joining, and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). Cyclin D1 (encoded by CCND1 ) is a well-known oncoprotein overexpressed in cancer; however, its role in RS is unknown. Using mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as a naturally occurring model of cyclin D1 overexpression, we examined the impact of cyclin D1 on RS and DSB repair mechanisms. Cyclin D1 overexpression elevated RS, increased DNA damage, especially during mitosis, and caused specific upregulation of MMEJ. Furthermore, cyclin D1 activated polymerase theta ( POLQ ) transcription by binding its promoter loci, driving POLΘ-mediated MMEJ that is essential to withstand cyclin D1–induced RS. Moreover, concurrent ATM deficiency further intensified RS, enhanced POLQ expression, and heightened reliance on MMEJ-mediated DNA damage repair. Consequently, inhibition of POLΘ in cyclin D1–overexpressed settings further exacerbated RS, causing single-strand DNA gap accumulations and chromosomal instability, ultimately leading to apoptosis, an effect amplified in ATM-deficient cells. Targeting MMEJ via POLΘ inhibition is therefore an effective strategy in the context of cyclin D1 overexpression and ATM deficiency and may provide a unique therapeutic approach for treating MCL and other malignancies characterized by similar alterations.

11549 Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare neoplasm with a subset associated with unicentric Castleman disease (UCD). However, the impact of CD association on clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate differences in disease characteristics and outcomes in FDCS with and without CD to guide future research and clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 41 FDCS patients seen at Mayo Clinic between January 2000 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into CD-related (n = 9) and FDCS-only (n = 32) groups. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and survival data were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Epstein-Barr virus-associated inflammatory FDCS were excluded. Results: The CD-related group was younger at diagnosis (46.0 vs. 58.0 years, p = 0.041). Among those with CD-related FDCS, FDCS was diagnosed concurrently as CD in 6/9 (66.7%) and after the diagnosis of CD in 3/9 (33.3%). The FDCS-only patients were more likely to have extranodal disease (71.9% vs. 22.2%) and to have metastasis (62.5% vs 22.2%). One CD-related FDCS patient had paraneoplastic pemphigus. Among 11 patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, 9 had pathogenic mutations. The most common pathogenic mutations included CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and TRAF3 copy number losses. Surgery was the preferred first-line intervention in FDCS-only and CD-related FDCS groups (19/32, 59.4% vs. 6/9, 66.7%). Eight out of 32 (25.0%) of the FDCS-only group received chemotherapy at first-line, most commonly Gemcitabine/Docetaxel or Adriamycin/Ifosphamide. While Gemcitabine/Docetaxel was the most preferred in the second line, different regimens were pursued in the third and later lines of therapy, including Pembrolizumab, Pazopanib, and stem cell transplant. Five out of 6 patients in the CD-related FDCS group received either adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy, which led to complete remission during the follow-up periods. The median follow-up was 22.4 months for the whole population. There was a trend for better OS and PFS among CD-related FDCS patients. The respective 2-year OS rates were 100% and 66.7%, and 2-year PFS rates were 57.1% and 43.1% for CD-related FDCS and FDCS-only patients, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides novel insights into clinicopathologic differences and survival trends for FDCS. Our data would suggest a less aggressive disease course among CD-related FDCS, which implies the need for different treatment strategies for CD and non-CD-related FDCS. Further research is warranted to elucidate these mechanisms, such as multi-omic analysis on benign FDC proliferation in the microdissected UCD areas and the adjacent FDCS cells to determine factors associated with progression to sarcoma.

Introduction Malignant histiocytoses (MH), encompassing histiocytic sarcoma (HS), interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS), and Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), are a group of rare, hematologic neoplasms with diverse clinical presentations and poor outcomes. There are no established or effective treatments for patients with MH. The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations in non-malignant histiocytoses have revolutionized the treatment paradigm, but it is unknown whether novel treatments are efficacious for MH. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of targeted agents (TA) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in MH. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of MH patients seen at our two institutions. Only patients treated with TA and/or ICI were included. We captured the mutational status by next generation sequencing and PD-L1 expression level by immunohistochemistry, where available. We also conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed to identify additional cases of MH patients treated with TA and/or ICI. Responses were reported as complete (CR), partial (PR), or none (NR) using previously published criteria for histiocytic disorders. Results From our institutions, we identified 12 MH patients (7 HS; 4 LCS; 1 IDCS) who received 14 instances of these treatments including TA (n=9) and/or ICI (n=5). The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range, 33-70) and 50% were males. TAs included BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib [1]), MEK inhibitors (binimetinib [1], cobimetinib [2], trametinib [2]) and others (dasatinib [1], pazopanib [1], pexidartinib [1]), while ICIs were exclusively pembrolizumab (5). The median number of prior treatments for those who received TAs and ICIs were 4 and 2, respectively. Responses were observed in 44.4% (1 CR, 3 PRs, 5 NR) and 40% (2 CRs, 3 NRs) of patients who received TA and ICI, respectively. Only 1 patient (20%) treated with MEK inhibitor responded [DOCK8-BRAF; PR 5+ mos]. Other responders received dasatinib [PDFGRA-V608I; PR 2 mos], pexidartinib [PTPN11-A72T; PR 5 mos], and vemurafenib [BRAF-V600E; CR 10+ mos]. Two patients (40%) who received pembrolizumab responded (both CRs 12+ [10% PD-L1] and 44+ mos [40% PD-L1]). We identified 29 MH patients in the literature (27 HS; 2 LCS) treated with TAs (22) and/or ICIs (10). TAs included BRAF inhibitor only (vemurafenib [3], dabrafenib [3]), MEK inhibitor only (trametinib [5]), BRAF + MEK inhibitors (2), and others (apatinib, anlotimib, bevacizumab, daratumumab, dasatinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, or combinations [9]), while ICIs included pembrolizumab (4), nivolumab (4), tislelizumab (1), and sintilimab (1). Responses were observed in 77% (7 CRs, 10 PRs, 5 NRs) and 100% (2 CRs, 8 PRs) of patients who received targeted agents and ICI, respectively. Most patients carrying BRAF (7/8; V600E, G596R, D594G, TRIM::BRAF) or MAP2K1 (3/3; C121S, F53I) mutations responded to treatments, irrespective of the number of mutations present. The median durations of response for ICI and targeted agents were 10.5 months (range: 1-36+) and 12+ months (range: 3-44+), respectively. After combining the datasets from our institutions and literature review, we analyzed the association between the extent of PD-L1 expression and response to ICI. Those who responded to ICI had higher PDL-1 expression (median 75% [range, 10-75] vs 25% [range, 1-30]; P=0.0097). Conclusion TAs and ICIs can be considered in the management of MH. The responses to ICI therapy may be associated with the degree of PDL1 expression

Introduction. Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) belong to a group of histiocytic neoplasms often driven by mutations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, most commonly in BRAF, MAP2K1 and K/NRAS. Currently, there are 2 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of histiocytic neoplasms, cobimetinib and vemurafenib, both small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKI) targeting mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) and BRAF, respectively. BRAF mutations are functionally classified as RAS-independent - either monomers (class I) or dimers (class II) - and RAS-dependent (class III). MAP2K1 mutations are functionally classified as RAF-independent, RAF-regulated, or RAF-dependent. Preclinical studies suggest class I, but not classes II-III, BRAF mutations are sensitive to RAF monomer inhibitors (dabrafenib, encorafenib, vemurafenib) while classes I-II, but not class III, BRAF mutations are sensitive to MEK inhibitors (Yaeger R, Cancer Discovery 2019). In contrast, RAF-regulated MAP2K1 mutants have variable sensitivities to allosteric MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, cobimetinib, selumetinib, trametinib) while RAF-dependent and RAF-independent MAP2K1 mutations are resistant. KRAS mutations are generally resistant to MEK inhibitors (Johnson C, Cancer Discovery 2022). Our study described the clinical efficacy of commercially available SMKIs in patients with histiocytic neoplasms harboring non-BRAFV600E mutations and compared the findings with preclinical data. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with histiocytic neoplasms who were treated with SMKI at Mayo Clinic. Only those who had adequate genomic testing and non-BRAFV600E mutations were included. Responses were categorized as complete (CR), partial (PR), or none (NR) based on established criteria. Results. We identified 31 non-BRAFV600E patients treated with SMKI (2 LCH; 20 ECD; 9 RDD). The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range: 16-76) and 52% were females. The distribution of BRAF mutations was: class I (V600delinsRE [1]), class II (V495A [1], V471F [1], N486_P490del [2], GAB2-BRAF [1], UBR2-BRAF [1], RNF11-BRAF [1], UBTD2-BRAF [1]), and class III (G466E [1], D594A [1]). The only patient with class I mutation received cobimetinib and had PR. Among those with BRAF class II mutations, 2 received vemurafenib and had NR, while 9 received MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, cobimetinib, trametinib) and most responded (3 CRs, 5 PRs). The patient who had NR required dose reductions due to side effects. Both patients with class III mutation did not respond to cobimetinib. The median duration of responses was 19 months (range: 3+ to 45+) and 3 patients progressed subsequently. The distribution of MAP2K1 mutations was: RAF-independent (E102_103del [2]), RAF-regulated (I103N [1], K57T [1], Q56P [3], F53L [1], K57N [1]) and RAF-dependent (Y130C [1], D67N [1]). Both patients with RAF-independent mutations treated with cobimetinib had PRs. All patients with RAF-regulated mutations treated with allosteric MEK inhibitors responded (3 CRs, 5 PRs). Both patients with RAF-dependent mutations treated with cobimetinib responded (1 CR, 1 PR). The median duration of responses was 15 months (2 to 29+) with 3 patients progressing after treatment cessation due to intolerance. The distribution of RAS mutations was: NRAS (Q16R [1]) and KRAS (K117N [3], A146T [1], T581 [1], G13C [1], G12D [1]). Most patients treated with allosteric MEK inhibitors responded (3 CR, 4 PR, 1 NR). The median duration of response was 15 months (5 to 41) and 2 patients subsequently progressed, one of them after treatment cessation. Conclusions. Among patients with histiocytic neoplasms with non-BRAFV600E mutations receiving SMKI, our study found mixed patterns of concordance between pre-clinical predictions and clinical responses. There was concordance of efficacy in the setting of BRAF classes I-III and MAP2K1 RAF-regulated mutations. However, we found discordant findings in patients harboring RAF-dependent and RAF-independent MAP2K1 mutations as well as KRAS mutations as most responded to allosteric MEK inhibitors.

Oncoprotein-driven human cancers exhibit replication stress (RS), leading to an increase in DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). These DSBs are repaired by one of the three main pathways - homologous recombination repair (HR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Cyclin D1 (CCND1) is one of the most overexpressed oncoproteins and is universally overexpressed in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). While CCND1 overexpression drives cells into the S-phase, its specific effects on RS and DSB repair pathways are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of CCND1 overexpression on RS and DSB repair mechanisms in MCL. First, the expression level of CCND1 positively correlated with heightened RS, as indicated by elevated p-RPA-S33 and p-RPA S8 levels, and increased DNA damage, assessed by g-H2AX, especially in the mitotic phase, across diverse cell models, including MCL. Since CCND1-overexpressed cells proliferate rapidly, we hypothesized that some DNA repair pathways might be upregulated to meet the demand for repairing the excess RS-driven DSBs. Reporter assays demonstrated that the MMEJ pathway was specifically upregulated upon CCND1 overexpression, whereas no significant changes were observed in the HR and NHEJ pathways. Furthermore, CRISPR interference (CRISPRi)-mediated knockdown of CCND1 in MCL cells led to a significant reduction in MMEJ activity. This finding suggests the specificity of CCND1 in mediating the upregulation of the MMEJ pathway. Consistent with this, increased MMEJ activity, assessed via foci formation and immunoblotting of DNA polymerase theta expression (POLQ, encoded by POLQ gene), the primary polymerase for the MMEJ pathway, correlated with CCND1 overexpression, suggesting the crucial role of MMEJ in DSB repair processes under CCND1-overexpressed conditions. Sincethe MMEJ pathwayplays a pivotal role in repairing DSB during mitosis, we assessed the dependency of MCL cells on MMEJ-mediated DSB repair for cell survival. As expected, genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition (ART558 and novobiocin) of POLQ in MCL cells led to increased RS and increased unrepaired DNA damage during mitosis, ultimately leading to chromosomal instability, mitotic catastrophe, and apoptosis. Additionally, the deficiency of POLQ in MCL cells resulted in increased levels of single-strand DNA, another critical biomarker for RS. Second, we found that ATM deficiency, the second most common genetic alteration after CCND1 overexpression in MCL, further increased the cellular dependence on MMEJ. Interestingly, the accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage during mitosis was notably increased in ATM-deficient CCND1-overexpressed cells. When POLQ was inhibited, a significant antitumor effect was evident in MCL cells, including ibrutinib-resistant MCL, both in vitro and in vivo, and this effect was enhanced by ATM deficiency. Further, simultaneous inhibition of both ATM (AZD0156) and POLQ was synthetic lethal in MCL cell lines and primary tumor cells from patients with MCL. Mechanistically, we observed the direct binding of CCND1 to the POLQ promoter and a corresponding upregulation of POLQ mRNA in CCND1-overexpressing cells. Consistently, a significant overexpression of POLQ mRNA was observed in primary MCL cells, compared to other non-Hodgkin lymphoma cells without CCND1 overexpression. Moreover, the positive correlation between POLQ and CCND1 expression was further validated using syngeneic B-lymphoma cells with and without CCND1 overexpression. Importantly, CRISPRi-mediated CCND1 knockdown reduced POLQ mRNA expression and the dependency of MCL cells on the MMEJ pathway for survival. In addition, ATM deficiency showed a further increase of endogenous POLQ expression and foci formation in cells with CCND1 overexpression, suggesting ATM negatively regulates the MMEJ pathway, especially in the CCND1 overexpressed background. In summary, CCND1 overexpression leads to a substantial increase in RS, intensifying the reliance on MMEJ-mediated mitotic DSB repair. Within MCL, POLQ is crucial in mitigating the adversities of CCND1-driven RS. Our data suggest that targeting the MMEJ pathway via POLQ inhibition, particularly in the presence of CCND1 overexpression and ATM deficiency, emerges as a promising therapeutic approach in oncoprotein-driven hematologic malignancies such as MCL.

Background: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) manifests as multi-organ infiltration of clonal histiocytes with mutations primarily in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The revised classification of histiocytosis (2016) categorizes ECD with typical bilateral, symmetric osteosclerosis of the lower extremity long bones as classical (C) and as non-classical (NC) if otherwise. The clinical and biological significance of this classification is unclear. This study compared the clinical and genotypic findings of the 2 subtypes within a large cohort of ECD patients. Methods: We included patients seen at our institution since 1990 meeting the following criteria: A) had an ECD diagnosis based on the revised criteria by Haroche J, et al. (Blood 2020;135:1311-1318); B) completed whole-body imaging studies including long bones of the legs. Classification as C-ECD required symmetric osteosclerosis of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia/fibula. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled, comprising a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 (66.2% male). C-ECD was diagnosed in 77.2% of cases, and NC-ECD in 22.8%. The median age at diagnosis was similar with 58.5 years (range, 18-82) in C-ECD and 55 years (range, 20-81) in NC-ECD, (p=0.65). The most frequently affected systems included skeletal (81.4%), renal (60.0%), vascular (45.5%), cardiac (40.0%), central nervous (38.6%), sinus (37.2%), pulmonary (36.6%), and adrenal (32.4%). The numbers of organs involved were significantly higher in C-ECD compared to NC-ECD (median 5 vs 3, p<0.01). Higher rates of skeletal (100% vs. 18.2%, p<0.01), adrenal gland (37.5% vs. 15.2%, p=0.02), and sinus (44.6% vs. 12.1%, p<0.01) involvement were observed in C-ECD. Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) was exclusively observed in C-ECD (20.7% vs. 0%, p<0.01). NC-ECD had a higher rate of cardiac involvement (69.7% vs. 31.3%, p<0.01). No significant differences were found in other systems. The overall median time between onset of the first symptoms/signs to diagnosis was 15 months with no significant difference between C-ECD and NC-ECD (17.5 vs. 12 months, p=0.18). The median time to diagnosis of ECD in patients with AVP-D was 38.5 months, compared to 12 months without AVP-D (p=0.09). Genetic testing was conducted in 86.2% of patients and B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) alterations were identified in 59.2% of the tested cases. BRAFV600E was more prevalent in C-ECD (61.3% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01), whereas non-V600 mutations were more commonly found in NC-ECD (12.5% vs. 1.1%, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the frequency of BRAF fusions. NC-ECD patients exhibited a higher rate of MAP2K1 mutations (25.0% vs. 5.4%, p<0.01). Other frequently mutated genes included KRAS (4.0%), NRAS (2.4%), and CSF1R (2.4%), although no significant difference was observed in their frequency between C-ECD and NC-ECD. Testicular involvement appeared to be more common in patients with MAP2K1 mutations (23.1% vs. 8%, p=0.08). Two patients with pathogenic CSF1R mutations both had central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Among C-ECD patients, BRAFV600E conferred a higher rate of CNS involvement (50.9% vs. 25%, p=0.01). No significant difference was observed in NC-ECD patients (71.4% vs 36%, p=0.09). Among NC-ECD cases, MAP2K1 mutations conferred a reduced risk of cardiac involvement (37.5% vs. 79.2%, p=0.03) and no such difference was observed in patients with C-ECD (40% vs 34.1%, p=0.79). The median numbers of organs involved in patients with BRAF, MAP2K1, and KRAS/NRAS mutations were 5, 3, and 3, respectively, with no significant difference. Conclusions: C-ECD affects more organs and more frequently involves bones, adrenal glands, and sinuses. AVP-D was exclusively observed in C-ECD. Conversely, NC-ECD showed a higher prevalence of cardiac involvement. BRAFV600E was more commonly identified in C-ECD, whereas non-V600 mutations and MAP2K1 mutations were more prevalent in NC-ECD. Among C-ECD patients, BRAFV600E was correlated with a greater likelihood of CNS involvement. Conversely, NC-ECD patients with MAP2K1 mutations had a reduced risk of cardiac involvement. This study highlights the distinct clinical and molecular features of C-ECD and NC-ECD, underscoring the importance of subclassifying ECD into classical and non-classical forms. Further studies are needed to explore differences in the clinical outcomes between the 2 forms.

Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare low- to intermediate-grade sarcoma, typically presenting as a slowly growing, painless mass composed of spindle-shaped cells in a whorled pattern. First described in 1986, FDCS has since been identified in several hundred cases. FDCS originates from mesenchymal dendritic cells and is distinct from other histiocytic neoplasms. Its management aligns more with soft tissue sarcomas. Epidemiologically, FDCS is exceedingly rare, constituting less than 0.4% of soft tissue sarcomas. Methods: With IRB approval, we identified patients with biopsy-proven FDCS treated at Mayo Clinic. Chart review extracted clinical characteristics, laboratory testing, treatment data, and clinical outcomes, compiled into Excel. Data analysis was performed through RStudios. Descriptive statistics of patient characteristics, such as gender and stage of disease, were summarized in tables. We compared overall survival (OS) through Kaplan Meier curves, stratifying patients into cohorts based on topics of interest, such as differences in survival in nodal vs. extranodal disease or differences in survival among different chemotherapy regimens. Results: Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, of biopsy proved FCDS. Median age at diagnosis was 57.7 years (SD 14). Men comprised 45% of patients. Locations of malignancy were abdomen and pelvis (32.5%), thoracic and pulmonary regions (32.5%), lymph nodes and neck (20.0%), musculoskeletal (2.5%), and other locations (12.5%). Primary therapies included surgical resection (42.5%), systemic chemotherapy (32.5%), no treatment (10.0%), radiation (2.5%), with data missing for 12.5% of cases. Concurrent or preceding Castleman's Disease was seen in 7.5% (3/40) of patients; one case preceded FCDS, and two were concurrent. Of these patients with Castleman's Disease, one was resected and the other two were not. Two cases were unicentric, and one was multicentric. First-line systemic chemotherapy was most often gemcitabine and docetaxel, with 9/40 patients receiving this regimen. Ifosfamide and doxorubicin were utilized in 3/40 patients. 2/4 patients had received doxorubicin alone. 2/4 patients had received CHOP. The response rate for patients with gemcitabine and docetaxel was complete response for 2/9 (22%) patients, partial response for 2/9 (22%), stable disease for 2/9 (22%), progressive disease for 1/9 (11%), and missing for 2/9 (22%), giving an overall response rate of 67%. For ifosfamide and doxorubicin, one patient had partial response (33%), another had stable disease (33%), and the last patient's data was missing (33%), adding up to a 66% overall response rate. For CHOP, one patient had progressive disease, and the other had partial response. For doxorubicin, both patients had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 29.5 months (IQR 9.2-75.2 months), the median OS was 160.68 months for the group with both nodal and extranodal disease versus 39.95 months for the extranodal disease-only group. The median OS of the nodal disease alone was not reached, with an estimated 2-year OS of 75%. To evaluate the impact of various primary therapies on outcomes in patients with advanced disease, we conducted a survival analysis by therapy used (no treatment, radiation, surgical resection, and systemic chemotherapy). Patients receiving no treatment had a median survival time of 28.9 months, while those treated with radiation had a median survival time of 19.3 months. Patients undergoing surgical resection had an undetermined median survival time, but notably, 80% were alive at the end of the time period analyzed in this study with a median follow-up time of 60.7 months. Those receiving systemic chemotherapy had a median survival time of 30.7 months. Conclusions: This project is one of the largest known single-center studies dedicated to FDCS. We show that the incidence of preceding or concurrent Castleman's Disease is relatively low. Gemcitabine and docetaxel was the most utilized chemotherapy regimen, but there weren't enough data to conclude if this regimen had a better response rate compared to others. Surgical resection of advanced disease is associated with superior outcomes. When systemic therapy is needed, the median survival was lower.

e23554 Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a low-grade neoplasm arising from follicular dendritic cells. Its diagnosis is challenging due to its extreme rarity, and the optimal management remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of FDCS patients (pts) seen at Mayo Clinic, MN since 2018. Time to event analyses were done from the time of diagnosis. Results: Ten pts with FDCS were identified (Table). The median age was 60 years (range, 38-76) and 5 were males. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (30%) followed by constitutional symptoms, shortness of breath, and vision change. In 3 pts, the diagnosis was incidental. The 2 most common primary locations were abdomen/pelvis (50%) and mediastinum (30%). Six pts (60%) presented with advanced disease and 3 (30%) had Castleman’s disease. Most (60%) had advanced disease. Six pts had Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization and all tested negative. Seven pts had next generation sequencing and 5 (83%) had genetic alterations detected with CDKN2A/B alterations being most frequent (3 pts, all with advanced disease). The median follow up was 4.3 years (range, 0.2-13.3). In the 4 patients with localized disease, 3 underwent complete surgical excision resulting in complete remissions (CRs). The one who received radiation had a partial remission (PR). The median time to progression after 1st line treatment was 4 months (all with advanced disease). All 3 pts who died had advanced disease and 2 had CDKN2A/B alterations. Conclusions: In FDCS, localized diseases managed by surgical excision with or without radiation can achieve long term remissions. Advanced diseases generally do not respond to multimodality therapy including immunotherapy but can have disease stabilization with variable survival. CDKN2A/B mutations were common and potentially associated with a worse outcome. Better understanding of the impact of the FDCS mutational landscape on prognosis may provide novel approaches to therapy. [Table: see text]

The treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved considerably with the FDA-approval of at least 15 drugs over the past two decades. Together with the use of autologous stem cell transplantation, these novel therapies have resulted in significant survival benefit for patients with MM. In particular, our improved understanding of the BM and immune microenvironment has led to the development of highly effective immunotherapies that have demonstrated unprecedented response rates even in the multiple refractory disease setting. However, MM remains challenging to treat especially in a high-risk setting. A key mediator of therapeutic resistance in MM is the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment; a deeper understanding is necessary to facilitate the development of therapies that target MM in the context of the BM milieu to elicit deeper and more durable responses with the ultimate goal of long-term control or a cure of MM. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the role the BM microenvironment plays in MM pathogenesis, with a focus on its immunosuppressive nature. We also review FDA-approved immunotherapies currently in clinical use and highlight promising immunotherapeutic approaches on the horizon.