Lizak, Matthew

Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulators (HGNS) are used in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are unable to tolerate or do not respond to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. However, a subgroup of patients fail to achieve resolution of OSA with HGNS alone. Previous studies have shown that lower BMI, lower nadir oxygenation, decreased sleep latency, and higher VOTE score on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) predict better treatment outcome. We hypothesize that baseline diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) may further predict which patients will achieve successful therapeutic outcome with HGNS therapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who underwent HGNS implantation at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2019-2025 and had a pre-implantation diagnostic PSG available for review. Treatment success was defined by Sher Criteria: >50% reduction in post-treatment apnea hypopnea index (AHI) to a final AHI of < 20/hr. Responders met Sher criteria and non-responders did not meet Sher criteria. Demographics, sleep questionnaire results, PSG variables, and VOTE score on DISE were collected and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation of reduction in AHI. Results Twenty-three patients (11M/12F, median age: 69[IQR:64,75] years) met inclusion criteria. Median baseline AHI was 24[IQR:19,37]/hr. Median post-implant AHI was 8 [IQR:3, 14]/hr. Responders (n=15, 65%) and non-responders (n=8, 35%) demonstrated median post-implant AHI of 4.5[IQR:2.3,7.3]/hr and 15.7[IQR:12.3,28.5]/hr, respectively. Treatment response was associated with less time with SpO2 < 88% (T88%) (21min [IQR:3,64] vs. 73[IQR:36,105mins]; p=0.023) and higher central apnea index (CAI) (1[IQR:0.1,3] vs. 0[IQR:0,1], p=0.03) on pre-implantation PSG. Conclusion In this small cohort of OSA patients, less nocturnal hypoxemia as defined by T88% and higher baseline central apnea index were predictors of better treatment response to HGNS therapy as measured by Sher criteria. We hypothesize that greater nocturnal hypoxemia likely reflects more severe airway obstruction during sleep. Our analysis also showed that responders had higher baseline CAI than non-responders, however we believe this association is not clinically significant and likely driven by one outlier (CAI 13/hr). Further analysis in a larger HGNS cohort is needed to confirm these findings. Data enrichment efforts and more sophisticated analyses are underway. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction A previously published case report suggested that alcohol might cause false-negative results in home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) utilizing Peripheral Arterial Tonometry (PAT). Alcohol is consumed by nearly a third of people globally. Based on this, along with rapid growth in PAT HSAT utilization, we aimed to prospectively study the interaction between alcohol consumption and PAT HSAT technology. We hypothesized that alcohol use would significantly attenuate sleep disordered breathing metrics in contrast to existing literature suggesting alcohol may exacerbate sleep apnea. Methods We planned to recruit subjects (N=100) from Mayo Clinic Arizona sleep clinic who were being evaluated for sleep-disordered breathing and elected to undergo home sleep apnea testing (WatchPAT ONE). Participants were required to report social alcohol use (no more than 1-3 drinks per day). The first and second home sleep apnea test were conducted on separate nights (night 1: without alcohol; night 2: with alcohol). Patients also completed a questionnaire, detailing their normal alcohol intake as well as intake during the respective sleep tests. Statistical analysis included paired sample t-test as well as a descriptive analysis. Results A total of 75 subjects were recruited (mean age [± SD] 56.8 ± 11.9; 90.7% male; mean BMI 29.8 ± 5.8) and 56 patients completed both sleep tests. The mean apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was not statistically different (p=0.784) between night 1 and night 2 (without alcohol: 19.6/hour ± 21.0; with alcohol: 19.3 ± 21.5, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found in the AHI during REM and NREM sleep. Conclusion Preliminary data does not suggest a statistically significant difference in AHI without or with alcohol. While no significant change in AHI was observed, this study highlights the need for further investigation into the impact alcohol may have on PAT technology. Further analyses and data enrichment are underway. Support (if any) Mayo Foundation

Abstract Introduction Placing a magnet over a Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) or Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) may cause the device to pace asynchronously or inhibit tachyarrhythmia detection, respectively, potentially preventing delivery of electrical shocks. Manufacturers for masks used with positive airway pressure devices have started using magnets in place of more traditional headgear clips to connect the headgear to mask. Mask manufactures do not list presence of a PPM/ICD as a contraindication to use of a mask with magnet but do recommend keeping the mask some distance away from PPM/ICD. A published case series describes two patients with magnet response events captured during PPM/ICD interrogation that correlated with nightly use of CPAP. The authors were able to replicate the response by placing the mask with magnet directly over the patient’s pulse generate site. Although we advise all patients with implanted device to avoid use of masks with magnets, select patients refuse to stop using mask with magnets regardless of our policy. We, therefore, started offering these patients referral for PPM/ICD interrogation to evaluate for an interaction between mask with magnet and PPM/ICD as next best alternative. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients (n=10) referred for routine PPM/ICD interrogation to test whether the mask with magnet interacted with PPM/ICD when mask on face as during normal use (i.e., simulated normal use) or magnetic area of mask placed directly over the PPM/ICD (i.e., direct contact). Results Although no interaction was detected in any patient (n=10) with simulated normal use (0 %), one interaction was documented with direct contact (10 %). Conclusion Although simulated normal use of masks with magnets did not demonstrate any interactions, it is concerning that one patient (10 % of patients) demonstrated an interaction with direct contact of magnetic area of mask over the PPM/ICD. It is not uncommon for patients to remove a mask during the night while sleeping. This preliminary data along with the published case series calls for further research and increased awareness of this potential interaction for both sleep and cardiac health care providers. Support (If Any) None