Krowka, Michael J.

Abstract Patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have an increased cardiovascular and overall mortality risk when undergoing liver transplantation (LT). However, such risk is not captured in their Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) laboratory score. POPH MELD exception criteria were established in 2006 with the aim of prioritizing these patients for LT prior to pulmonary hypertension (PH) progression and eventual right heart failure. The original criteria emphasized a posttreatment, pre‐LT mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <35 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <400 dynes‐s‐cm−5 or <5 Wood units (WU). Since 2006, there have been important advances in the treatment of POPH with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)–targeted therapies and newer evidence regarding LT outcomes and risk factors for perioperative mortality. Specifically, PVR rather than mPAP has been shown to be more strongly associated with outcomes, including mortality. In addition, among treated patients with POPH, mPAP may be persistently elevated related to an elevated cardiac output or other factors that do not necessarily reflect POPH disease severity. Thus, in February 2021, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network approved proposed modifications to POPH MELD exception criteria, now allowing either of the following posttreatment, pre‐LT hemodynamic profiles: mPAP less than 35 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 400 dynes‐s‐cm−5 (or less than 5 WU) or mPAP greater than or equal to 35 mm Hg and less than 45 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 240 dynes‐s‐cm−5 (or less than 3 WU). This article reviews the history of the POPH MELD exception criteria, describes the recent modifications to the exception criteria and the evidence supporting them, and highlights unanswered questions and areas for future research.

Compared to idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have worse survival. Health disparities may contribute to these differences but have not been studied. We sought to compare socioeconomic factors in patients with POPH and IPAH and to determine whether socioeconomic status and/or POPH diagnosis were associated with treatment and health‐care utilization. We performed a cross‐sectional study of adults enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry. Patients with IPAH (n = 344) and POPH (n = 57) were compared. Compared with IPAH, patients with POPH were less likely to be college graduates (19.6% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.02) and more likely to be unemployed (54.7% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001) and have an annual household income below poverty level (45.7% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001). Patients with POPH had similar functional class, quality of life, 6‐min walk distance, and mean pulmonary arterial pressure with a higher cardiac index. Compared with IPAH, patients with POPH were less likely to receive combination therapy (46.4% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.03) and endothelin receptor antagonists (28.6% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.001) at enrollment with similar treatment at follow‐up. Patients with POPH had more emergency department visits (1.7 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.009) and hospitalizations in the six months preceding enrollment (1.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.02). Both POPH diagnosis and lower education level were independently associated with a higher number of emergency department visits. Compared to IPAH, patients with POPH have lower socioeconomic status, are less likely to receive initial combination therapy and endothelin receptor antagonists but have similar treatment at follow‐up, and have increased health‐care utilization.

Background. Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that develops in the setting of portal hypertension, affects 5%–6% of patients with liver disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) threshold of 35 mm Hg is used to stratify perioperative risk and liver transplant eligibility in treated POPH patients but does not take into account the specific factors that contribute to the pressure elevation. Methods. In this case series, we describe the characteristics and posttransplant outcomes of patients with treated POPH and an mPAP ≥35 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <250 dynes-s-cm−5 at or just before liver transplantation (LT). We also describe the effect of PAH therapy on pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with POPH. Results. Sixteen patients were included. All patients were on PAH therapy at the time of LT. PAH therapy resulted in a decrease of mPAP (median 18.4%; interquartile range [IQR] 8.9%–27.0%) with a reduction in PVR (median 50.5%; IQR, 45.4%–70.7%), and an increase in both cardiac output (CO) (median 28.1%; IQR 5.7%–63.8%) and PAWP (median 50.0%; IQR 16.7%–108.3%) before LT. One year posttransplant survival was 69% (11/16); however, only 1 death was attributed to POPH. At 1-year posttransplant, 63.6% (7/11) of patients were weaned off all PAH therapy with clinical and echocardiographic resolution of POPH. Conclusions. In treated POPH patients with an mPAP ≥35 mm Hg and PVR < 250 dynes-s-cm−5 before LT, 1-year posttransplant survival was 69% and the majority of patients were able to discontinue PAH therapy.

Background. Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is the presence of pulmonary arterial (PA) hypertension in patients with portal hypertension and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In a cohort of POPH patients, we describe the clinical outcomes of POPH patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT). Methods. Retrospectively collected data from a prospectively assembled cohort of all consecutive POPH adults evaluated in 3 transplant centers from 1996 to 2019. Results. From a cohort of 228 POPH patients, 50 patients underwent LT. Significant hemodynamic improvement after PA-targeted therapy was observed, with 58% receiving only monotherapy pretransplant. After LT, 21 (42%) patients were able to discontinue and remained off PA-targeted therapy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-y unadjusted survival rates after LT were 72%, 63%, and 60%, respectively. An elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) before LT was associated with worse survival rate (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.07-3.74, P = 0.04). No survival difference was observed in those granted MELD exception or transplants performed before or after the year 2010. Conclusions. Significant number of POPH patients discontinued PA-targeted therapy after LT. Higher PVR before LT was associated with worse survival, as was monotherapy use. Despite effective PA-targeted therapies, POPH survival outcomes after LT in our cohort were modest and may reflect the need for more aggressive therapy.

AbstractObjectivesFailure to produce sufficient quantities of functional α1-antitrypsin (AAT) can result in AAT deficiency (AATD) and significant comorbidities. Laboratory testing plays a vital role in AATD, with diagnosis requiring documentation of both a low AAT level and a mutated allele. This retrospective evaluation examines the efficacy of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (proteotyping)–based algorithm for AATD detection.MethodsA 16-month retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts: 5,474 samples tested with the proteotype-based algorithm and 16,147 samples directly tested by isoelectric focusing (IEF) phenotyping.ResultsLC-MS/MS reduced the rate of IEF testing by 97%. The 3% of cases reflexed to IEF resulted in 12 (0.2%) additional phenotype findings. Retrospectively applying the proteotype-based algorithm to the IEF cohort demonstrated a 99.9% sensitivity for the detection of deficiency-associated phenotypes. Most deficiency phenotypes missed by the proteotyping algorithm would come from heterozygous patients with an F, I, or P paired to an S or Z. In all of these cases, patient AAT levels were greater than 70 mg/dL, above the threshold for AAT augmentation therapy.ConclusionsThe proteotype algorithm is a sensitive and cost-effective approach for the diagnosis of clinical AAT deficiency.