Back to Authors

Kailas, Sujatha

Mayo Clinic

University of Illinois Chicago

Citations 2

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy
Chen, Yue , Ma, Shaodi , Liu, M. , Yau, Vicky , Kim, Na Hyun , Kailas, Sujatha, Lowe, Scott , Bentley, Rachel , Chen, Shuya , Liu, Jie , Meng, Muzi , Huang, Yuting , Zhou, Qin , Wu, Yuyan , Liu, Mengqing , Huang, Yuting , Sun, Chenyu

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | September 22, 2023 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 332-341

10.1111/jebm.12554 Get It

AbstractBackgroundParticipation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.MethodsThis meta‐analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random‐effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.ResultsSeventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, p < 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02–1.63, p = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08–0.17, p < 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28, p = 0.020, respectively).ConclusionIn addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.
Is metformin use associated with a reduced risk of oesophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen, Yue , Cheng, Xingyu , Sun, Chenyu , Kim, Na Hyun , Kailas, Sujatha, Qureshi, Faisal, Karadsheh, Zeid, Wu, Yile , Hu, Lei , Zhou, Zhen , Bhan, Chandur , Kim, Keun Young , Manem, Raveena, Cheng, Ce , Zhou, Qin , Sun, Chenyu

Postgraduate Medical Journal | September 30, 2021 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 1165 | Pages: 866-870

10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140432 Get It

AbstractObjectivesStudies on the association between metformin use and the risk of oesophageal cancer (OC) have generated controversial findings. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to reassess the effects of metformin on OC.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was conducted to select relevant studies from origination to February 2021. Heterogeneity was evaluated through the Q test and I2 statistics. HRs and 95% CIs were pooled through either random-effect or fixed-effect models. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and publication bias diagnosis were also performed.ResultsSeven studies with 5 426 343 subjects were included. Metformin use was associated with reduced risk of OC (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.87, p&lt;0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were relatively stable.ConclusionMetformin is associated with a reduced risk of OC. More well-designed studies are still needed to further elaborate on these associations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021237127.