Holland, Ashley

Abstract Background In this longitudinal cohort study, we examined the socio-demographic and psychological predictors of alcohol use initiation during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of never alcohol users aged ≥21 prior to COVID-19. Methods Our study population consisted of 56 930 patients aged ≥21, as of 30 March 2019 were collected from a pre-COVID period of 1 year before 31 March 2020, and during-COVID, a period between 1 April 2020 and 30 March 2021. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to examine the roles of socio-demographic variables (gender, age, education, Area Deprivation Index and rural residence) changes in anxiety and depression severity as predictors of alcohol use initiation. Results Age, gender, race, ethnicity, education and rural status were significant predictors in multivariable analysis. A subgroup analysis showed neither anxiety nor depression had a significant association with alcohol use initiation. Conclusion Women, younger individuals, those living in a rural area and people who smoke cigarettes were more likely to initiate alcohol use during the pandemic. Our study has public health and clinical implications such as the need for targeted alcohol use screening and intervention for vulnerable individuals.

Abstract Background Research regarding the accuracy of co‐morbid psychiatric diagnoses in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is sparse. Yet correct diagnostic assignment is vital so that effective and appropriate treatment can be implemented, especially for the large numbers of individuals requiring expensive and restrictive behavioural health crisis services. Method A retrospective review of de‐identified data from multidisciplinary specialty team assessments completed for 50 individuals with ID (IntellectualDisability) with and without ASD and unresolved behavioural health challenges was conducted. The accuracy and reliability of the psychiatric diagnoses upon referral were compared with the diagnoses after the comprehensive team evaluation, and within‐individual diagnostic agreement was calculated. The agreement between the Mood and Anxiety Semi‐Structured interview tool (MASS) and the full team evaluation was also calculated. The influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on diagnostic agreement was explored. Results The most common chief complaints upon referral were aggression to others and self‐injurious behaviour. Individuals were taking a median of six medications (interquartile range: 5 to 7); 80% were taking an antipsychotic medication. The most common medical conditions were constipation (70%) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (52%). Measures of interrater reliability of the referral diagnoses with the team assessment were below 0.5 (kappa range: −0.04 to 0.39), with the exception of ruling out dementia (kappa = 0.85). The interrater reliability estimates for the MASS evaluations for depression and anxiety were higher (kappa = 0.69 and 0.64) and reflected higher sensitivity and PPV. The odds of any referral diagnosis being confirmed by team evaluation were low: 0.25 (range: 0 to 0.67). The level of diagnostic agreement for each patient was not significantly attributable to demographic or clinical characteristics, although effect sizes indicate a possible positive relationship to age and the number of prescribed psychotropic medications at referral. Conclusion Individuals in the current study had serious psychiatric and behavioural problems despite psychiatric care in their communities. The majority of psychiatric diagnoses provided upon referral were not supported by the multidisciplinary specialty team's assessment. In addition to possible diagnostic inaccuracy, the group in the study suffered from multiple medical co‐morbidities and were exposed to polypharmacy. Results emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation by clinicians with expertise in neurodevelopmental disabilities when people with ID with and without ASD have complex behavioural health needs that are unresponsive to usual care. In addition, based on agreement with the full team evaluation, the MASS shows promise as an assessment tool, especially with regards to identifying anxiety and depression.