Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.

PURPOSE Breast density is a widely established independent breast cancer risk factor. With the increasing utilization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening, there is an opportunity to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) routinely. However, current available methods extrapolate VBD from two-dimensional (2D) images acquired using DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived by clinical centers because of storage constraints. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 nonactionable three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed DBT screening examinations acquired between 2011 and 2016. Reference tissue segmentations were generated using previously validated software that uses 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data. We developed a deep learning (DL) model that segments dense and fatty breast tissue from background. We then applied this model to estimate %VBD and absolute dense volume (ADV) in cm 3 in a separate case-control sample (180 cases and 654 controls). We created two conditional logistic regression models, relating each model-derived density measurement to likelihood of contralateral breast cancer diagnosis, adjusted for age, BMI, family history, and menopausal status. RESULTS The DL model achieved unweighted and weighted Dice scores of 0.88 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.08) and 0.76 (SD = 0.15), respectively, on the held-out test set, demonstrating good agreement between the model and 3D reference segmentations. There was a significant association between the odds of breast cancer diagnosis and model-derived VBD (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95 % CI, 1.13 to 1.77]; P = .002), with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.69). ADV was also significantly associated with breast cancer diagnosis (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.73]; P < .001) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71). CONCLUSION DL-derived density measures derived from 3D reconstructed DBT images are associated with breast cancer diagnosis.

Abstract Background: It has been widely established that breast density is an independent breast cancer risk factor. With the increasing utilization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening, there is an opportunity to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) routinely. However, current available methods extrapolate VBD from 2D images acquired with DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data which is rarely archived by clinical centers due to cost and storage constraints. This study aims to harness deep learning to develop a computational tool for VBD assessment based solely on 3D reconstructed, “for presentation” DBT images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 negative DBT screening exams (09/20/2011 - 11/25/2016) from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (mean age ± SD, 57 ± 11 years; mean BMI ± SD, 28.7 ± 7.1 kg/m2; racial makeup, 41.2% White, 54.2% Black, 4.6% Other), for which both 3D reconstructed and 2D raw DBT images (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc) were available. All available standard views (left and right mediolateral-oblique and cranio-caudal views) were included for each exam, leading to 7,850 DBT views. Corresponding 3D reference-standard tissue segmentations were generated from a previously validated software that uses both 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data to provide VBD metrics, shown to be strongly correlated with VBD measures from MRI image volumes. We based our deep learning algorithm on the U-Net architecture within the open-source Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework (GaNDLF) and created a 3-label image segmentation task (background, dense tissue, and fatty tissue). Our dataset was randomly split into training (70%), validation (15%) and test (15%) sets, while ensuring that all views of the same DBT exam were assigned to the same set. The performance of our deep learning algorithm against the corresponding reference-standard segmentations was measured in terms of Dice scores (DSC), with 0 signifying no overlap and 1 signifying perfect overlap, overall, as well as separately for each label. Results: After training was complete, our deep learning algorithm achieved a DSC of 0.78 on the validation, as well as on the test set. Our method accurately segmented background from breast tissue (DSC = 0.94) and demonstrated moderate to high performance in segmenting dense and fatty tissue, respectively (DSC = 0.49 and 0.89). Conclusion: Our preliminary analysis suggests that deep learning shows promise in the estimation of VBD using 3D DBT reconstructed, “for presentation” images. Future work involving transfer learning based on ground truth masks by clinical radiologists could further enhance this method’s performance. In view of rapid clinical conversion to DBT screening, such a tool has the potential to enable large retrospective epidemiologic and personalized risk assessment studies of breast density with DBT. Citation Format: Vinayak S. Ahluwalia, Walter Mankowski, Sarthak Pati, Spyridon Bakas, Ari Brooks, Celine M. Vachon, Emily F. Conant, Aimilia Gastounioti, Despina Kontos. Deep-learning-enabled volumetric breast density estimation with digital breast tomosynthesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1929.

e13538 Background: Breast density is considered a well-established breast cancer risk factor. As quasi-3D, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) becomes increasingly utilized for screening, there is an opportunity to routinely estimate volumetric breast density (VBD). However, current methods extrapolate VBD from 2D images acquired with DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived due to cost and storage constraints. Using a racially diverse screening cohort, this study evaluates the potential of deep learning for VBD assessment based solely on 3D reconstructed, “for presentation” DBT images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 negative DBT screening exams obtained between 2011 and 2016 from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (racial makeup, 41.2% White, 54.2% Black, 4.6% Other; mean age ± SD, 57 ± 11 years; mean BMI ± SD, 28.7 ± 7.1 kg/m2), for which both 2D raw and 3D reconstructed DBT images (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc) were available. Corresponding 3D reference-standard tissue segmentations were generated from previously validated software that uses both 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data to provide VBD metrics, shown to be strongly correlated with VBD measures from MRI image volumes. We based our deep learning algorithm on the U-Net architecture within the open-source Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework (GaNDLF) and created a 3-label image segmentation task (background, dense tissue, and fatty tissue). Our dataset was randomly split into training (70%), validation (15%) and test (15%) sets. We report on the performance of our deep learning algorithm against corresponding reference-standard segmentations for a cranio-caudal (CC) view-only subset. We also stratify our results by the two main racial groups (White and Black). Our evaluation measure was the weighted Dice score (DSC), with 0 signifying no overlap and 1 signifying perfect overlap, overall and separately for each label. Results: Our deep learning algorithm achieved an overall DSC of 0.682 (STD = 0.136). It accurately segmented the three labels of background, fatty tissue, and dense tissue, with DSC scores of 0.995, 0.884, and 0.617, respectively. DSC for White and Black women were 0.688 (STD = 0.127) and 0.680 (STD = 0.146), respectively. Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis suggests that deep learning shows promise in the estimation of VBD using 3D DBT reconstructed, “for presentation” CC view images and does not demonstrate bias among racial groups. Future work involving optimization of performance in other breast views as well as transfer learning based on ground truth masks by clinical radiologists could further enhance this method. In view of rapid clinical conversion to DBT screening, such a tool has the potential to enable large retrospective epidemiological and personalized risk assessment studies of breast density with DBT.