Kramer, Joel H.

ImportancePlasma phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217), a biomarker of Alzheimer disease (AD), is of special interest in corticobasal syndrome (CBS) because autopsy studies have revealed AD is the driving neuropathology in up to 40% of cases. This differentiates CBS from other 4-repeat tauopathy (4RT)–associated syndromes, such as progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) and nonfluent primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), where underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is typically the primary neuropathology.ObjectiveTo validate plasma p-tau217 against positron emission tomography (PET) in 4RT-associated syndromes, especially CBS.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicohort study with 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up recruited adult participants between January 2011 and September 2020 from 8 tertiary care centers in the 4RT Neuroimaging Initiative (4RTNI). All participants with CBS (n = 113), PSP-RS (n = 121), and nfvPPA (n = 39) were included; other diagnoses were excluded due to rarity (n = 29). Individuals with PET-confirmed AD (n = 54) and PET-negative cognitively normal control individuals (n = 59) were evaluated at University of California San Francisco. Operators were blinded to the cohort.Main Outcome and MeasuresPlasma p-tau217, measured by Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence, was validated against amyloid-β (Aβ) and flortaucipir (FTP) PET. Imaging analyses used voxel-based morphometry and bayesian linear mixed-effects modeling. Clinical biomarker associations were evaluated using longitudinal mixed-effect modeling.ResultsOf 386 participants, 199 (52%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 68 (8) years. Plasma p-tau217 was elevated in patients with CBS with positive Aβ PET results (mean [SD], 0.57 [0.43] pg/mL) or FTP PET (mean [SD], 0.75 [0.30] pg/mL) to concentrations comparable to control individuals with AD (mean [SD], 0.72 [0.37]), whereas PSP-RS and nfvPPA showed no increase relative to control. Within CBS, p-tau217 had excellent diagnostic performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for Aβ PET of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P < .001) and FTP PET of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00; P < .001). At baseline, individuals with CBS-AD (n = 12), defined by a PET-validated plasma p-tau217 cutoff 0.25 pg/mL or greater, had increased temporoparietal atrophy at baseline compared to individuals with CBS-FTLD (n = 39), whereas longitudinally, individuals with CBS-FTLD had faster brainstem atrophy rates. Individuals with CBS-FTLD also progressed more rapidly on a modified version of the PSP Rating Scale than those with CBS-AD (mean [SD], 3.5 [0.5] vs 0.8 [0.8] points/year; P = .005).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, plasma p-tau217 had excellent diagnostic performance for identifying Aβ or FTP PET positivity within CBS with likely underlying AD pathology. Plasma P-tau217 may be a useful and inexpensive biomarker to select patients for CBS clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundPreviously, we found that female sex is associated with greater pathology burden in early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) in the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS). Here, we have expanded our analyses by adding APOE‐ε4 carrier status as a further predictor of EOAD pathologic burden.MethodWe included 180 EOAD LEADS participants with available APOE genotype, Flortaucipir PET, Florbetaben PET, and MRI data. Demographic and biomarker differences were analyzed using ANOVA. EOAD participants were split by sex and APOE‐ε4 carrier status. Box plots were created in R and a voxel‐wise multiple linear regression in SPM12 yielded statistical brain maps of gray matter density (GMD), amyloid and tau burden.ResultCompared to males, EOAD females showed significantly greater global amyloid uptake (mean SUVR, p=0.002) and greater tau SUVR in the MetaROI, Braak 3&4 and 5&6 regions (p=0.0007, p=0.001, p=0.01, resp., Table 1). Female APOE‐ε4 carriers showed greater tau SUVR in Braak regions 1&2 than female non‐carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2B). Male APOE‐ε4 carriers showed trend‐level thinner entorhinal cortex than male non‐carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). Interestingly however, femaleAPOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater global amyloid SUVR than female carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2A). Further, APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed significantly thinner medial temporal cortices than carriers in both sexes (M, p<0.05; F, p<0.01). Male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers also showed significantly lower mean cortical thickness than male carriers (p<0.05, Figure 1). Female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed trend‐level lower mean cortical thickness than female carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). The FWE corrected SPM12 maps showed significantly greater GM atrophy in the right temporal lobe and greater amyloid burden in a right lateralized occipitoparietal pattern in female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers compared to female carriers. Further, male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater tau uptake in the left frontal lobe than male carriers (Figure 3).ConclusionThese results suggest that APOE‐ε4 non‐carrier status is associated with greater atrophy, amyloid and tau deposition in EOAD. This might be due to the presence of other strong genetic drivers of disease pathology in EOAD.

AbstractBackgroundMotor disturbances are common in patients with a variety of neurodegenerative and neurological syndromes, such as Parkinson’s disease and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD). Accurately quantifying motoric changes could enable earlier detection and monitoring of these syndromes, and remote quantification may allow for more frequent assessments and may improve access to research for underrepresented and geographically dispersed participants. With these benefits in mind, investigators from the ALLFTD consortium developed smartphone tests of balance and finger tapping speed. Here we present preliminary test‐retest reliability and associations with gold standard tests.MethodThe tasks were analyzed in two independent samples. The first was an in‐person cohort of healthy older adults (n = 7), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 1) and FTD (n = 3) who completed the smartphone standing/balance and finger tapping tests (FTT) twice in person. The second sample included 31 ALLFTD participants with a range of clinical presentations (healthy older adults [n = 11], FTD [n = 5], MCI [n = 2], unknown [n = 13]) who were asked to complete the balance test three times over two weeks at home. The primary outcomes were total taps for the FTT and root mean squared acceleration for the balance test. Test‐retest reliability was calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); given the small sample size, outliers (n = 6) were removed from the balance test. We tested the association of smartphone FTT with the gold standard mechanical FTT and the balance task with the CDR®+NACC‐FTLD‐SB (disease severity) using Spearman’s correlations. A Wilcoxon‐sign rank test compared participants with motor features on the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS>0) to those without (PSPRS = 0).ResultThe smartphone FTT showed good test‐retest reliability (ICC = 0.78) and a strong correlation (r = 0.8,p<0.05) with mechanical FTT. The test‐retest reliability for the balance task was excellent for the remote sample (ICC = 0.97) and in‐person (ICC = 0.89) samples. In the remote sample, greater acceleration was correlated with higher CDR®+NACC‐FTLD‐SB (r = 0.7,p = 0.003), and participants with motor features on the PSPRS had higher acceleration than those without (W = 11,p = 0.04).ConclusionThese findings provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the ALLFTD Mobile App tests of motor function. Replication in a larger sample is required.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a collection of neurodegenerative diseases affecting behavior, cognition, and motor functions. FTD treatment trials will benefit from sensitive assessments capable of detecting and longitudinally tracking cognitive changes. Remote smartphone cognitive tests may improve the sensitivity to detect and monitor cognitive decline via novel methods of data capture and more frequent assessments within ecologically valid environments, while simultaneously reducing patient burden. The first step in determining the utility of these measures is establishing their reliability. We previously reported baseline reliability estimates for the ALLFTD Mobile App cognitive tests in a small pilot sample. Here we extend these results using a larger sample and evaluate six‐month stability.MethodWe enrolled a diagnostically mixed sample of 128 participants (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [n = 84]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 21]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD≥1 [n = 23]) from ongoing studies of healthy aging (Hillblom Network) and frontotemporal dementia (ALLFTD). Participants self‐administered five cognitive tests from the ALLFTD Mobile App on their own smartphone; they were asked to complete each test three times within two weeks. Tests included gamified versions of N‐back, Stroop, Flanker, and Go/No‐Go paradigms, and an adaptive short‐term memory test. We evaluated the internal consistency of each test’s first occurrence using Spearman‐Brown split‐half reliability (100 simulations). Test‐retest reliability over the first three baseline replicates (as available) was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlations (ICC). In a preliminary analysis, we tested the six‐month stability of test performance in nine functionally intact participants who completed baseline and follow‐up Flanker, N‐Back, and adaptive memory assessments by calculating Spearman’s rho.ResultSplit‐half reliability estimates were in the good to excellent range (r’s: 0.81–0.97). Test‐retest reliability estimates were in the adequate to excellent range (ICCs: 0.72–0.96). ICC estimates were comparable for participants with and without clinical impairment (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 (0.74–0.95) and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD >0 (0.67–0.95). Among functionally intact individuals, baseline and 6‐months scores were highly correlated (r’s: 0.76–0.93, p’s<.05).ConclusionOur findings of adequate to excellent internal consistency, test‐retest reliability, and 6‐month stability support the feasibility of remote, smartphone‐based cognitive testing among a diagnostically mixed sample typical of healthy aging and frontotemporal dementia research studies.

AbstractBackgroundRemote digital cognitive assessments validated for use in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and other neurodegenerative diseases would benefit clinical trials and clinical care. The ALLFTD Mobile App includes several smartphone‐based measures of cognition, and prior studies have provided preliminary support for their reliability. Here we evaluate their validity by testing associations with gold standard clinical outcomes and expected neural correlates.MethodA diagnostically mixed sample of 92 participants (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [n = 33]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 15]; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD≥1 [n = 16]; unknown [n = 28]) were recruited from a UCSF healthy aging study (Hillblom Network) and a North American FTD study (ALLFTD). Participants were asked to remotely complete four ALLFTD Mobile App tests of executive functioning (EF) and a memory test on their smartphones. Gold standard clinical measures were also collected; outcomes were the UDSv3 EF composite, CVLT‐SF Total Immediate Recall (memory), and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Score (disease severity). Volumetric brain MRI measurements were available for a subset (n = 37). Expected neural correlates were frontoparietal gray matter volume for EF tests and hippocampal volume for the memory test. Linear models were fitted to evaluate the association of app tests with the gold standard outcomes, controlling for education, sex, and total intracranial volume (imaging only).ResultSmartphone EF measures were strongly and positively associated with the UDS3‐EF composite (ß’s = 0.6–0.8, all p<.001). The memory test was strongly correlated with the CVLT‐SF (ß = 0.7, p<.001). Tests were less strongly associated with divergent cognitive domains (e.g., associations with a visuospatial test were ß’s = 0.1–0.3). Worse performance on all tests was significantly associated with greater disease severity (ß’s = 0.5–0.7, all p<.001). Worse app‐based EF scores were associated with lower frontoparietal volume (ß’s = 0.4–0.6, all p<.015) and worse memory scores with lower hippocampal volume (ß = 0.5, p<.001).ConclusionALLFTD Mobile App scores were strongly associated with gold standard neuropsychological tests of the same cognitive domain (i.e., convergent validity) and less associated with measures of a different domain (i.e., divergent validity). Worse performance on the smartphone tests was associated with increasing disease severity and volume loss in expected brain regions. These results provide preliminary support for the construct validity of the ALLFTD Mobile App cognitive tests.

ImportancePhysical activity is associated with cognitive health, even in autosomal dominant forms of dementia. Higher physical activity is associated with slowed cognitive and functional declines over time in adults carrying autosomal dominant variants for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), but whether axonal degeneration is a potential neuroprotective target of physical activity in individuals with FTLD is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the association between physical activity and longitudinal neurofilament light chain (NfL) trajectories in individuals with autosomal dominant forms of FTLD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included individuals from the ALLFTD Consortium, which recruited patients from sites in the US and Canada. Symptomatic and asymptomatic adults with pathogenic variants in one of 3 common genes associated with FTLD (GRN, C9orf72, or MAPT) who reported baseline physical activity levels and completed annual blood draws were assessed annually for up to 4 years. Genotype, clinical measures, and blood draws were collected between December 2014 and June 2019; data were analyzed from August 2021 to January 2022. Associations between reported baseline physical activity and longitudinal plasma NfL changes were assessed using generalized linear mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline age, sex, education, functional severity, and motor symptoms.ExposuresBaseline physical activity levels reported via the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. To estimate effect sizes, marginal means were calculated at 3 levels of physical activity: 1 SD above the mean represented high physical activity, 0 SD represented average physical activity, and 1 SD below the mean represented low physical activity.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAnnual plasma NfL concentrations were measured with single-molecule array technology.ResultsOf 160 included FTLD variant carriers, 84 (52.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 50.7 (14.7) years. A total of 51 (31.8%) were symptomatic, and 77 carried the C9orf72 variant; 39, GRN variant; and 44, MAPT variant. Higher baseline physical activity was associated with slower NfL trajectories over time. On average, NfL increased 45.8% (95% CI, 22.5 to 73.7) over 4 years in variant carriers. Variant carriers with high physical activity demonstrated 14.0% (95% CI, −22.7 to −4.3) slower NfL increases compared with those with average physical activity and 30% (95% CI, −52.2 to −8.8) slower NfL increases compared with those with low physical activity. Within genotype, C9orf72 and MAPT carriers with high physical activity evidenced 18% to 21% (95% CI, −43.4 to −7.2) attenuation in NfL, while the association between physical activity and NfL trajectory was not statistically significant in GRN carriers. Activities associated with higher cardiorespiratory and cognitive demands (sports, housework, and yardwork) were most strongly correlated with slower NfL trajectories (vs walking and strength training).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, higher reported physical activity was associated with slower progression of an axonal degeneration marker in individuals with autosomal dominant FTLD. Physical activity may serve as a primary prevention target in FTLD.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

AbstractBackgroundThe overarching goal of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer Disease study (LEADS) is to optimally characterize early‐onset AD (EOAD) and establish an EOAD clinical trials network. Here we report the baseline demographic and imaging biomarker comparisons of the LEADS cohort to late‐onset AD (LOAD) subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3).Method123 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 47 amyloid‐negative EOnonAD, 60 cognitively normal young controls were compared to 130 amyloid‐positive LOAD, 110 amyloid‐negative LOnonAD and 286 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal older controls. To account for the effect of cognitive aging between EO and LO populations, each cognitive measure was Z‐transformed. Cortical and hippocampal atrophy were quantified using W‐scores adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume. Z‐scores and W‐scores were compared using t‐test or Wilcoxson rank test as appropriate. All p‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate correction.ResultEOAD showed greater pathology burden and greater cortical atrophy (AD signature) relative to LOAD. EOAD also showed greater cognitive impairment across all cognitive tests. EOAD showed greater functional impairment, more depression but less neuropsychiatric behaviors overall compared to LOAD (Table 1 and Figure 1, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses stratified by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.EOnonAD differed from LOnonAD by also showing greater impairment on all cognitive and functional measures There were no significant differences in amyloid and tau burden, or atrophy W‐scores between these groups. EOnonAD were more depressed and showed more functional impairment compared to LOnonAD (Table 2 and Figure 2, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses split by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.ConclusionConsistent with our preexisting hypotheses, EOAD and EOnonAD perform much worse relative to their LO counterparts. EOAD also show greater pathological burden as expected. The reported analyses were done in chronological rather than disease time (time since disease onset). Benchmarking individuals along the disease spectrum might prove to be a better strategy especially when conducting analyses on rate of disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundIn preparation for treatment trials in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), sensitive assessments to detect early clinical deficits and track longitudinal changes are needed. Remote digital data collection using smartphones may improve sensitivity to detect and follow abnormalities by allowing novel methods of data capture and more frequent assessments. Furthermore, remote evaluations can reduce patient and staff burden. Despite these benefits, little is known about the reliability and validity of self‐administered cognitive testing completed on smartphones.MethodWe investigated self‐administered smartphone cognitive tests from the ALLFTD Mobile App in a mixed sample of 45 participants, including 10 functionally intact older adults, 24 participants from families harboring pathogenic FTD mutations (asymptomatic n=14; mildly symptomatic n=10;), and 11 symptomatic FTD‐spectrum participants. A subset (n=15) was missing CDR®+NACC‐FTLD data but consensus diagnoses were available. Participants were asked to complete five tests that were repeated three times over eight days. Tests included versions of N‐back, Stroop, Flanker, and Go/No‐Go paradigms, and an adaptive spatial working memory test. Reliability was assessed using split‐half reliability (first testing session, 100 simulations) and intraclass correlations (ICC) across the three testing sessions. Linear models were fitted to evaluate the association of test performance with age and disease severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Global and Box Scores), covarying for sex and education level. Models evaluating age associations excluded symptomatic participants.ResultParticipants completed 72.4% of available instruments. Split‐half reliability (range: 0.76 to 0.97) and ICCs (0.70 to 0.92) suggested adequate‐to‐excellent internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Across the five tests, negative associations were observed with CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Scores (ßs = ‐0.24 to ‐0.77), and in clinically asymptomatic individuals, negative associations were observed with age (ßs = ‐0.43 to ‐0.88). Performance on all measures was worse in symptomatic participants compared to asymptomatic (p‐values<.05). Mildly symptomatic cases (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD=0.5) performed worse on Stroop, Flanker, and spatial working memory than asymptomatic participants (p‐values<.03). Flanker and Stroop tasks consistently showed the strongest reliability and validity findings.ConclusionSmartphone adaptations of common neuropsychological tests produced promising preliminary results. Strong associations with disease severity and age suggest these metrics may be valid for detecting clinically relevant cognitive changes, even in mildly symptomatic FTD.

AbstractPatients with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are commonly excluded from large‐scale observational and therapeutic studies due to their young age, atypical presentation, or absence of pathogenic mutations. The goals of the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS) are to (1) define the clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker characteristics of EOAD; (2) develop sensitive cognitive and biomarker measures for future clinical and research use; and (3) establish a trial‐ready network. LEADS will follow 400 amyloid beta (Aβ)‐positive EOAD, 200 Aβ‐negative EOnonAD that meet National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA‐AA) criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia, and 100 age‐matched controls. Participants will undergo clinical and cognitive assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18F]Florbetaben and [18F]Flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET), lumbar puncture, and blood draw for DNA, RNA, plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post‐mortem assessment. To develop more effective AD treatments, scientists need to understand the genetic, biological, and clinical processes involved in EOAD. LEADS will develop a public resource that will enable future planning and implementation of EOAD clinical trials.