Gupta, Mamta

Abstract Abstract 1999 Recurrent chromosomal translocations involving the IGH locus are characteristic of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and MALT lymphoma in particular has been pathologically characterized by specific IGH translocations. However, these translocations are present in only a subset of cases, suggesting that additional uncharacterized translocations might exist. In previous studies we characterized the novel t(X;14)(p11.4;q32) translocation in a patient with MALT lymphoma and found that GPR34, an orphan G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), was highly expressed due to its juxtaposition to the IGHSA2 switch region. Although the t(X;14)(p11;q32) translocation was only identified in one patient, we wanted to determine its expression across a spectrum or normal and malignant lymphoma tissue, as other mechanisms may contribute to overexpression of genes. We measured GPR34 mRNA expression by quantitative PCR in tissue biopsies from a panel of lymphomas. As controls, we also measured GPR34 mRNA expression in normal resting or activated CD19+ B cells, resting and activated CD3+ T cells, and CD14+ monocytes. Expression of GPR34 was significantly increased in MALT (37-fold, n=35), LPL (23-fold, n=23), nodal marginal zone B cell lymphoma (18-fold, n=21), and splenic marginal zone B cell lymphoma (21 fold, n=33) compared to resting CD19+ B cells (n=11). In a gastric MALT lymphoma specimen we detected GPR34 expression at levels similar to the t(X;14)(p11;q32) patient and interphase FISH studies showed an extra intact GPR34 signal, but no translocation involving IGH or GPR34, suggesting that other mechanisms, including gene dosage effect, can upregulate GPR34. The receptor encoded by GPR34 is most similar to the PY2 receptor subfamily of GPCRs and signaling studies suggest that overexpression of GPR34 results in an accumulation of inositol phosphates and MAP-kinase activation. To further characterize the impact of GPR34 overexpression on cell signaling, HeLa cells were transduced with WT GPR34, a signaling deficient GPR34 (GPR34 DRY), or a vector control. To determine if MAPK activity was upregulated, the phosphorylation status of ERK1/2 in GPR34 WT, GPR34 DRY, and vector control cells was analyzed and we found that ERK1/2 was constitutively phosphorylated at higher levels (1.6-fold) in GRP34 WT cells compared to GRR34 DRY or vector control cells. To further explore which signaling pathways were affected by GPR34 overexpression, GPR34 WT or vector control cells were transfected with an AP-1, CRE, NF-kB, E2F, SRE, NFAT, or ISRE- luciferase reporter plasmid. GPR34 expressing cells had increased luciferase activity driven by AP-1 (5.35-fold), CRE (4.7-fold), NF-kB (2.6-fold), and E2F (2.1) when compared to vector control cells. GPR34 DRY was unable to activate these pathways. AP-1 and CRE have been implicated in a large variety of cellular processes, including transformation, and both AP-1 and CRE activity is induced upon activation of MAP kinases. In untreated cells, both AP-1 and CRE activity were significantly higher in GPR34 WT cells compared to GPR34 DRY cells and both AP-1 and CRE luciferase activity was inhibited by the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059, suggesting that activation of these pathways is MAP-kinase dependent. To determine the biologic impact of GRP34 overexpression, the proliferation rates of vector control, GPR34 WT, and GPR34 DRY cells were compared and we found that proliferation of GPR34 WT cells was significantly higher (5.6-fold) than that seen in GPR34 DRY cells. We next tested the effect of the MEK inhibitor on proliferation and saw a dose dependent decrease in proliferation of GPR34 WT expressing cells. These results suggest that GPR34-mediated proliferation is dependent on MAPK. The presence of elevated GPR34 expression in tumors and the increased proliferation mediated by GPR34 suggests that it may have oncogenic potential. We therefore tested the ability of GPR34 WT cells to generate tumors in a tumor colony-forming assay. Only the GRP34 WT cells had the ability to form tumors in soft agar suggesting that overexpression of GPR34 can result in tumor formation. Taken together, our results identify a novel translocation in MALT lymphoma, emphasize a novel role for GPR34 in tumor cell growth, and suggest that MEK inhibitors may be useful in a subset of translocation-harboring or GRP34 high-expressing tumors. Disclosures: Fonseca: Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and is characterized by deregulation of several signal transduction pathways. Approximately 50% patients with DLBCL are shown to have aberrant activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. However, mechanism of aberrant STAT3 signaling in DLBCL is not well understood. Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are important enzymes that control the activity of multiple signaling pathways downstream of tyrosine kinases; mutations in PTPN11 have been found associated with the development of myeloproliferative disorder. In the current study, we sequenced a set of 38 DLBCL tumor samples for genetic mutations of PTPN6. Bi-directional sequencing reactions were performed on genomic DNA, and all exons of PTPN6 were amplified and analyzed by Sanger sequencing. We identified 2 novel heterozygous missense mutations in PTPN6 gene in 2 separate patients (2/38; 5.2%). The first missense mutation occurred in the exon 7, resulted in an Asp226 to lysine substitution (N226K), while other missense mutation found on exon 15 resulted in an Ala552 to valine substitution (A552V). In order to elucidate the functional significance of these mutations, we performed site directed mutagenesis to mutate wild type (WT) PTPN6 at codon 226 and 552. Both, wild-type PTPN6 (PTPN6WT) or those containing the N226K (PTPN6N226K) and A552V (PTPN6A552V) mutations were cloned and stably expressed in the HEK-293T cells with a lentiviral expression vector and PTPN6 phosphatase activity was measured. Our results showed marked reduction (70%) in the PTPN6 phosphatase activity in both the PTPN6 mutants as compared to the WT control. Interestingly both the PTPN6 mutants (PTPN6N226K and PTPN6A552V) promoted cell proliferation of HEK-293 cells as compared to WT PTPN6. In order to evaluate that whether or not PTPN6 mutations modulate STATs signaling, we analyzed STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 and STAT6 phosphorylation at tyrosine residue in cells stably transfected with WT or mutant PTPN6. While overexpression of WT PTPN6 reduced STAT3 phosphorylation, however no effect was observed on STAT1, STAT5 and STAT6 phosphorylation. Unlike WT-PTPN6, none of the PTPN6 mutants was able to dephosphorylate STAT3. In addition, PTPN6 A552V mutation was found to decrease the ability of PTPN6 to dephosphorylate STAT3 after induction with interleukin-10. Furthermore JAK2/JAK1 inhibition through the pharmacological inhibitor ruxolitinib (5μM) dephosphorylated STAT3 in WT PTPN6 as well as in PTPN6 mutants within 4 hours. Inhibition of JAK3 through a pharmacological inhibitor WHI-P154 (5μM) was able to completely dephosphorylated STAT3, however both the PTPN6 mutants were found resistant to JAK3 inhibition. Moreover, in a luciferase reporter assay compared to WT PTPN6, expressing either of the PTPN6 mutants (N226K and A552V) enhanced transcriptional activity of STAT3. To determine the effect of the PTPN6 mutations on the downstream targets of the JAK/STAT pathway, we demonstrated that Mcl-1, survivin and Bcl-2 protein level was significantly elevated in both mutant cells than that seen in the WT PTPN6 cells. Overall these results demonstrate that the N226K and A552V PTPN6 mutations occur in 5% of DLBCL tumors. Mutations we have found are both able to cause loss-of-function of PTPN6 that leads to increased STAT3 phosphorylation and increased transcriptional activity resulting in accumulation of Mcl-1, Bcl-2 and survivin proteins. Our data suggest that clinical trials of JAK1/JAK2 inhibitors need not be restricted to tumors with PTPN6 mutations but rather should focus on tumors with demonstrated aberrant STAT3 activation. Taken together, our data suggest that PTPN6 mutations may guide the clinical use of inhibitors of JAK3 kinase in DLBCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1575 We recently demonstrated in a phase II study that the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody epratuzumab added to RCHOP improved DLBCL survival parameters. Despite these advances, 30–40% of DLBCL patients still relapse and die of disease. Recent advances have led to the identification of a variety of intracellular oncogenic pathways as potential targets for lymphoma therapy. Specifically, many studies have found that activation of the Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway promotes tumor cell survival in various types of cancers. STAT3 is a transcription factor and exerts its anti-apoptototic effect through several downstream targets such as MYC. MYC protein can be expressed in lymphoma cells with or without the presence of MYC translocation. The frequency of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and MYC expression and their prognostic relevance are unknown within diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes. This study studied the tumor cell expression of pSTAT3 and MYC by IHC paired with serum cytokine levels in a DLBCL patient population uniformly treated on N0489. DLBCL tumor samples (n=38) were stained for detection of nuclear pSTAT3 expression. Using a threshold of ≥30% of tumor nuclei staining positive, 35 % (14/40) of tumors were pSTAT3+. An additional 17% (7/40) had between 10–30% pSTAT3+ cells. Non-malignant tonsil tissues (n=10) were positive for tSTAT3 in all cases but all but one case were pSTAT3 negative. Twenty-four of the same DLBCL tumors used for pSTAT3 expression were stained for MYC and 50% (12/24) were MYC positive (all nuclear) as defined by the criteria of ≥30% of cells staining positive. In cases (n=23) where both MYC and pSTAT3 IHC were performed, a positive pSTAT3 was more likely to have MYC expression whereas a positive MYC stain did not inform pSTAT3. By using a break apart probe for the MYC gene, MYC translocations in the major breakpoint regions were found in 10% (3/29) of cases. When MYC FISH was correlated with MYC IHC in the 24 DLBCL cases that had both techniques performed, all 3 MYC translocation cases were GCB by IHC, two were strongly positive for MYC by IHC, and 1 was negative. Among the 21 MYC FISH negative cases, 10 were MYC positive by IHC. These data suggest that MYC expression in lymphoma is not only controlled by genetic events such as translocations but also by other signaling pathways such as STAT3. pSTAT3 expression was correlated with an elevated serum LDH (p=0.0007). Neither MYC or pSTAT3 tumor expression correlated with other clinical or pathological features. Survival analysis revealed a trend toward shorter EFS for DLBCL patients whose tumors expressed MYC protein by IHC (p=0.2) or had a MYC translocation (p=0.09) by FISH; pSTAT3 expression status did not predict EFS (p=0.9). Within the GCB group 10 cases were MYC negative (10/17; 59%) and 7 cases were MYC positive (7/17; 41%). Among the non-GCB group 83% (5/6) were MYC positive. These data clearly suggest a trend of higher MYC positivity in the non-GCB DLBCL group (p=0.07). MYC positive cases had a clear trend of inferior EFS in both GCB (p=0.2) and in non-GCB (p=0.5) groups. The distribution of pSTAT3 (n=38) expression was also evaluated in the GCB (n=26) and non-GCB (n=12) DLBCL. In the GCB group 27% (7/26) were pSTAT3 positive compared to 58% (7/12) in the non-GCB group. Thus, there was a clear trend toward higher pSTAT3 positivity in non-GCB DLBCL tumors (p=0.06); however, pSTAT3 status did not correlate with EFS in either GCB or non-GCB DLBCL patients. In the present study we correlated pretreatment serum cytokines levels of these patients with pSTAT3 and MYC tumor cell expression. Out of the 30 cytokines tested, the only pre-treatment cytokines that were significantly correlated with pSTAT3 expression were IL-10 (p=0.05), G-CSF (p=0.03) and TNFa (p=0.04); none were correlated with MYC expression. Overall, our data provide evidence that over-expression of pSTAT3 and MYC is common in DLBCL. These biomarkers have potential as prognostic factors in the case of MYC and as a tool for selecting therapy for pSTAT3. MYC may be especially useful to further identify an adverse group of DLBCL patients within the otherwise favorable GCB tumor group. The availability of JAK/STAT and STAT-specific inhibitors provides the rationale to incorporate pSTAT3 staining in tumors from patients who are participating in these trials to learn if this biomarker can predict response Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Epigenetic silencing of tumor-suppressor genes has potential therapeutic relevance if the diagnostic and prognostic utility of particular DNA methylation patterns could be established. SHP1 is a tumor-suppressor gene that can be downregulated in various neoplasms. The aims of this study are (i) whether SHP1 was lost/ suppressed in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (ii) Understanding the role of various epigenetic mechanisms including CpG hypermethylation and histone modifications in SHP1 loss, and (iii) whether SHP1 in DLBCL can be re-expressed with epigenetic therapy. We initially analyzed SHP1 mRNA expression in DLBCL (n=9) patient specimens and normal B-cells by QRT-PCR. Decreased expression of SHP1 mRNA was observed in all the DLBCL patient samples as compared to normal B cells. DLBCL tumor samples (n=37) along with normal tonsils (n=10) were stained for SHP1 protein by immunohistochemistry (IHC). SHP1 expression was lost or suppressed in 53% of DLBCL tumors compared to normal controls. These data, when taken together, confirm that SHP1 is strongly expressed in normal B-cells and can be lost or suppressed in DLBCL tumors. We performed epigenetic studies of SHP1 CpG promoter 2 (named CPG1 P2) in 37 DLBCL tumors and 6 DLBCL cell lines by methylation specific (MSP1) PCR and pyrosequencing methods. Surprisingly, SHP1 CpG1 P2 hypermethylation (0/37) was not detected in patient samples or cell lines by both methods. Our data conclusively demonstrate that SHP1 CpG1 P2 hypermethylation is absent in DLBCL tumors. The finding that SHP1 was lost or silenced in many of the clinical samples without finding any CpG1 P2 hypermethylation led us to extend our methylation studies to a novel, more proximal CpG island within P2 (named CpG2) that has not been previously studied in any hematological malignancies. We designed the primers specific for these CpG2 sites and ran the pyrosequencing on the same 37 DLBCL tumors as used above for CpG1 methylation. Using a cut off of >25% (intermediate to high methylation) 57% (21/37) of patient samples were methylated. The Ly3, Ly10, and DHL2 DLBCL cell lines were also hypermethylated at CpG2. To confirm the role of CpG2 methylation in SHP1 expression, we treated the Ly3 and DHL2 cells with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-Azacytidine (Aza). We observed increased SHP1 expression compared to untreated control cells in Ly3 and DHL2 cells followed by a progressive demethylation of SHP1 CpG2, as shown by positive U-MSP with increasing amplification intensity. This resulted in a corresponding down-regulation of activated STAT3 in a similar time dependent manner. Treatment of Ly3 and DHL2 cells with 5-Aza for 0-6 days significantly (p=0.0008 for Ly3 and p=0.03 for DHL2) reduced the cell survival (40% decrease at day 6). To further investigate epigenetic control of SHP1 in DLBCL, we proceeded to study whether histone modifications in the SHP1 promoter were involved in the regulation of SHP1 expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed in the Ly3, Raji cell line and normal B cells, by using antibodies to repressing marks on histones. We observed that the SHP1 promoter in the Ly3 and Raji cells was enriched for both H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 repressing marks as compared to normal B cells. To confirm the role of histone modifications in SHP1 expression, we treated Ly3 cells with the histone methyltransferase inhibitor (HMT) DZNEP and the HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (Novartis Pharmaceuticals). DZNEP has been shown to be very specific for histone suppressive marks H3K27me3 that are mediated through EZH2. Treatment with DZNEP partially reverted the H3K27me3 histone marks in the SHP1 promoter followed by increased the SHP1 expression in Ly3 cells. LBH589 treatment was not able to inhibit H3K27me3 marks, but was able to inhibit the CpG2 methylation within the SHP1 promoter 2 alone or in combination with 5- Aza. In conclusion, these data provide a comprehensive characterization of the epigenetic mechanisms leading to SHP1 deregulation in the DLBCL tumors. These findings support the notion that control of SHP1 P2 in DLBCL tumors is associated with both DNA promoter methylation and histone methylation, which explains our results that treatment with 5-Aza, DZNEP and LBH589 could reactivate SHP1 expression and inhibit DLBCL cell survival. Therefore, SHP1 may prove useful diagnostic and prognostic marker and provide a rationale to use epigenetic therapy for patients with DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Blood cytokine elevations have been associated with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) such as follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although other types of NHL have been studied, to our knowledge, cytokine deregulation in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has not been comprehensively studied. In this study, we studied cytokine levels in untreated and relapsed MCL patients using a multiplex assay to determine the role of dysregulated cytokines in these patients and study any prognostic relevance that could be drawn from their effect on relapse and survival. Samples from two data sets of MCL patients were used for this study. The first dataset was pre-treatment serum samples from newly-diagnosed patients with MCL (n=88) from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource. The second dataset included pre-treatment plasma samples from relapsed MCL patients (n=20) treated on the MC0048G clinical trial studying the effect of everolimus in lymphoma patients. In addition, unrelated controls from a case-control study of lymphoma were included (n=15 serum, n=24 plasma). Thirty cytokines were assessed using a multiplex ELISA. Differences between cytokines in cases and controls were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; associations between cytokines and event-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. In the newly diagnosed MCL patients, IL-10 (p<0.0001), IL-1RA (p=0.001), IL-6 (p= 0.04), sIL-2Rα (p=0.005), and MIG (p=0.002) were elevated compared to normal controls. The only significantly elevated cytokine in the recurrent MCL cases compared to controls was sIL-2Rα (p= 0.0006). High levels (above median) of sIL-2Rα levels were associated with inferior event-free-survival (EFS) in both newly diagnosed (HR=2.61 (95% CI: 1.41-4.81, p= 0.0022) and relapsed MCL (HR=2.90, 95% CI: 1.08-7.80, p=0.035) patients; this remained significant after adjusting for MIPI (p=0.01 and 0.03, respectively). Moreover, in the relapsed MCL group eotaxin (p< 0.0001), IL-12 (p< 0.0001), and MCP-1 (p= 0.0002) were suppressed compared to normal controls. We hypothesized that STAT3 (pSTAT3) in MCL cells might be the possible cause behind IL-12 suppression. Indeed, 12/13 MCL samples from IL-12-suppressed relapsed MCL patients were pSTAT3+. When studying the association between cytokine levels and clinical characteristics in both untreated and relapsed MCL groups, sIL-2R was significantly associated with the MIPI score in both untreated (p<0.0001) and relapsed (p=0.007) MCL groups; and with performance status (p=0.005), lymphoma stage (p=0.004), and B symptoms (p=0.006) in the newly diagnosed MCL group.Figure 1Event-free survival of patients with untreated and relapsed MCL by sIL-2R levels.Figure 1. Event-free survival of patients with untreated and relapsed MCL by sIL-2R levels. Our study shows that cytokines are deregulated in both untreated and relapsed MCL patients. It emphasizes on the importance of sIL-2R in its association with negative clinical parameters and worse prognosis in MCL. These findings gives the rational for using sIL-2R along with MIPI and other parameters in predicting prognosis and further to monitor response in MCL. Furthermore, we showed that IL-12 is suppressed in relapsed MCL group and that pSTAT3 expression is a possible mechanism behind this suppression. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of drugs that suppress pSTAT3 expression in IL-12 suppressed MCLs and disease progression in relapsed MCL patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 925 Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) consists of biologically distinct subtypes: Germinal Center B-cell (GCB)–like and Activated B-cell (ABC)-like. Studies to date suggest that patients with tumors that have ABC features have an inferior survival; therefore, it is important to develop new therapies specifically for ABC-type DLBCL based on mechanistic differences. It has been shown that the ABC-DLBCL has high levels of total and phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) protein and this STAT3 activity may play a role in the survival of ABC-DLBCL cells. Indeed, when ABC and GCB cell were incubated with the novel JAK2 inhibitor TG101348 (TargeGen, San Diego, CA) we found potent cytotoxicity (LD50 2μM) in ABC DLBCL but not in GCB DLBCL. This provides further rationale to study the regulation of STAT3 in the survival of ABC type DLBCL cells. In studies of HDAC expression in ABC DLBCL cells, we found over-expression of the class 1 histone deacetylases, specifically HDAC1 and HDAC3. We then performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to learn the functional interaction between STAT3 and HDACs. We found that STAT3 formed complexes with HDAC1 to a greater extent than HDAC3. We also showed that STAT3 did co-precipitate with HDAC1 suggesting a reciprocal relationship between these two proteins. These results suggested that HDAC1 (but not HDAC3) might be involved in the regulation of STAT3. The HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (LBH, Novartis Pharm) was more cytotoxic to ABC (LD50, 10-20nM) than GCB (LD50, 50-100nM) and was shown to dephosphorylate STAT3. These results led to experiments designed to determine the effect of LBH on STAT3 acetylation. When ABC cells were incubated with LBH, co-immunoprecipitation data showed a dose-dependent increased in acetylation of STAT3 without significant change on the levels of STAT3 immunoprecipitated. Next, we asked that how LBH is dephosphorylating STAT3. One potential mechanism is activation of a protein phosphatase. Immunoprecipitation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in the lysates of LBH-treated cells followed by western blotting of STAT3 demonstrated a positive correlation between LBH dose and amount of STAT3 co-immunoprecipitated with PP2A. Our data show that when LBH is incubated with ABC cells, the LBH increases binding of PP2A to STAT3 and the increased phosphatase activity turns off STAT3 signaling. Since both HDAC inhibitor (LBH) and the JAK2 inhibitor (TG) had selective cytotoxic effects on ABC cells, and since both agents dephosphorylate STAT3, we combined the two drugs. We found that the combination exhibited enhanced inhibitory effects on the growth of ABC cells and was able to alter the association of STAT3 with HDAC1 and subsequently dephosphorylate STAT3 to greater extent than either agent alone. Furthermore, we knocked down HDAC1 expression (through siRNA) in OCILy10 (ABC) cells and showed that inhibition of HDAC1 inhibits constitutively activated STAT3. This data suggests that inhibiting HDAC1 expression results in STAT3 dephosphorylation. In summary, we have demonstrated that a key consequence of HDAC expression in ABC cells is continuous activation of STAT3. These data indicate that HDACs activate STAT3 and that PP2A may be important in maintaining STAT3 in the activated state in the ABC cells. This study describes a new mechanism by which STAT3 mediates ABC cell survival and provides the rationale for targeting ABC type DLBCL by simultaneously inhibiting HDAC activity and STAT3 activation by pharmacologic grade inhibitors such as LBH589 and TG101348, which are currently in clinical trial. A phase 1 and 2 trial of JAK2 inhibitor, TG101348 for ABC/GCB type DLBCL is planned. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are key regulatory RNAs that do not code for protein. Recently lncRNAs have been recognized as key regulators of gene expression and chromatin organization. Although, deregulation of lncRNAs such as HOTAIR, MALAT1 and H19 has been reported in solid cancers, role of lncRNAs in lymphoma or other hematologic malignancies is not known. The aim of this study is to identify lymphoma-associated lncRNAs and elucidate their role in disease pathogenesis. Next generation RNA-sequencing and validation studies were carried out on mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patient samples along with normal controls. As a result, hundreds of lncRNAs were found overexpressed in the MCL samples as compared with normal B cells, including RP11-24J23.2 (50 fold), RP11-12A2.3 (36 fold) and DLEU7-AS1 (19 fold). Quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) confirmed higher expression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 in MCL patient samples as compared to normal B cells. To investigate the biological significance of lncRNAs in MCL cells, we overexpressed RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs and analyzed effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis. To achieve overexpression lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 were cloned individually in expression pcDNA3.1 generating constructs: pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1and then transfected into MCL cell lines along with pcDNA3.1. QRT-PCR revealed effective overexpression (~100 fold increase over baseline) for each transfected lncRNAs construct in Granta and Mino cells. Analysis of proliferation and survival showed that overexpressing RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 promotes cell proliferation and survival in these cells as compared to the vector controls. Most of the lncRNAs found so far have been linked to the transcriptional regulation of the target genes through their association with chromatin remodeling factors such as Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). To identify the functional relevance of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs, we examined the binding of the lymphoma specific lncRNAs with PRC2 complex, by performing RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) using specific antibodies to EZH2, EED and SUZ12. The RNA-IP results demonstrate high affinity binding of all three lncRNAs with SUZ12 and EED but a weak binding with EZH2. Furthermore, RNA-IP using antibody to histone 3-lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), a suppressive histone mark associated with PRC2 complex, also showed efficient binding with RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1. These results suggest that RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs can directly associated with PRC2 complex at chromatin. To understand the mechanism of increased cell growth after overexpression of lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1, we analyzed expression level of important genes signature of MCL pathogenesis that include cyclin D1, cyclin D3, c-Myc, P14, and SOX11, a member of the group C SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) transcription factor family. Our results demonstrate that overexpression of lncRNAs RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 enhanced the levels of cyclin D1 (>2 fold) mRNA without any impact on cyclin D3 or c-Myc transcript levels. In contrast overexpression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs decreased SOX11 (0.08, 0.1 and 0.06 respectively) and P14 (0.06, 0.7 and 0.40 respectively) mRNA expression in Mino cells. To gain understanding of the mechanism involved in the suppression of SOX11 by the lncRNAs, we performed Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with EZH2, EED and SUZ12 antibodies on Mino cells transfected with pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1 or vector control. The data showed that overexpression of RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1 significantly increased the binding of EED and to a lesser extent of EZH2 to SOX11 promoter while the binding of SUZ12 to SOX11 promoter was not changed as compared to vector alone. In conclusion, our results imply that lncRNAs are overexpressed in the MCL. Moreover, lymphoma associated lncRNAs (RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1) regulate SOX11 expression via PRC2 complex contributing towards growth of MCL cells. Specific nature of lncRNAs found in lymphoma samples suggests that lncRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 115 Patients with diffuse large B- cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tumors that have an activated B-cell like (ABC) gene expression profile have a poorer prognosis. Understanding the mechanism(s) used by ABC tumor cells to resist the effects of common chemotherapy agents may lead to alternative approaches for the treatment of these tumors. ABC cell lines have been shown to have high levels of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3); however, the mechanisms that regulate STAT3 signaling in ABC DLBCL remain unclear. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are enzymes that can deacetylate both non-histone and histone substrates. In this study we tested the hypothesis that HDACs in the tumor cells target a non-histone protein STAT3 in ABC DLBCL. In studies of HDAC expression in DLBCL tumors, we found over-expression of the type 1 HDACs, specifically HDAC1and HDAC3, in the pSTAT3- positive ABC tumors as compared to germinal centre B like (GCB) tumors. We then performed a co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay to learn the functional interaction between STAT3 and HDAC1. We found that STAT3 formed complexes with HDAC1 or HDAC3. Further Co-IP studies demonstrated that p300, a histone acetyltransferase (HAT), STAT3, and HDAC1 are all in the same complex. To determine whether p300 acetylates STAT3 in ABC cells, we immuno-precipitated endogenous p300 and blotted with acetylated STAT3 and showed that p300 acetylates STAT3 at lysine 685. We next tested whether HDAC inhibition could affect p300 mediated STAT3 acetylation in ABC cells. Inhibition of HDAC activity through the HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (LBH, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) increased STAT3 acetylation in a dose- dependent manner. Similar results were obtained when we used antiacetyl- lysine antibody. Furthermore HDAC1 over-expression inhibits STAT3 acetylation at lysine 685. This data implies a tight regulation of STAT3 acetylation and deacetylases in vivo in ABC lymphoma. In addition to acetylation, STAT3 can be modified by phosphorylation, thus the effect of HDAC inhibition on pSTAT3 both at serine and tyrosine residues was studied. We observed a dose-dependent decrease in pSTAT3 with some inhibitory effect on total STAT3. LBH was found to mediate STAT3 dephosphorylation by inhibiting the tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and TYK2, the STAT3 upstream activators, in a dose- dependent manner. Since ABC lymphoma has higher levels of HDAC1 or HDAC3 and pSTAT3/STAT3 than GCB, we hypothesized that ABC cells will be more sensitive to HDAC inhibition than GCB. In fact, when ABC and GCB DLBCL cells were treated with LBH we observed that LBH was more cytotoxic to ABC than GCB as evidenced by annexin/PI staining and PARP cleavage. LD90 was 25 nM for ABC cells, however GCB cells required 5 times more LBH to kill 90% cells. STAT3 activation regulates genes involved in cell survival, including Bcl-2, Mcl-1, Bcl-XL, and c-Myc. LBH treatment resulted in down-regulation of Mcl-1 and c-Myc in ABC cells but has no effect in GCB cells; however, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL levels were not decreased in both the subtype. Having established that HDAC1 physically associated with STAT3 and that LBH treatment elevated STAT3 acetylation in ABC cells, we proceeded to deplete endogenous HDAC1 with siRNA in Ly3 cells and found that HDAC1 knockdown up-regulated STAT3 acetylation indicating that HDAC1 negatively regulates the acetylation in vivo. HDAC1 inhibition also prevented phopshorylation of STAT3 and induces aopotosis in ABC cells. In summary, we have demonstrated that a key consequence of HATs and HDACs expression and activity is modulation of the STAT3 pathway in ABC lymphoma. Inhibition of this pathway with the HDAC inhibitor LBH inhibits constitutive STAT3 signaling and induces Mcl-1 mediated apoptosis. These studies provide the rationale for targeting the poorly responsive ABC-type DLBCL by inhibiting HDAC activity with epigenetic inhibitors such as LBH. We are currently testing LBH589 in relapsed DLBCL in a phase I clinical trial. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1691 Poster Board I-717 Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell malignancy that is characterized by the production of a monoclonal IgM protein and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in the bone marrow. The aberrant production of the monoclonal IgM can result in serum hyperviscosity that can cause significant morbidity in patients with this disease. In previous work, we have shown that IL-6 significantly upregulates IgM secretion by WM cells and that IL-6 secretion is regulated by CCL5 (Rantes). We have also shown that IL-6 mediated IgM secretion in WM requires phosphorylation of Stat1 and Stat3. Because IL-6 induced signaling involves the Jak/Stat pathway, we tested whether the use of a Jak/Stat inhibitor, TG101348, would result in down regulation of CCL5, IL-6 and IgM production and inhibit cell proliferation and viability in WM. First, we determined whether TG101348 could inhibit the production of CCL5 because other Jak inhibitors have been shown to inhibit cytokine production. Using the BCWM.1 cell line as well CD19+ malignant cells from bone marrow specimens from WM patients, we measured CCL5 by ELISA in the culture supernatant 24 hours after treatment with increasing concentrations of the inhibitor. We found that CCL5 secretion was decreased by 50% at a concentration of TG101348 of 250nM and was completely inhibited at 2μM. Next, we measured IL-6 production after treatment with TG101348. We had previously shown that stromal cells are the primary source of IL-6 and therefore used the stromal cell line HS-5 to measure IL-6 by ELISA after treatment with the inhibitor. Our previous work had also shown that IL-6 secretion was mediated by GLI (a member of the Hedgehog pathway) rather than the Jak/Stat pathway. Interestingly, we found that IL-6 secretion was inhibited in a dose dependent fashion but required higher doses for complete suppression (8μM). We then measured IgM production by malignant B-cells 24 hours after treatment with TG101348. Our previous work had shown that IL-6 mediated IgM secretion was dependent on the Jak/Stat pathway. We found that IgM production was inhibited by 50% at 500nM and completely suppressed at 2μM. Finally, we measured the effect of TG101348 on cell proliferation and survival. Using the BCWM.1 cell line, we found that cell proliferation as determined by tritiated thymidine uptake was inhibited in a dose dependent fashion with 50% inhibition at 1μM. Inhibition of cell viability as measured by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining, however, required higher concentrations and cell viability was inhibited with an IC50 of 8μM. These data confirm the role of Jak/Stat signaling in the CCL5-IL-6-IgM axis in WM. We found that TG101348 generally suppressed the signaling and growth of WM cells but that pathways that were known to be Jak/Stat dependent required significantly lower doses to be completely inhibited. These data provide a strong rationale for the use of inhibitors of this pathway, such as TG101348, in the treatment of patients with WM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.