Shaikh, Preet Ayoub

AbstractBackgroundAccurate automated wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) differentiation into ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia (SWCT) can be accomplished using calculations derived from computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) data of paired WCT and baseline ECGs.ObjectiveDevelop and trial novel WCT differentiation approaches for patients with and without a corresponding baseline ECG.MethodsWe developed and trialed WCT differentiation models comprised of novel and previously described parameters derived from WCT and baseline ECG data. In Part 1, a derivation cohort was used to evaluate five different classification models: logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), Random Forests [RF], support vector machine (SVM), and ensemble learning (EL). In Part 2, a separate validation cohort was used to prospectively evaluate the performance of two LR models using parameters generated from the WCT ECG alone (Solo Model) and paired WCT and baseline ECGs (Paired Model).ResultsOf the 421 patients of the derivation cohort (Part 1), a favorable area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) by all modeling subtypes: LR (0.96), ANN (0.96), RF (0.96), SVM (0.96), and EL (0.97). Of the 235 patients of the validation cohort (Part 2), the Solo Model and Paired Model achieved a favorable AUC for 103 patients with (Solo Model 0.87; Paired Model 0.95) and 132 patients without (Solo Model 0.84; Paired Model 0.95) a corroborating electrophysiology procedure or intracardiac device recording.ConclusionAccurate WCT differentiation may be accomplished using computerized data of (i) the WCT ECG alone and (ii) paired WCT and baseline ECGs.

Abstract Background Accurate automated wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) discrimination between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia (SWCT) can be accomplished using novel calculations derived from computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) data from paired WCT and baseline ECGs. Purpose Our aim was to develop and trial novel WCT discrimination approaches for WCT patients with and without a corresponding baseline ECG. Central to this analysis was the creation and use of a novel parameter (i.e., percent monophasic time-voltage area [PMonoTVA] [%]) that may be derived from computerized ECG measurements present on the WCT ECG alone. Methods In a two-part study, we derived and tested WCT differentiation models comprised of novel and previously established parameters formulated from computerized data of paired WCT and baseline ECGs. In Part 1, novel and established parameters generated from WCT and baseline ECG data were used to derive, validate, and compare five different binary classification models: (i) logistic regression [LR], (ii) artificial neural network [ANN], (iii) Random Forests [RF], (iv) support vector machine [SVM], and (v) ensemble learning (EL). In Part 2, two unique LR models were derived, validated, and compared using parameters generated from computerized data of the (i) WCT ECG alone (i.e., Solo Model) and (ii) paired WCT and baseline ECGs (i.e., Paired Model). Results In Part 1, among 103 patients with VT or SWCT diagnoses established from corroborating electrophysiology studies or intra-cardiac device recordings, favorable diagnostic performance was achieved by all modeling technique subtypes: LR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.95), ANN (AUC 0.91), RF (AUC 0.97), SVM (AUC 0.98), and EL (AUC 0.97). In Part 2, among 235 patients with a VT or SWCT diagnosis established with (Gold Standard cohort) or without (Non-Gold Standard cohort) a corroborating electrophysiology procedure or intra-cardiac device recording, favorable diagnostic performance was achieved by the Solo Model (AUC 0.86) and Paired Model (AUC 0.95) (Table). Conclusion Accurate WCT discrimination may be accomplished using novel parameters derived from computerized data of the WCT ECG alone and paired WCT and baseline ECGs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Institute of Health