Hooper, Jody E.

Context.— After-death care can be complicated and time-consuming for clinical staff, and frustrating for bereaved families. Delays and errors can have damaging legal and reputational consequences for hospitals. Offices of Decedent Affairs (ODAs) have been proposed as a solution, and their potential benefits have been described in several single institution reports. The literature lacks a contemporary and comprehensive review of existing ODAs and their approaches. Objective.— To describe the process of establishing a new ODA and to provide a snapshot of the spectrum of structure, function, and impact of existing ODAs in the United States. Design.— A survey was administered to 11 established ODAs spread across the continental United States. Programs were identified through the College of American Pathologists Autopsy Committee and a Medical Autopsy Listserv. Results.— Eleven ODAs returned the survey, representing more than 190 cumulative years of experience in decedent care in the hospital setting (median, 10 years). There was a wide range in staffing (both staff size and background) as well as scope of services offered. The median ratio of hospital deaths to full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing was 360 deaths per FTE. Respondents reported that ODAs unburden clinical providers and facilitate decedent management. Some respondents reported a quicker turnover of hospital beds and shorter intervals between pronouncement of death and autopsy. ODAs increased autopsy rates when the autopsy services were part of the ODA. Conclusions.— This survey provides practical information for hospitals considering establishing a new ODA and useful benchmarks for existing ODA programs.

Context.— Decedent Affairs Offices and Programs can serve as an avenue to assist medical centers in facilitating efficient and comprehensive decedent management, despite a paucity of literature on their roles, establishment, and efficacy. Objective.— To characterize the motivations and rationales for establishing Decedent Affairs Offices. Design.— A survey was administered to 11 established Decedent Affairs Offices/Programs, identified through the College of American Pathologists Autopsy Committee and a Medical Autopsy Listserv. The questions comprehensively cover establishment, operations, and outcomes data available by institution. Results.— Survey respondents reported the rationale for starting their programs and the benefits such offices can have. Conclusions.— Decedent Affairs Offices and Programs provide a useful option to medical centers to navigate the increasingly complex task of comprehensive decedent management. The present survey helps to delineate the similarities and differences between these programs at 11 institutions, to aid nascent programs in their establishment and growth over time.

Objective Autoantibodies are clinically useful in phenotyping patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Gastrointestinal (GI) function is regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS) and commonly impaired in SSc, suggesting that the SSc autoimmune response may target ENS antigens. We sought to identify novel anti‐ENS autoantibodies with an aim to clinically phenotype SSc GI dysfunction. Methods Serum from a patient with SSc with GI dysfunction but without defined SSc‐associated autoantibodies was used for autoantibody discovery. Immunoprecipitations performed with murine myenteric plexus lysates were on‐bead digested, and autoantigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Prevalence was determined, and clinical features associated with novel autoantibodies were evaluated in a SSc cohort using regression analyses. The expression of gephyrin in human GI tract tissue was examined by immunohistochemistry. Results We identified gephyrin as a novel SSc autoantigen. Anti‐gephyrin antibodies were present in 9% of patients with SSc (16/188) and absent in healthy controls (0/46). Anti‐gephyrin antibody–positive patients had higher constipation scores (1.00 vs 0.50, P = 0.02) and were more likely to have severe constipation and severe distention/bloating (46% vs 15 % , P = 0.005; 54% vs 25%, P = 0.023, respectively). Anti‐gephyrin antibody levels were significantly higher among patients with severe constipation (0.04 vs 0.00 ; P = 0.001) and severe distention and bloating (0.03 vs 0.004 ; P = 0.010). Severe constipation was associated with anti‐gephyrin antibodies even in the adjusted model. Importantly, gephyrin was expressed in the ENS, which regulates gut motility. Conclusion Gephyrin is a novel ENS autoantigen that is expressed in human myenteric ganglia. Anti‐gephyrin autoantibodies are associated with the presence and severity of constipation in patients with SSc.

Context.— Organ weights are an essential part of autopsy analysis. Deviations from normal organ weights provide important clues to disease processes. The assessment of normal organ weights depends on reliable reference tables, but most widely available reference tables are based on data that are either decades old or derived from relatively small sample sizes. Objective.— To provide an updated reference table of organ weights based on contemporary sources and a large sample size. Design.— Organ weights from 4197 carefully screened autopsies performed on adults at the Palm Beach County Medical Examiner's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida, and the Mayo Clinic Hospital in Rochester, Minnesota. Results.— Height and body weight data in this study reflect the well-recognized increases in both variables, but most particularly in body weight, seen during the last decades. The study data show a strong positive association between organ weight and body weight for the heart, liver, and spleen. There is a similar but weaker association between body weight and the weight of the lungs and kidneys. Brain weight is independent of body weight but shows a strong negative association with age. Even when controlling for body weight, men's organs are heavier, except for the weight of the liver, which is comparable in men and women. These associations are in agreement with the findings of previous studies. The current study suggests that, for some of the commonly weighed organs, there has been an increase in median organ weight when compared with existing references. Conclusions.— The tables presented here provide an updated reference that should prove useful to autopsy pathologists in the forensic and hospital settings.