Matchett, Caroline L.

Abstract Introduction Professional identity formation in healthcare professions education (HPE) is a complex and often fraught process. Physicians and trainees experience identity struggles as they navigate their personal and professional development, along with the conflicting expectations, cultural norms and systemic pressures within the healthcare environment. Despite growing attention to these challenges, conceptual clarity around identity struggle remains limited. Method To advance theoretical understanding of identity struggle, we conducted a critical narrative review of identity theories from developmental psychology, social psychology and sociology. We selected three major theoretical traditions—Neo‐Eriksonian, symbolic interactionist and social identity theories—and analysed their conceptualizations of identity, identity development and identity struggle. We examined these diverse perspectives to inform research and educational practice on professional identity formation in HPE. Results Each theoretical tradition offers distinct insights into identity struggle. Neo‐Eriksonian theories emphasize exploration and commitment as central processes, framing struggle as developmental and potentially productive. Symbolic Interactionist theories highlight the role of socialization and identity dissonance, viewing struggle as emerging from tensions between personal agency and societal norms. Social Identity theories focus on group belonging and intergroup dynamics, conceptualizing struggle at both individual and socio‐contextual levels. We provide common critiques and limitations of each theoretical tradition. These perspectives illuminate varied mechanisms through which identity struggle manifests and evolves. Discussion This review underscores the multifaceted nature of identity struggle and the value of theoretical pluralism in understanding professional identity formation. Struggle is not inherently negative; rather, it can be a catalyst for growth when appropriately framed and supported. We propose how educators and researchers might use these theoretical lenses to design interventions that foster productive identity development and address systemic contributors to identity struggles. We invite scholars drawing on critical perspectives of power and structure to challenge and deepen the conversation on identity struggle in HPE.

Abstract Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and there are limited molecular screening options. Following a prior discovery and validation studies in subjects from the United States, China, and Iran, we aimed to validate methylated DNA markers (MDM) for ESCC detection in Malawi, a country with one of the highest ESCC incidence. Fourteen MDMs were tested on 177 tissue samples. Ten MDMs showed excellent performance (AUCs ≥ 0.85); a random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.97. The consistent cross-population performance suggests potential for universal application of these MDMs and further justifies exploring nonendoscopic sampling methods, such as swallowed cell collection devices in combination with MDMs, for efficient and cost-effective screening in high-incidence populations. Prevention Relevance: This study validates MDMs for early detection of ESCC in Malawi, supporting their potential role in noninvasive, population-based screening strategies in Africa to enable early detection and timely intervention for cancer interception, potentially reducing cancer burden in high-incidence, resource-limited regions.

Objective: To gain firsthand accounts from female physician leaders in academic medicine to better understand the challenges and success factors they have encountered in order to provide insights to early-career female physicians and inform organizations about the challenges faced by female physicians to build better systems and processes to support them in achieving more satisfying and fulfilling careers within an academic setting. Method: This qualitative research study is based on interviews with female physician leaders. Participants were selected based on their scores in multi-rater leadership assessments taken within the past three years, all ranking in the top 30% across four capabilities: Inspiring Values, Engaging Colleagues, Bold and Forward Thinking, and Driving Results. Coding and thematic analysis were used to categorize the challenges and success factors. Results: Data analysis revealed challenges experienced by these female physician leaders, including gender bias, time constraints, family responsibilities, change and innovation, self-doubt, and exclusion from networking. The strategies identified for navigating these challenges and achieving high performance included support from family and colleagues, building relationships and networking, maintaining a positive attitude, making powerful choices, seizing opportunities, finding value, meaning, and purpose, continuous learning, strategic planning, and gaining recognition. Conclusion: Challenges for female leaders in academic medicine are prevalent and evolve alongside changes in health care. Success factors can be generated at an individual level, such as attitudes, making powerful choices, and networking. However, societal and organizational support, including assistance with family responsibilities and providing opportunities, feedback, and mentorship, has also been identified as crucial.

Abstract Aberrant DNA methylation and copy-number alterations (CNA) drive Barrett’s esophagus progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma; however, their combined utility for early detection is unclear. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDM) and CNAs to distinguish esophageal adenocarcinoma/high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE). In this multiphase, multicenter study, we discovered and validated MDMs and quantified CNAs utilizing whole-genome methylation sequencing of esophageal brushings. DNA biomarkers identified from discovery were further validated in independent patients with paired esophageal brushing and swallowed capsule sponge samples. MDMs were filtered against a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing dataset obtained from independent tissue samples to advance only concordant candidates. CNA burden was quantified using ichorCNA-derived aneuploidy scores (AS). Two hundred MDMs discovered in HGD (N = 18) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (N = 18) versus NDBE brushing samples (N = 18) were tested in independent samples (N = 146). A 52-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–0.95]; the addition of AS improved discrimination of HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma from NDBE to 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86–0.97) AUC. At 80% specificity, the combined model detected 93% of esophageal adenocarcinoma and 88% of HGD cases. In paired capsule sponge samples, a 58-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66–0.88); a combined 58-MDM and AS model achieved AUC 0.80 (95% CI, 0.7–0.9). MDMs and AS discerned HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma from normal esophagus/NDBE in endoscopic brushing and capsule sponge samples. This approach may improve Barrett’s esophagus surveillance. Prevention Relevance: This study demonstrates that combining epigenetic and genomic biomarkers across minimally invasive sampling methods can accurately distinguish HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma from nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus, offering promising, less invasive strategies to improve BE surveillance and enable endoscopic therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma prevention and treatment.

Abstract Background Perianal draining tunnels in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and perianal fistulizing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present diagnostic and management dilemmas. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with perianal disease evaluated at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1998, through July 31, 2021. Patients' demographic and clinical data were extracted, and 28 clinical features were collected. After experimenting with several machine learning techniques, random forests were used to select the 15 most important clinical features to construct the diagnostic prediction model to distinguish perianal HS from fistulizing perianal IBD. Results A total of 263 patients were included (98 with HS, 100 with IBD, and 65 with both IBD and HS). Patients with HS had a higher mean body mass index, a higher smoking rate, and more commonly showed cutaneous manifestations of tunnels and comedones, while fistulas, abscesses, induration, anal tags, ulcers, and anal fissures were more common in patients with IBD. In addition to having lesions in the perianal area, patients with IBD often had lesions in the buttocks and perineum, while those with HS had additional lesions in the axillae and groin. Among the statistically significant features, the 15 most important were identified by random forest: fistula , tunnel , digestive symptom , knife‐cut ulcer , perineum , body mass index , age , axilla , abscess , tags , smoking , groin , genital cutaneous edema , erythema , and bilateral/unilateral . Conclusions The results of this study may help differentiate perianal lesions, especially perineal HS and fistulizing perineal IBD, and provide promise for a better therapeutic outcome.

Abstract Introduction: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) confers increased cancer risk. Endoscopic surveillance is recommended to distinguish non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD), or adenocarcinoma (EAC) for endoscopic intervention. However, this paradigm is limited by sampling error, leading to missed/interval EAC. Herein, we aimed to classify these samples more accurately by performing whole genome methylation sequencing (WGMS) and utilizing multiple genomic features on endoscopic brush samples. Materials and methods: Endoscopic brush samples from patients with NDBE (n=18), HGD (18), EAC (18), and normal controls (18) were collected and underwent WGMS (discovery dataset). Sequence reads were processed through internal pipeline to extract CpG methylation and read level methylation ratio (alpha value). Copy number aberration (CNA) detection was performed using both CNVkit and ichorCNA. Differential methylated regions (DMRs) were identified through comparing EAC/HGD with NDBE and normal samples. Targeted methylation sequencing for selected DMRs and shallow WGMS were performed on EAC (41), HGD (26), LGD (23), NDBE (42), and normal controls (37) as validation. Ratio of the reads with alpha value>0.6 for each DMR was used for further analysis. Detected CNA segments were summarized into chromosome arm loss or gain (aneuploidy score or AS representing the number of chromosome arms gained or lost in a sample) and trimmed median absolute deviation (tMAD). Classification models were developed using the discovery set and the best performing one was applied to the validation dataset. Results: Genome-wide DNA methylation largely segregated different groups of samples as diagnosed; however, some unexpected group crossings were observed. Top 200 DMRs were identified between EAC/HGD and NDBE and normal samples. CNA changes were widespread in EAC, very common in HGD but rare in NDBE (17/18 EACs,14/18 HGDs, 5/18 NDBEs with AS>0). With tMAD > 0.015, 16/18 EACs, 8/18 HGDs but none of 18 NDBEs passed the threshold. EAC or HGD samples without detectable CNAs had very low “tumor” fraction as determined by methylation-based cell type deconvolution or ichorCNA. Similar results were found in the validation dataset. A multi-omics (AS, tMAD, estimated tumor fraction, and DMR methylation) model could predict EAC, HGD, or NDBE with 0.81 accuracy through cross validation (10X) and 0.73 in the independent dataset. This increased to 0.98 and 0.90 in separating high risk EAC/HGD from NDBE, respectively. Conclusion: Multi-omics data obtained from single WGMS allow for a comprehensive analysis of BE samples with varying dysplasia levels. Using classification modeling, these characteristics can be effectively used to accurately identify and distinguish between EAC and HGD from NDBE, suggesting their utility as adjuncts to endoscopic surveillance biopsies. Citation Format: Zhifu Sun, Caroline L. Matchett, Seth W. Slettedahl, William R. Taylor, Panwen Wang, Calise Berger, Caryn E. Anderson, Melissa A. Passe, Ramona Lansing, Collin E. Chalmers, Patrick H. Foote, Jeanette E. Eckel Passow, Doug W. Mahoney, John B. Kisiel, Prasad G. Iyer. Multi-omics cancer risk assessment of Barrett’s esophagus with DNA methylation sequencing from endoscopic brush samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB249.