Mazar, Andrew P.

4213 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) inhibitor, has multimodal antitumor activity. In the international, open-label, randomized phase 2 1801 Part 3B study, elraglusib plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was evaluated in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), with patients randomized 2:1 to weekly elraglusib/GnP or GnP alone. Primary endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and 1-year survival. The GnP control arm demonstrated shorter mOS than contemporary randomized trials (7.2 months vs 9.2 months in NAPOLI-3 and 9.7 months in PASS-01), driven by higher early mortality (0–2 months: 23.1% vs 10.1% in NAPOLI-3). Given balanced randomization, similar early mortality was inferred in the elraglusib/GnP arm, prompting post-hoc analyses to contextualize efficacy and identify factors associated with early death. Methods: Efficacy and safety were summarized descriptively. Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazards models. Response rates were compared using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. Post-hoc subgroup, sensitivity, and machine-learning–based multivariate analyses explored clinical, demographic, and biomarker correlates of survival and early mortality. Results: In the full randomized population (elraglusib/GnP n=155; GnP n=78), elraglusib/GnP improved mOS by 2.9 months versus GnP (10.1 vs 7.2 months; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46–0.84; p=0.01), with 1-year survival rates of 44.1% versus 22.3%. Among patients receiving ≥1 full treatment cycle, mOS was 12.5 months with elraglusib/GnP and 8.5 months with GnP, comparable to contemporary registrational trials. Across multiple post-hoc sensitivity analyses—including evaluable patients, those matched to NAPOLI-3 baseline tumor burden, patients treated in the EU (early mortality 4%), and those achieving ≥20% CA19-9 decline within the first 1–2 cycles—elraglusib/GnP consistently demonstrated a ≥4-month OS advantage. Early death was associated with low baseline albumin (<3 g/dL), high CA19-9 (>800 U/mL), high tumor burden, and KRAS, TP53, and CDKN2A co-mutations. Conclusions: The elevated early mortality in the GnP control arm reflects enrollment of a heterogeneous, real-world mPDAC population with less restrictive eligibility than recent registrational trials. Post-hoc analyses identify key clinical and molecular drivers of early death and confirm a consistent survival benefit with elraglusib/GnP. These hypothesis-generating findings directly inform eligibility criteria, stratification, and endpoint assumptions for the planned phase 3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

761 Background: Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β (GSK-3β) is a known therapeutic target in cancer including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The combination of elraglusib (9-ING-41), a novel GSK-3 inhibitor, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is being evaluated as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC). We previously reported topline results indicating that the 1801 Part 3B phase 2 trial (NCT03678883) met its primary endpoint, showing a clinically meaningful survival benefit in patients treated with elraglusib/GnP compared to GnP alone. Here, we examined whether gene mutations correlated with clinical outcomes in mPDAC patients enrolled in this randomized phase 2 trial. Methods: For mutational analysis, archival tumor and/or plasma samples were obtained from 53 (GnP group) and 117 (elraglusib/GnP group) patients with previously untreated mPDAC. Cell-free DNA and/or tumor-extracted DNA were analyzed using the next generation sequencing. The comparison of the response rates was performed with the use of Chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests. Results: Mutational analysis identified frequently mutated genes (detectable in ≥25% of patients): KRAS (141/170, 83%), TP53 (121/170, 71%), and CDKN2A (56/170, 33%). Mutations in KRAS, TP53, or CDKN2A genes did not correlate with objective response rate. Based on 81% of the recorded death events in the elraglusib/GnP group and 91% in the GnP group (topline data April, 2025), KRAS and TP53 gene mutations were associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients treated with elraglusib/GnP (p<0.05) but not in GnP-treated patients. The rate of triple (KRAS+TP53+CDKN2A) mutations was significantly higher in the patients with OS<2 months as compared to the patients with OS>2 months in the elraglusib/GnP group (p<0.05) but not in the GnP group. Conclusions: Our preliminary results identified KRAS and TP53 gene mutations as potential predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome in elraglusib/GnP-treated mPDAC patients. Updated OS data and mutational analysis will be included in the final presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

653 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a novel small molecule inhibitor of GSK-3ß, has a multimodal mechanism of action that enhances chemotherapy cytotoxicity and regulates anti-tumor immune cell response. Elraglusib was evaluated in a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study (NCT03678883) comparing elraglusib/GnP vs GnP in previously untreated mPDAC. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to GnP plus elraglusib 9.3 mg/kg IV once weekly or GnP. Primary endpoint was mOS, with 1-yr OS rate estimates summarizing clinical benefit throughout the study. Secondary endpoints were ORR, mPFS, and TEAEs/TRAEs. Pre-dose cytokines, mutational analysis, and immunophenotyping were correlated with outcomes. An oral presentation at ASCO 2025 discussed preliminary data. Results: As of 27 April 2025, the primary analysis set included 155 pts in the elraglusib/GnP arm and 78 pts in the GnP arm, with 52.8% males and 57.5% ECOG PS 1. The 1-yr OS rate was 44.1% with elraglusib/GnP vs 22.3% with GnP; the mOS was 10.1 mo with elraglusib/GnP vs 7.2 mo with GnP (HR, 0.62; p=0.01) with approximately 79% events recorded (25.8% of pts on elraglusib/GnP and 10.3% on GnP were censored with the majority at >12 mo OS). Improved OS with elraglusib/GnP was consistent across all randomized pts and subgroups regardless of liver metastases, ECOG status, or baseline CA 19-9 levels. Most common TRAE with elraglusib/GnP was grade 1-2 transient visual impairment (66.5% pts vs 0 with GnP). Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs with elraglusib/GnP (vs GnP) were neutropenia 52.3% (vs 30.8%) and anemia 25.2% (vs 29.5%). No differences in sepsis/febrile neutropenia rates were between arms. RAS , TP53 and CDKN2A co-mutations were associated with worse OS in the elraglusib/GnP arm only (p<0.05). Elevation in pre-dose cytokines including CXCL2 correlated with improved OS in the elraglusib/GnP arm. Additionally, increased CD8+ T cells, granzyme B, and NK cells and reduced MDSCs were observed in elraglusib-treated tumors. Conclusions: A significant benefit for 1-yr OS and mOS and a favorable trend for ORR were observed with the addition of elraglusib to GnP. The mOS was lower in the GnP arm vs historical studies, likely due to early deaths in the first 2 months, but aligns with mOS estimates in the real-world analysis with broad heterogeneous population. Our study included 19.7% pts with albumin <3.0 g/dL and >25% with CA 19.9 levels > 8,000 U/mL. Immune correlates support elraglusib’s immune-modulatory role. Final efficacy data cut-off in Dec 2025 and correlative studies will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 . Outcome Elraglusib/GnPN=155 GnPN=78 Primary endpoint: mOS (mo)HR=0.62; log-rank p=0.01 10.1 7.2 Events, n (%) 115 (74.2) 70 (89.7) Primary endpoint: 1-yr OS (%) 44.1 22.3 18-month OS (%) 20.5 4.4 24-month OS (%) 13.2 0 mPFS (mo)HR=0.9; p=NS 5.6 5.1 Events, n (%) 136 (87.7) 75 (96.2) ORR, n (%) 44 (28.4) 17 (21.8)

4185 Background: Elraglusib is a first-in-class inhibitor of GSK-3ß, a well-credentialed target in cancer implicated in intrinsic oncologic processes and tumor immune response. Preliminary results of the 1801 Part 3B trial (NCT03678883) showed statistically significant benefits for elraglusib+GnP versus GnP for 1-year survival and mOS in mPDAC (companion abstract: Mahalingam et al.). We investigated plasma levels of cytokines/chemokines/soluble cell receptors/growth factors (CCSG) as potential biomarkers of favorable outcomes on elraglusib. Methods: Forty CCSGs were evaluated in pre-dose plasma from patients with previously untreated mPDAC enrolled in 1801 Part 3B treated with GnP (n = 78) or elraglusib+GnP (n = 155) using a Luminex immunoassay. Using Kaplan-Meier statistics and cutpoint determination, CCSGs were assessed for OS predictive ability in the elraglusib+GnP arm. Multivariate models were constructed to predict binarized survival at 12 months using machine learning (ML). Fivefold cross-validation was used in both analyses, and all methods were applied to the GnP arm to identify elraglusib+GnP specific predictors. Results: Data shown as of November 15, 2024. Multiple CCSGs significantly stratified elraglusib+GnP patients. The most extreme prognosticators were IFN-ß (average HR = 2.34), and PD-L1 (average HR = 0.52) (HR shown as high CCSG vs low CCSG). Screening of different ML approaches ranked logistic regression at the top, and hyperparameter grid search identified stochastic gradient solver with ridge regularization as the optimal method. The model had an accuracy of 88% (SD: 3.9%) and a balanced accuracy of 80% (SD: 8.5%). IFN-beta had the most substantial effect size (odds ratio (OR) = 72.28), followed by IL-18 (OR = 23.38) and PD-L1 (OR = 15.32). All other CCSGs had an OR between 0.03 and 6.71. When this model was applied to patients in the GnP arm, accuracy was 68.4%, and balanced accuracy was 43.1%. Conclusions: Many CCSG biomarkers were identified as promising predictors of survival benefit in mPDAC patients treated with elraglusib+GnP. Both univariate statistical and multivariate ML approaches show predictive significance with high interpretability. The initial ML model is specific to elraglusib treatment, not GnP alone. These results indicate that patients’ initial immune state plays a role in response to elraglusib+GnP. However, single CCSGs for enrichment currently exclude too many patients ( > 75%), and thus, panels of biomarkers are being investigated with ML to overcome this limitation. The 1801 Part 3B clinical trial recruitment has been completed, and updated biomarker models reflective of topline OS data, available by April 2025, will be presented.

4006 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41) is a first-in-class inhibitor of GSK-3ß, which may mediate drug resistance, EMT, and damaged DNA and tumor immune response in advanced cancer. In pancreatic cancer models in mice, elraglusib combined with chemotherapy enhanced anti-tumor effects and survival. In a single-arm clinical study, elraglusib/GnP showed antitumor activity and prolonged survival in pts with mPDAC. Methods: Pts with previously untreated mPDAC were randomized 2:1 to GnP plus elraglusib 9.3 mg/kg IV once weekly or GnP in an open-label phase 2 study. The primary endpoint was 1-yr OS in the primary analysis set. Upon study completion, mOS will be the primary endpoint once survival distributions are compared after the 12-month follow-up using log-rank analysis. Secondary endpoints included DCR, ORR, mPFS, and TEAEs/TRAEs. The planned sample size was 207 evaluable pts (130 for elraglusib/GnP and 77 for GnP), assuming 1-yr OS of 55% with elraglusib/GnP and 35% with GnP to achieve 80% power with a chi-square test at a 2-sided 5% α. For OS, nonparametric log-rank test was used with statistical significance at p-value < 0.048. Cytokine/chemokine correlative biomarker assays were performed. The study completed enrollment in February 2024. Results: As of November 15, 2024 (preliminary data cut-off date), the primary analysis set included 155 pts in the elraglusib/GnP arm and 78 pts in the GnP arm, with 52.8% males and 57.5% ECOG PS 1. Median (range) CA 19-9 levels were 1568 U/mL (1 to 381,904 U/mL) in the elraglusib/GnP arm and 1590 U/mL (2 to 501,000 IU/mL) in the GnP arm. The 1-yr OS rate was 43.6% with elraglusib/GnP vs 22.5% with GnP (z-test p = 0.002); the mOS was 9.3 mo with elraglusib/GnP vs 7.2 mo with GnP (HR, 0.63; log rank p = 0.016; see Table). 38.1% of pts on elraglusib/GnP and 19.2% on GnP are censored, with the majority at > 10 months OS. Several biomarkers appear to be predictive for OS including IFNβ and PD-L1. The most common TRAE with elraglusib/GnP was grade 1-2 transient visual impairment in > 60% of patients (vs 9% with GnP). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 89.7% of pts on elraglusib/GnP and 80.8% on GnP. Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs with elraglusib/GnP (vs GnP) were neutropenia 51.6% (vs 29.5%), anemia 24.5% (vs 29.5%), and fatigue 16.1% (vs 5.1%). Conclusions: The preliminary results showed a statistically significant benefit for 1-yr OS and mOS and favorable trends for ORR and DCR with elraglusib/GnP over GnP, with manageable safety profile. The mOS for GnP is lower relative to MPACT and NAPOLI-3 but comparable to recent real-world meta-analyses, explained by advanced disease burden and higher mortality rate in the first 4 months in our study. Topline analysis (April 2025) and correlative biomarker analysis predictive for OS will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 . Preliminary efficacy results. Elraglusib/GnPn=155 GnPn=78 1-year OS, %z-test p=0.002 43.6 22.5 mOS, moHR=0.63; log-rank p=0.016 9.3 7.2 Events, n (%) 96 (61.9) 63 (80.8) mPFS, moHR=0.91; p=NS 5.6 4.9 Events, n (%) 128 (82.6) 70 (89.7) DCR, % 42.6 33.3 ORR, n (%) 43 (27.7) 16 (20.5)

e16331 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a potent and selective GSK-3 inhibitor, is a targeted anticancer agent with clinical activity in phase 1 trial and undergoing clinical development for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Elraglusib (9-ING-41) displayed immune-modulatory activity in preclinical models and modulation of serum cytokine profile in clinical specimens. Here, we investigated the correlation between plasma levels of cytokines/chemokines/soluble cell receptors/growth factors (CCSG) and clinical outcomes of patients with mPDAC treated with elraglusib and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in an exploratory study. Methods: CCSGs were evaluated in the pre-dose plasma samples of patients with newly diagnosed mPDAC enrolled in the 1801 phase 2 study (NCT03678883) treated with GnP (n = 13) or elraglusib/GnP (n = 32). Using a Luminex immunoassay, 40 CCSGs were screened as predictive biomarkers of median overall survival (mOS) in the elraglusib/GnP arm using 5-fold cross-validation and maximally selected rank statistic cutpoint determination. A subset of CCSGs (n = 10) was remeasured using an MSD immunoassay with greater sensitivity. Maximally selected rank statistic cutpoint determinations were conducted using MSD results for elraglusib/GnP samples with mOS and median progression free survival (mPFS). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Luminex screening revealed several CCSGs significantly stratified elraglusib/GnP patients by mOS. IL-6 and IL-8 were identified as top candidates with stable and significant results on cross-validation. Using the MSD assay, both were confirmed to stratify elraglusib/GnP patients by OS and extended to analyze PFS. Low level of IL-8 conferred a better OS prognosis (HR: 0.0919, 95%, CI: 0.0205-0.411, P < 0.001) than low IL-6 (HR: 0.205, 95%, CI: 0.063-0.665, P = 0.005) in the elraglusib/GnP treated patients. Correlations with mPFS were similar in the elraglusib/GnP patients for IL-6 (HR: 0.248, 95% CI: 0.072-0.848, P = 0.02) and IL-8 (HR: 0.297, 95%, CI: 0.111-0.743, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Preliminary results of our exploratory study identified low plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8 prior to elraglusib/GnP treatment as potential predictive biomarkers associated with improved outcomes in previously untreated patients with mPDAC. The 1801 Part 3 Arm B clinical trial recruitment has been completed. We plan to analyze additional pre-dose plasma samples obtained from approximately 200 patients by April 2024. These will be analyzed using interim OS data available by April 2024 and included in the final presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

e16306 Background: Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta has been well-credentialed as a therapeutic target in patients with advanced cancer including pancreatic cancer. Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a novel best-in-class GSK-3 inhibitor, is being developed in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC). Using liquid biopsy samples from an ongoing randomized phase 2 trial (1801 Part 3B; NCT03678883), we examined whether gene mutations in cfDNA correlated with clinical outcomes in mPDAC patients treated with GnP or elraglusib/GnP. Methods: Pre-dose plasma samples were obtained from 37 (GnP arm) and 89 (elraglusib/GnP arm) mPDAC patients previously untreated for advanced disease. Mutational analysis of cfDNA extracted from plasma samples was performed by Tempus (Chicago, IL) using the xF+ platform. The Tempus xF+ assay is an NGS cfDNA liquid biopsy tumor profiling assay for identifying genomic alterations in 523 genes. Tempus xF+ reports were used for analysis of gene mutations. Results: In 126 pancreatic cancer patients, frequently mutated genes ( > 10%) consisted of KRAS (93/126, 74%), TP53 (79/126, 63%), CDKN2A (26/126, 21%), DNMT3A (25/126, 20%), NOTCH1/2 (25/126, 20%), and MLL3 (23/126, 18%). Gain-of-function mutations in KRAS, and loss-of-function mutations of TP53, and CDKN2A genes were associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients treated with elraglusib/GnP (P < 0.05) but not in GnP-treated patients. Multivariate analysis of frequently mutated genes showed that patients with double (KRAS+TP53) and triple (KRAS+TP53+CDKN2A) mutations had significantly worse OS only in the elraglusib/GnP arm. The presence of DNMT3A, NOTCH1/2 or MLL3 gene mutations did not correlate with any clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis of gene mutations in liquid biopsy samples obtained from patients in the ongoing 1801 Part 3B phase 2 trial identified potential predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome in mPDAC patients treated with combination of elraglusib/GnP. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

Abstract Cytokines mediate strong immunomodulatory effects in cancer. Elraglusib (9-ING-41), an inhibitor of GSK-3, is a potent antitumor and immune-modulatory agent in phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of various cancers. Here, we examined the immune environment of elraglusib-treated cancer patients by measuring peripheral blood protein levels to explore whether the expression level of cytokines/chemokines/soluble cell receptors/growth factors (CCSG) is correlated with clinical outcome. Using a customized Luminex platform, the expression of forty CCSG hypothesized to be linked to GSK-3 activity was assessed in pre-dose plasma samples obtained from 45 cancer patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic disease (NCT03678883; the 1801 trial). All patients in the 1801 trial were treated with elraglusib (dose range: 1-15 mg/kg) either as a single agent (Part 1; n=21) or in combination with chemotherapy (Part 2; n=24). Pre-dose peripheral blood protein levels were examined as binary predictors of clinical outcome using optimal cutoff points determined by maximally selected rank statistics. In the aggregate Part 1 and 2 populations (n=45), we identified 13 CCSG that significantly stratified the cohort by overall survival (OS). High pre-dose levels of CD95 and TNFRSF10C were associated with better OS. CD95 was a better prognostic of OS than TNFRSF10C (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.10-4.67, p-value: 0.023). Low pre-dose levels of 11 CCSG were also significantly associated with favorable OS, with IL-8 being the most predictive (HR: 0.137, 95% CI: 0.0545-0.346, p-value: &lt;0.0001). Part 1 and 2 predose samples were also analyzed separately, and many of the biomarkers identified in the aggregate analysis retained significance in the separated analysis. In Part 1, CXCL5, IFN-alpha, and IL-18 emerged as unique markers, and in Part 2, CCL22 was the single unique marker.The results of our exploratory study identified several putative biomarkers of elraglusib clinical benefit and demonstrated potential immunomodulatory mechanisms of elraglusib that will be used to inform the further clinical development of elraglusib for the treatment of metastatic cancer. Citation Format: Taylor Weiskittel, Kelsey Huntington, Leiqing Zhang, Austin Koukol, Benedito A. Carneiro, Hu Li, Andrey Ugolkov, Wafik El-Deiry, Andrew Mazar. Identification of potential immune biomarkers for GSK-3 inhibitor elraglusib (9-ING-41) in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6426.

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly malignancy with a dismal 5-year survival rate, highlighting the urgent need to improve drug response and overcome primary or acquired (secondary) resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) is a target in PDAC and the GSK-3 inhibitor, elraglusib, has been shown to improve chemosensitivity of PDAC and survival in preclinical cancer models. In addition, data from phase II clinical trials in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer is demonstrating preliminary evidence of clinical benefit in patients receiving a combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. While this early evidence is highly encouraging, the biological determinants of elraglusib response are unknown. Using genome wide CRISPR/Cas9 library screening, we identify aurora kinase A (AURKA), an oncogenic kinase with major roles in mitosis, as a critical regulator for elraglusib sensitivity. Elraglusib treatment activates AURKA by inducing a G2/M cell cycle arrest. We show that knocking out AURKA reduces the phosphorylation of polo like kinase 1 (PLK1), arresting cells in mitosis, and leading to mitotic catastrophe and significant apoptosis after elraglusib treatment. Strikingly, the AURKA inhibitor, alisertib, works synergistically with elraglusib to inhibit PDAC cell line growth and induce apoptosis. In summary, our results demonstrate that targeting AURKA is an effective approach to sensitize PDAC tumors to elraglusib. Citation Format: Li Ding, Easton Maeder, Cheng Zhang, Taylor Weiskittel, Daniel Schmitt, Andrew Mazar, Hu Li, Daniel Billadeau. Genome wide CRISPR/Cas9 library screening identifies aurora kinase A as a regulator of elraglusib sensitivity in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4658.

Abstract Purpose: The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of elraglusib, a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) small-molecule inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies was studied. Patients and Methods: Elraglusib (intravenously twice weekly in 3-week cycles) monotherapy dose escalation was followed by dose escalation with eight chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine, doxorubicin, lomustine, carboplatin, irinotecan, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pemetrexed/carboplatin) in patients previously exposed to the same chemotherapy. Results: Patients received monotherapy (n = 67) or combination therapy (n = 171) elraglusib doses 1 to 15 mg/kg twice weekly. The initial recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of elraglusib was 15 mg/kg twice weekly and was defined, without dose-limiting toxicity observation, due to fluid volumes necessary for drug administration. The RP2D was subsequently reduced to 9.3 mg/kg once weekly to reduce elraglusib-associated central/peripheral vascular access catheter blockages. Other common elraglusib-related adverse events (AE) included transient visual changes and fatigue. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 55.2% and 71.3% of patients on monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Part 1 monotherapy (n = 62) and part 2 combination (n = 138) patients were evaluable for response. In part 1, a patient with melanoma had a complete response, and a patient with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma had a partial response (PR). In part 2, seven PRs were observed, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2–2.6] and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.7–8.4) months, respectively. Conclusions: Elraglusib had a favorable toxicity profile as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy and was associated with clinical benefit supporting further clinical evaluation in combination with chemotherapy.