Fortuni, Federico

Abstract Objectives The progression of extra-mitral valve (MV) cardiac damage in patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) following surgical repair has not been described. We aimed to investigate the evolution of extra-MV cardiac damage after MV repair and to assess its prognostic significance. Methods Patients with severe primary MR undergoing surgical repair at 5 referral centres were included when echocardiographic follow-up assessment was available. Based on echocardiographic parameters at baseline and at a median follow-up of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-11) months after MV repair, patients were hierarchically classified as follows: stage 0: no cardiac damage; stage 1: left ventricular dilatation and/or dysfunction; stage 2: left atrial dilatation and/or atrial fibrillation; stage 3: pulmonary hypertension and/or significant tricuspid regurgitation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results A total of 764 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years, 70% men) were included. Compared to baseline, 43% improved at least 1 stage, 49% remained unchanged, and 8% worsened at least 1 stage during follow-up after MV repair. At a median follow-up of 91 months after MV repair, 94 patients (12%) died. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, extra-MV cardiac damage staging at follow-up (HR per-1-stage-increase = 1.571; P = .009) and cardiac damage evolution (improved group, HR = 0.467; P = .034; worsened group, HR = 2.481, P = .037) were independently associated with all-cause mortality and had incremental prognostic value over preprocedural assessment. Conclusions Extra-MV cardiac damage improves significantly after MV repair, and its evolution is independently associated with all-cause mortality, suggesting the importance of comparative echocardiographic assessment following MV repair to improve risk stratification.

Abstract Aims The current definition of post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) left ventricular (LV) remodelling is purely structural (LV dilatation) and does not consider LV function (ejection fraction, EF), even though it is known to be a predictor of long-term post-STEMI outcome. This study aimed to reclassify LV remodelling after STEMI by integrating LV dilatation and function (LVEF) and to investigate the prognostic implications. Methods and results Data from an ongoing registry of STEMI patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively evaluated. Four distinct remodelling subgroups were identified: (i) no LV dilatation, no LVEF impairment,(ii) no LV dilatation but LVEF impairment, (iii) LV dilatation but no LVEF impairment, and (iv) LV dilatation and LVEF impairment. The impact of functional LV remodelling on outcomes was analysed. A total of 2346 patients were studied (mean age 60 ± 11 years, 76% men). During a median follow-up of 76 (interquartile range 52 to 107) months, 282 (12%) died, while the composite of death and heart failure hospitalization occurred in 305 (13%) patients. Those with LV remodelling and LVEF impairment had a significantly lower survival rate (P < 0.001) and event-free survival rate (P < 0.001) compared with other functional LV remodelling groups. Conclusions Employing a functional LV post-infarct remodelling classification has the potential to improve risk stratification beyond structural LV remodelling alone. Identification of patients with the worst prognosis by using a functional LV remodelling approach may allow institution of early preventative therapies.