Borad, Mitesh J.

249 Background: HA, a glycosaminoglycan in the tumor matrix, accumulates in 20-30% of solid tumors and ≥28%, ≥42% and ≥87% of colon, gastric and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) tumors, respectively. Tumors that accumulate HA can develop high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and are resistant to chemotherapy. HA in human PDA is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. In animal models, PEGPH20 reduced tumor-associated HA, tumor IFP and tumor growth, and increased efficacy of chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of PEGPH20 is being evaluated in Phase 1 (Ph1) trials. Methods: Two Ph1 studies in pts with advanced solid tumors refractory to prior therapy examined the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and MTD of single-agent IV PEGPH20. Dosing in Study 1 was 2x/wk and then reduced to q21d and in Study 2 is 1-2x/wk x 4wks and 1x/wk thereafter with dexamethasone pre-medication regimen. Biomarkers evaluated: Histochemistry to detect depletion of tumor HA, serum HA catabolites, Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI and FDG-PET. Results: In Study 1, the first 3 pts demonstrated musculoskeletal events (MSE; 2 pts dosed with 50 µg/kg 2x/wk, severe; 1 pt dosed with 0.5µg/kg 2x/wk, moderate) not predicted from GLP safety studies. The frequency of drug administration was reduced to q21d and the next 10 pts tolerated ≤1.5 µg/kg. In Study 2, dexamethasone pre-medication regimen was evaluated while dosing at 1-2x/wk. Nine pts were dosed ≤5.0 µg/kg. Doses ≤3.0 µg/kg administered 2x/wk were tolerated with intermittent Grade 1-2 MSE. Activity of PEGPH20 was reflected by increased HA serum catabolites. Pre- and post-dose biopsies from 2 colon pts demonstrated a 23-60% reduction in tumor HA after 4 wks of PEGPH20 dosing. DCE-MRI of PDA and FDG-PET of lung metastases increased tumor perfusion (Ktrans) and decreased metabolic activity 8 and 24hrs post-PEGPH20 dose and was still apparent after 4 wks of treatment with PEGPH20. Conclusions: Ongoing Ph1 studies have shown in vivo activity of PEGPH20 through HA plasma catabolites, tumor HA depletion, DCE-MRI and FDG-PET.

265 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is the standard treatment for first- line PanC. PanC is one of the most hypoxic solid tumors. TH-302 is an inert prodrug of brominated isophosphoramide mustard and undergoes selective activation in deep hypoxia. As a single agent, tumor responses were reported in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma, SCLC, and head/neck cancer at TH-302 weekly doses of 480-575 mg/m2. Methods: Eligible pts for the PanC expansion of this phase I/II study ( NCT00743379 ) had ECOG <1, locally advanced or metastatic PanC previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy other than adjuvant G, 5FU, and/or radiation. IV TH-302 was dosed at 240-575 mg/m2 (240 or 340 in expansion) with standard dose G (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Serum protein and microRNA hypoxia biomarkers were analyzed at baseline, start of cycle 3 and end of study. Results: 46 PanC subjects (12 locally advanced, 34 distant mets); median age: 63 (range 41-83); 24 male; ECOG 0/1 in 29/17 pts; RECIST response rate (RR) of 21%, median PFS of 6.1 mo (95%CI 4.8, 7.7) and median survival of 11.4 mo (95%CI 6.0, not reached) were observed. RR was 23% with median survival of 7.4 mo in pts with distant mets. 52% of pts had a >50% decrease in CA19-9. Common adverse events were skin or mucosal toxicity, nausea, fatigue and vomiting; most grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 68%, 64%, and 20% of pts respectively. The dose intensities at 240 mg/m2 and 340 mg/m2 were similar and related to hematologic toxicities. Skin toxicities were less common at 240 mg/m2. A TH-302 dose response was present with higher RR and PFS at 340 mg/m2. Initial serum hypoxia biomarkers did not identify a preferential pt population. Conclusions: The activity and clinical benefits of the combination of TH-302 with G in first line PanC are promising as compared to previous studies of G alone. TH-302 adds to the hematologic toxicity of G, but the regimen is well tolerated. The safety and activity provided rationale for comparing TH-302 plus G versus G alone in a randomized phase II trial ( NCT01144455 ) and indicate TH-302 may complement G by penetrating into the hypoxic regions of the PanC tumors where activation induces cytotoxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and lethal cancer characterized by high invasiveness, local and extensive dissemination at time of diagnosis and resistance to treatment. Few therapies have shown efficacy in the past and even standard of care therapies yield only modest improvements in the mortality of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Efforts have been undertaken to study the pancreatic tumor microenvironment and have established its complex and immunosuppressive nature which could explain the high resistance to chemotherapy. Novel therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment with an aim to decrease this resistance, improve immune tolerance and increase the efficacy of the current treatment have shown some promising preliminary results in preclinical and clinical trials. We review the current advances in the field of immunotherapy and their effectiveness as a potential treatment strategy in the pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Background: MRX34 is a liposomal nanoparticle formulation with an encapsulated mimic of the naturally occurring microRNA-34 (miR-34), which is lost or expressed at reduced levels in many tumors. miR-34 inhibits key oncogenic pathways by repressing multiple important oncogenes including BCL2, E2F3, HDAC1, MET, MEK1, CDK4/6, PDGFR-ɑ/β, SIRT1, WNT1/3, NOTCH-1, β-catenin, CD44, Nanog and AXL. miR-34 also represses the expression of PD-L1 and DGKζ, thereby possibly triggering an anti-tumor immune response and cancer cell death. A multicenter Phase 1 clinical trial of MRX34 is being conducted in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: Eligible patients were enrolled in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation study and were given a MRX34 starting dose of 10 mg/m2, administered intravenously (IV) twice weekly (BIW) for 3 weeks in 28-day cycles. Enrollment is ongoing into a second MRX34 dosing schedule, daily x 5 (QD x 5) in 21-day cycles. The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the two dosing schedules. Secondary objectives include assessments of safety, tolerability and the pharmacokinetic profile of MRX34 after intravenous dosing as well as to assess any biological and clinical activity. Results: As of July 2015, 75 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled and evaluable: 44 Caucasians, 47 males, a median age of 61 years and a median of 4 prior treatments. Histologies included 30 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 7 pancreatic cancer, 4 cholangiocarcinoma, 3 each of bladder, breast, colorectal, cervix and lung. The remaining 19 patients represented various other malignancies &lt;3 patients each. The 110 mg/m2 was deemed to be the MTD for the BIW dosing schedule. The MTD has not been determined yet for the QD x 5 schedule and dose escalation is continuing. The current dose levels are 70 mg/m2 QD x 5 for HCC and 93 mg/m2 QD x 5 for other solid tumors. The following treatment-emergent, all-causality adverse events (AEs) were most frequent among 47 patients in BIW cohorts vs 28 patients in QD x 5 cohorts: fever (64% vs 61%), fatigue (57% vs 39%), chills (57% vs 36%), back pain (55% vs 36%), nausea (49% vs 39%), diarrhea (43% vs 11%), headache (34% vs 14%), vomiting (32% vs 11%), anorexia (26% vs 14%), abdominal pain (23% vs 21%), dyspnea (23% vs 14%), insomnia (23% vs 14%), and dehydration (23% vs 4%). Most frequent grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were: lymphopenia (36% vs 71%), neutropenia (26% vs 36%), hyponatremia (26% vs 7%), AST elevation (26% vs 29%), leukopenia (23% vs 36%), hyperglycemia (19% vs 36%), thrombocytopenia (17% vs 29%), anemia (11% vs 21%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (11% vs 21%), and ALT elevation (9% vs 21%). One patient with HCC and another patient with melanoma achieved confirmed partial responses per RECIST. Conclusions: MRX34 has a manageable safety profile with confirmed partial responses in two patients with advanced HCC and melanoma. Due to better tolerability, QD x 5 schedule has been chosen for further study. Following MTD determination, enrollment will soon begin into the QD x 5 expansion cohorts for selected tumors. Citation Format: Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Andrew Brenner, Jasgit Sachdev, Samuel Ejadi, Mitesh Borad, Yang-Kon Kang, Ho Lim, T-Y Kim, Andreas Bader, Jay Stoudemire, Susan Smith, Sinil Kim, David Hong. Safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of MRX34, the first-in-class liposomal miR-34 mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr C43.

Abstract DMOT4039A, a humanized anti-mesothelin mAb conjugated to the antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), was given to patients with pancreatic and ovarian cancer every 3 weeks (0.2–2.8 mg/kg; q3w) or weekly (0.8–1.2 mg/kg). A 3+3 design was used for dose escalation followed by expansion at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics. Antitumor response was evaluated per RECIST 1.1 and serum CA19-9 or CA125 declines. Tumor mesothelin expression was determined by IHC. Seventy-one patients (40 pancreatic cancer; 31 ovarian cancer) were treated with DMOT4039A. For the q3w schedule (n = 54), the MTD and RP2D was 2.4 mg/kg, with dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia at 2.8 mg/kg. For the weekly schedule (n = 17), the maximum assessed dose was 1.2 mg/kg, with further dose escalations deferred because of toxicities limiting scheduled retreatment in later cycles, and therefore the RP2D level for the weekly regimen was determined to be 1 mg/kg. Across both schedules, the most common toxicities were gastrointestinal and constitutional. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 6 patients; 4 patients continued treatment following dose reductions. Drug exposure as measured by antibody-conjugated MMAE and total antibody was generally dose proportional over all dose levels on both schedules. A total of 6 patients had confirmed partial responses (4 ovarian; 2 pancreatic) with DMOT4039A at 2.4 to 2.8 mg/kg i.v. q3w. DMOT4039A administered at doses up to 2.4 mg/kg q3w and 1.0 mg/kg weekly has a tolerable safety profile and antitumor activity in both pancreatic and ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(3); 439–47. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background: Genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by Next-Generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied to guide clinical prognostic and therapeutic decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been limited to gene panels and whole exome based strategies due to challenges with time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, analyte quality, and ethical-legal-social issues (ELSI). Methods: Excisional or core tumor biopsies or bone marrow biopsies were obtained from consenting participants. Nucleic acid was extracted from fresh or frozen samples followed by WGS/WES/RNASeq on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 and bioinformatics analysis. Therapeutic targets were then prioritized by a multi-disciplinary Genomic Tumor Board (GTB) and CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH and/or IHC. Treatment was delivered using on/off-label FDA approved drugs, available clinical trials and single patient INDs. Results: We consented 64 and enrolled 35 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers. Median age was 59 (range 27-91) with 62% male. The majority had ECOG scores of 1 (94%). A median of 79 (range 28-8891) potentially functional somatic point mutations were identified in each case. One to two mutations/case were further identified as therapeutically targetable in 60% of the cases. The median time from tissue acquisition to CLIA validated results was 116 days (range 42-282) with CLIA validation of targets achieved in 21 of 22 patients. Genomic, target directed treatment was ultimately instituted in 13 patients utilizing: on/off label FDA approved drugs (n = 9), clinical trial (n = 3) and single patient IND (n = 1). Preliminary clinical efficacy was noted in 5 patients (2 PR, 3 SD). Integration of WES, long-insert WGS and RNA-Seq identified a case with an ERRFI1 mutant allele present in only 11% of the DNA reads while 82% of the RNA-Seq reads had the mutant transcript. The patient was treated with erlotinib and achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. In another case, a fusion between FGFR2-MGEA5 was observed in WES and RNA-Seq data leading to prioritization as a drug target. Reasons for patients not receiving targeted therapy included: inability to access treatment (n = 1), death prior to intended treatment (n = 3), results returned after death (n = 3), no targets identified (n = 2) and decision to pursue alternate therapy (n = 5). Conclusions: Integrating whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is not only feasible, but also valuable, in the prioritization and selection of potential targeted therapies for patients with advanced tumors. Continued barriers to broad application include the need for shorter time to reporting as well as broad availability of therapies through basket studies. Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, Jan Egan, Mia Champion, Katherine Hunt, Robert McWilliams, Ann McCullough, Jessica Aldrich, Sara Nasser, Winnie Liang, Michael Barrett, David Craig, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Carpten, A. Keith Stewart, Alan Bryce. Implementation of CLIA enabled integrated whole genome (WGS)/exome (WES)/transcriptome (RNAseq) next-gen sequencing to identify therapeutically relevant targets in advanced cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT112

Abstract Background: MRX34 is a liposome-formulated double-stranded mimic of tumor suppressor microRNA-34 (miR-34), which is lost or expressed at reduced levels in many solid and hematologic malignancies. miR-34 functions in the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and regulates the expression of more than 20 cancer-related genes including BCL2, E2F3, HDAC1, MET, MEK1, CDK4/6, PDGFR-ɑ, SIRT1, WNT1/3, NOTCH-1, β-catenin, CD44, Nanog and AXL. miR-34 also suppresses stem-like properties in cancer cells and sensitizes cancer cells to cytotoxic and targeted therapies. A multicenter phase I clinical trial of MRX34 is being conducted in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic cancer with liver involvement. Methods: Eligible patients are enrolled in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation study at MRX34 starting dose of 10 mg/m2, administered IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, and 18 of 28-day cycles. Dexamethasone premedication was added after the first 2 dose levels. The primary objective is to determine the RP2D, and secondary objectives include assessments of safety, PK and objective response rate (ORR). Response is evaluated by CT/MRI every 8 weeks. Once RP2D has been established, expansion cohort will be treated at the RP2D, with specific focus on determining biological response in tumor biopsy material. The latter will include assessing tumor uptake of miR-34 mimic and down-regulation of target gene expression as was observed in animal models of cancer. Results: Twenty-five patients received study drug, and enrollment is currently ongoing at the 5th dose level (70 mg/m2) and MTD has not been reached. There were 18 Caucasians, 15 males, with a median age of 62.5 years and a median of 4 prior treatments. Liposomal formulation-associated infusion reactions have been observed as characterized by the following treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) out of 20 patients: fever (13), chills (12), fatigue (12), thrombocytopenia (8), diarrhea (8), back/flank pain (6), nausea (6), and neutropenia (4). Most common Gr 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (3), fatigue (2), AST/ALT elevation (4) and back/flank pain (2). Addition of pre-dose dexamethasone with higher dose levels ameliorated infusion reactions. One patient died on study from disease progression. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the 2nd dose level (20 mg/m2; Gr 3 acute kidney injury associated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration) and one at the 5th dose level (70 mg/m2; Gr 3 increased AST). Conclusions: MRX34 has a manageable safety profile in patients with unresectable primary liver cancer or metastatic cancer with liver involvement. Determination of the R2PD, assessment of clinical response, and analyses of molecular markers are ongoing. Citation Format: Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Mitesh Borad, Jasgit Sachdev, David S. Hong, Susan Smith, Andres Bader, Jay Stoudemire, Sinil Kim, Andrew Brenner. Multicenter phase I study of MRX34, a first-in-class microRNA miR-34 mimic liposomal injection. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT327. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT327

Abstract Background: Whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing has revolutionized the ability to assess the genomic landscape of cancer and is increasingly being utilized for clinical decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been constrained by specimen quantity, analyte quality and the time from sample acquisition to results report. Methods: Patients with advanced cancers underwent surgical resection, excisional/core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing in addition to RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients for whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in a CLIA-enabled phase. Tumor types in the CLIA-enabled phase with the highest enrollment were pancreatic cancer (n=8) and cholangiocarcinoma (n=8). We sought to quantify the targets identified along with clinical benefit, defining these as the “Actionable Index” (AI) (proportion of patients with ≥ 1 putative drug target) and “Utility Index” (UI) (proportion of patients who derive clinical benefit). Putative therapeutic targets were identified in 7/8 (AI=0.88) cholangiocarcinoma (CC) patients and in 5/8 (AI=0.63) pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. All 3 CC patients who received target directed treatment achieved a partial response (UI=0.38). In contrast, none of the 4 PC patients who received target directed therapy had treatment response (UI=0.0). Interestingly no actionable targets were identified in 1 CC and in 2 PCs. One CC with an identified target was unable to access the drug and subsequently died. A CC patient and a PC patient, each with identified targets, expired prior to the initiation of therapy. Conclusions: While whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing is providing unparalleled detail of tumor genomes, the application to the clinic must be carefully considered. Actionability of targets will eventually need to be defined in close relation to eventual clinical utility and appropriate refinements to disease-gene-drug databases implemented. Preliminary observations in pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma demonstrate disparity in correlation between utility indices and actionable indices. Application of these tools in larger cohorts and types of tumors will need to be conducted to ascertain more precise estimates. Additional measures that are organ-site agnostic but pertain to specific targets (e.g. BRAF) will also need to be developed in order to facilitate more judicious application of sequencing in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Jan B. Egan, Alan H. Bryce, Mia D. Champion, Winnie S. Liang, Rafael Fonseca, Ann E. McCullough, Michael T. Barrett, Katherine Hunt, Rachel M. Condjella, Robert R. McWilliams, Stephen D. Mastrian, Janine LoBello, Daniel Von Hoff, David W. Craig, A. Keith Stewart, John D. Carpten, Mitesh J. Borad. Indices of actionability and clinical utility in a CLIA-enabled study of whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing in 33 cancer patients: Actionable vs. utility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4694. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4694

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a lethal hepatobiliary neoplasm originating from the biliary apparatus. In humans, CCA risk factors include hepatobiliary inflammation and fibrosis. The recently identified interleukin (IL)−1 family member, IL‐33, has been shown to be a biliary mitogen which also promotes liver inflammation and fibrosis. Our aim was to generate a mouse model of CCA mimicking the human disease. Ectopic oncogene expression in the biliary tract was accomplished by the Sleeping Beauty transposon transfection system with transduction of constitutively active AKT (myr‐AKT) and Yes‐associated protein. Intrabiliary instillation of the transposon–transposase complex was coupled with lobar bile duct ligation in C57BL/6 mice, followed by administration of IL‐33 for 3 consecutive days. Tumors developed in 72% of the male mice receiving both oncogenes plus IL‐33 by 10 weeks but in only 20% of the male mice transduced with the oncogenes alone. Tumors expressed SOX9 and pancytokeratin (features of CCA) but were negative for HepPar1 (a marker of hepatocellular carcinoma). Substantive overlap with human CCA specimens was revealed by RNA profiling. Not only did IL‐33 induce IL‐6 expression by human cholangiocytes but it likely facilitated tumor development in vivo by an IL‐6–sensitive process as tumor development was significantly attenuated in Il‐6–/– male animals. Furthermore, tumor formation occurred at a similar rate when IL‐6 was substituted for IL‐33 in this model. Conclusion: The transposase‐mediated transduction of constitutively active AKT and Yes‐associated protein in the biliary epithelium coupled with lobar obstruction and IL‐33 administration results in the development of CCA with morphological and biochemical features of the human disease; this model highlights the role of inflammatory cytokines in CCA oncogenesis. (Hepatology 2015;61:1627–1642)

Purpose TH-302 is an investigational hypoxia-activated prodrug that releases the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard in hypoxic settings. This phase II study (NCT01144455) evaluated gemcitabine plus TH-302 in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2), gemcitabine plus TH-302 240 mg/m2 (G+T240), or gemcitabine plus TH-302 340 mg/m2 (G+T340). Randomized crossover after progression on gemcitabine was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), tumor response, CA 19-9 response, and safety. Results Two hundred fourteen patients (77% with metastatic disease) were enrolled between June 2010 and July 2011. PFS was significantly longer with gemcitabine plus TH-302 (pooled combination arms) compared with gemcitabine alone (median PFS, 5.6 v 3.6 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87; P = .005; median PFS for metastatic disease, 5.1 v 3.4 months, respectively). Median PFS times for G+T240 and G+T340 were 5.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. Tumor response was 12%, 17%, and 26% in the gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 arms, respectively (G+T340 v gemcitabine, P = .04). CA 19-9 decrease was greater with G+T340 versus gemcitabine (−5,398 v −549 U/mL, respectively; P = .008). Median OS times for gemcitabine, G+T240, and G+T340 were 6.9, 8.7, and 9.2 months, respectively (P = not significant). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and peripheral edema (frequencies similar across arms). Skin and mucosal toxicities (2% grade 3) and myelosuppression (55% grade 3 or 4) were the most common TH-302–related AEs but were not associated with treatment discontinuation. Conclusion PFS, tumor response, and CA 19-9 response were significantly improved with G+TH-302. G+T340 is being investigated further in the phase III MAESTRO study (NCT01746979).