Chaisidhivej, Natapat

81 Background: Recent data suggest an association between cardiovascular disease burden and biliary cancer patients. However, the outcomes of hospitalized patients for biliary-pancreatic malignancy with concurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are not well understood. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of ADHF on patients hospitalized for biliary-pancreatic malignancy. Methods: We used the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to study patients hospitalized for biliary tract and pancreatic malignancy with concurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) identified by ICD-10 CM codes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for predefined outcomes were determined via multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome examined was inpatient mortality, while secondary outcomes included complications related to various body systems. Results: We identified 43,009 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of biliary tract and pancreatic cancer. The mean age was 68.5 years; 49.4% were female. Caucasians accounted for 68%, followed by Hispanics (13%). Of these, 6.27% (3,699/43,009) had a concurrent diagnosis of heart failure. In the survey's multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis, accounting for patient and hospital confounding factors, ADHF demonstrated significant associations with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.63; 95% CI 1.09, 2.44, p = 0.015). In addition, a significant association between ADHF and various adverse in-hospital outcome was observed including prolonged mean length of stay (Beta 1.45; 95% CI 0.67, 2.24, p < 0.001), increased mean total hospital cost (Beta 3,757; 95% CI: 2,641, 36,630, p = 0.024), elevated risk of shock (aOR 2.75; 95% CI: 1.77, 4.26, p < 0.001), higher risk of sepsis (aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.68, p = 0.018), increased risk of acute respiratory failure (aOR 3.18, 95% CI: 2.25, 4.51, p < 0.001), and heightened risk of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.24, 1.99, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for biliary-pancreatic malignancy, concurrent ADHF is linked to increased mortality risk and various in-hospital adverse complications. Additional long-term studies are required for a comprehensive understanding of this association.

80 Background: Disparities in health outcomes exist among racial and ethnic groups in the United States, notably in patients with colon cancer. Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. However, data on the metastasis risks and clinical outcomes on hospitalized individuals with colon cancer is still limited. Therefore, we aim to assess the association between metastatic colon cancer and racial differences. Methods: We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to explore patients who have colon cancer as the primary diagnosis. Additionally, we identified evidence of metastasis, as recorded by ICD-10-CM. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was racial differences in organ metastasis and secondary outcomes included mortality and length of stay. Statistical significance was established at p-value of 0.05. Results: We identified 80,130 patients with primary diagnosis of colon cancer at discharge. The mean age was 67.4 years; 49.7% were female. Caucasians accounted for 69.3%, with African Americans at 13.3% and Hispanics at 8.2%. 15% of the patients had liver metastasis, whereas 22% had lung metastasis. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for patient, COVID-19, chemotherapy usage and hospital factors, African Americans had higher risk of lung metastasis (aOR 1.22; 95%CI (1.07, 1.40), p = 0.003), higher risk of liver metastasis (aOR 1.51; 95%CI (1.31, 1.74), p = 0.021) and longer length of stay (b = 0.95; 95%CI (0.56, 1.33), p = 0.001). Hispanics also had higher risk of lung (aOR 1.22, p < 0.05) and liver metastasis (aOR 1.24, p = 0.021). We observed an increase in risk of metastasis and mortality but non-statistically significant in some parameters and races, as shown in table provided. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study revealed that racial difference is associated with higher risk of metastasis, as well as other outcomes. To establish a causal relationship between races, metastasis, and mortality in patients with colon cancer, further longitudinal research is necessary. [Table: see text]

Abstract INTRODUCTION Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is safe and beneficial in elderly patients. However, the association of dementia, which is a growing cause of mortality in the elderly, remains unexplored. We aim to understand the impact of dementia when EGD is utilized, in the elderly population group. METHODS We utilized the 2020 National Inpatient Sample to investigate records admitted with EGD utilization identified through ICD-10 CM codes. We divided records by the presence of dementia. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for predefined outcomes were determined using multivariable logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for comorbidities. The primary outcome assessed was inpatient mortality, while secondary outcomes included cost and length of stay, as well as other inpatient complications. RESULTS We identified 507,829 hospitalizations with ages more than 60. The mean age was 74.5 and males constituted 49.9%. In a survey multivariable logistic and linear regression model adjusting for patient and hospital factors, the presence of dementia is associated with lower inpatient mortality (aOR 0.79, 95%CI (0.68, 0.91), p = 0.002), lower hospitalization costs (beta coefficient -1,958, 95%CI (-2,653, -1,353), p <0.001), lower mechanical ventilation usage (aOR 0.87, 95%CI(0.78, 0.97), p < 0.001) but higher odds of mental status change (aOR 2.24, 95%CI (2.09, 2.40), p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (beta coefficient 0.52, 95%CI (0.30, 0.74), p <0.001),. Post-propensity matching revealed similar patterns. CONCLUSION The presence of dementia is associated with a lower risk of inpatient mortality, and other clinical outcomes, in hospitalization with EGD utilizations. Etiologies behind this relationship should be explored to understand this inverse relationship.

Although most patients with hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, its infection is generally underdiagnosed and overlooked. In immunocompromised patients, HEV infection can lead to acute liver failure and death. However, the clinical evidence of HEV infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is scarce; thus, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of HEV infection in this population. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception through October 2020 to identify studies that reported the prevalence of HEV infection among HSCT recipients. HEV infections were confirmed by HEV-IgG/IgM or HEV-RNA assay. A total of 1977 patients from nine studies with a follow-up time up to 40 months were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of positive HEV-RNA was 3.0% (95% CI 2.3% to 4.0%). The pooled prevalence of positive HEV-IgG was 10.3% (95% CI 4.5% to 21.8%). The pooled prevalence of de novo HEV infection was 2.9% (95% CI 1.8% to 4.5%). Age and male gender were not associated with HEV-RNA or HEV-IgG positivity in the meta-regression analysis. In conclusion, the prevalence of HEV-IgG in HSCT recipients was about 10%, while the prevalence of HEV-RNA was only 3%. However, further studies that focus on the clinical outcomes in this population are warranted.