Ma, Shaodi

331 Background: The relationship between plant-based dietary patterns and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains unclear. The Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index (hPDI) is a tool that measures adherence to plant-based diet and generates “scores” for clinical comparison. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between hPDI and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancers. Methods: A PubMed search identified relevant studies reporting on the association between hPDI and upper GI cancers. Reference lists were manually searched for additional studies. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines, and quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled risk estimates were calculated using inverse-variance fixed-effects models, with subgroup analyses by cancer type. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using leave-one-out approach and by switching between fixed- and random-effects models. Forest plots and funnel plots were generated with RevMan 5.4, while Begg’s and Egger’s tests for publication bias were performed using Stata 15. Results: A total of four studies were included, all with high NOS scores. Overall, higher hPDI scores were associated with a significantly lower risk of upper GI cancers (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56–0.75). In subgroup analyses, the inverse association was consistent for both esophageal cancer (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54–0.79) and gastric cancer (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50–0.79). Between-study heterogeneity was low (I² = 35%, P = 0.16). Publication bias assessment indicated no evidence of small-study effects, as Begg’s test was non-significant (P = 0.88) and Egger’s test showed no significant bias (P = 0.76). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with consistent results after sequential exclusion of individual studies and when using random-effects models. Conclusions: Higher hPDI scores were associated with a significantly reduced risk of esophageal and gastric cancers, indicating that adherence to a healthy plant-based diet may reduce upper GI cancer risk. These findings highlight the potential role of dietary modification in upper GI cancer prevention.

AbstractBackgroundParticipation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.MethodsThis meta‐analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random‐effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.ResultsSeventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, p < 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02–1.63, p = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08–0.17, p < 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28, p = 0.020, respectively).ConclusionIn addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer globally. Secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRP) are important elements associated with the Wnt signaling pathway, and its dysregulated expression is found in multiple cancers. However, the function of distinct SFRPs in GC remains poorly understood. We investigated the differential expression, prognostic value, and immune cell infiltration of SFRPs in gastric cancer patients from the Oncomine, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), UALCAN, Kaplan–Meier plotter, cBioPortal, STRING, Gene-MANIA, DAVID, MethSurv, and TIMER databases. We found that the expression levels of SFRP2 and SFRP4 were significantly increased in GC tissues, whereas the SFRP1 and SFRP5 expressions were reduced. SFRP1, SFRP2, and SFRP5 were significantly correlated with the clinical cancer stage in GC patients. Higher expression of SFRPs was associated with short overall survival (OS) in GC patients. Besides, high SFRPs methylation showed favorable OS in GC patients. The functions of SFRPs were primarily related to the Wnt signaling pathway, immune system development, and basal cell carcinoma. The expression of SFRPs was strongly correlated with immune infiltrating cells, including CD4+ T cells and macrophages in GC. Our study indicated that SFRPs could be potential targets of precision therapy and prognostic biomarkers for the survival of GC patients.