Plager, Douglas A.

Abstract We investigated whether human IgM antibody, B7-DCXAb, which binds to B7-DC and enhances DCs' antigen uptake and retention, migration, and cytokine production, improves the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy. Mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of OVA or house dust mite (HDM) antigens plus alum and then treated by intravenous B7-DCXAb injection intranasal or sublingual administration of antigen. OVA-sensitized mice developed anti-OVA IgE and IgG1, Th2-type splenocyte responses to OVA; marked airway eosinophilic inflammation was observed after intranasal OVA challenge. When these mice were treated by intravenous B7-DCXAb plus intranasal OVA, anti-OVA IgE and IgG1 decreased by 75~95% within 1 week; this decrease persisted for >8 weeks. Anti-OVA IgG2a decreased transiently. Splenocyte production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in response to OVA was abolished; no increases in IFN-g or IL-17 were noted. In OVA-challenged mice, airway eosinophilia and lung levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 were reduced by >90%. Immunotherapeutic effects were also observed with intravenous B7-DCXAb plus sublingual OVA, but not with intravenous B7-DCXAb alone. Furthermore, HDM-sensitized mice were treated successfully by intravenous B7-DCXAb plus intranasal HDM. B7-DCXAb injection plus mucosal administration of antigen effectively treats allergic responses and may provide novel strategy for allergen immunotherapy.

Abstract Human eosinophil granule major basic protein (MBP1) is an exceedingly basic (isoelectric point >11) 14-kDa protein, comprising the core of the secondary eosinophil granule. Recently, a less cationic homolog of MBP, termed MBPH or simply, MBP2, has been discovered. We prepared a panel of mAbs to MBP2 and used these Abs to localize and quantitate this molecule in leukocytes and biological fluids. Specific mAbs for MBP2 were selected using slot-blot analyses and used in a two-site immunoassay, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence microscopy. The sensitivity of the immunoassay was markedly improved by reduction and alkylation of MBP2. MBP1 is more abundant than MBP2 in lysates of eosinophils and their granules, as judged by immunoassay and Western blotting. By immunofluorescence, MBP1 is present in eosinophils, basophils, and a human mast cell line (HMC1), whereas MBP2 is only detected in eosinophils. Neither MBP1 nor MBP2 could be detected in any other peripheral blood leukocyte. MBP2 levels measured in plasma and serum were essentially identical. In contrast to past measurements for MBP1, MBP2 was not detected above normal levels in sera from pregnant donors. However, measurement of serum MBP2 discriminated patients with elevated eosinophils from normal subjects, and MBP2 was also detectable in other biological specimens, such as bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, and stool. These results indicate that MBP2 is present only in eosinophils and that it may be a useful biomarker for eosinophil-associated diseases.

BackgroundStudies comparing the ability of staining methods to detect eosinophils in formalin‐fixed canine skin are lacking.Hypothesis/ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of eosinophil peroxidase monoclonal antibody (EPXmAb), Luna and haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to detect eosinophils in fixed canine skin by assessing the following parameters: (i) specificity of eosinophil staining; (ii) extracellular eosinophil granule staining; (iii) tissue background staining; (iv) contrast between eosinophil and surrounding tissue staining; and (v) differences in the number of eosinophils detected by each stain.MethodsThree serial sections of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissues of predominantly eosinophilic skin diseases (n = 8), noneosinophilic skin diseases (n = 7) and normal canine skin (n = 1) were stained with the three stains. Each parameter was independently assessed and scored by two investigators.ResultsLuna and EPXmAb were specific in detecting eosinophils. The EPXmAb was significantly more effective than Luna (P < 0.001) and H&E (P < 0.001) in its ability to detect extracellular eosinophil granules (i.e. to detect intact and released eosinophil granules). The EPXmAb showed significantly less background staining compared with Luna (P = 0.0005). Moreover, significantly more stain contrast was noted with EPXmAb compared with Luna (P = 0.003) and H&E (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean eosinophil counts among the three stains.Conclusion and clinical importanceThe three stains were shown to be useful to detect and quantify eosinophils in fixed canine skin. The EPXmAb‐based immunohistochemical stain proved to be a novel tool to detect eosinophils in canine skin.

Abstract Eosinophil granule proteins are deposited in cutaneous lesions in many human diseases, but how these proteins contribute to pathophysiology is obscure. We injected eosinophil cationic protein (ECP or RNase 3), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN or RNase 2), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and major basic protein-1 (MBP1) intradermally into guinea pig and rabbit skin. ECP and EDN each induced distinct skin lesions at ≥2.5 μM that began at 2 days, peaking at ∼7 days and persisting up to 6 wk. These lesions were ulcerated (ECP) or crusted (EDN) with marked cellular infiltration. EPO and MBP1 (10 μM) each produced perceptible induration and erythema with moderate cellular infiltration resolving within 2 wk. ECP and EDN localized to dermal cells within 2 days, whereas EPO and MBP1 remained extracellular. Overall, cellular localization and RNase activity of ECP and EDN were critical for lesion formation; differential glycosylation, net cationic charge, or RNase activity alone did not account for lesion formation. Ulcerated lesions from patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome showed ECP and EDN deposition comparable to that in guinea pig skin. In conclusion, ECP and EDN disrupt skin integrity and cause inflammation. Their presence in ulcerative skin lesions may explain certain findings in human eosinophil-associated diseases.