Pennington, Zach

Introduction For large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic strokes, three major techniques of mechanical thrombectomy have demonstrated efficacy. In this study, we compared stent retrievers (SR),contact aspiration (Asp), and a combined approach to provide an updated comparison of key outcomes for each strategy. Methods We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to September 2024. Studies were included if they included outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever, contact aspiration, or a combination of both techniques. Results Twenty‐four studies comprising a total of 12,845 patients were included in the analysis. Compared to the Asp technique alone, the combined mechanical thrombectomy (MT) approach was associated with a higher risk of arterial dissection (RR: 2.00; 95% CI [1.15, 3.44]), longer procedure duration (MD: 13.35 minutes; 95% CI [5.87, 20.83]) and associated with a lower risk of arterial dissection (RR: 0.50; 95% CI [0.29, 0.87]). However, Asp was associated with a lower rate of first‐pass effect (FPE) compared to combined MT (RR: 0.67; 95% CI [0.46, 0.96]). Additionally, stent retriever (SR) use was linked to a higher procedure duration compared to Asp(MD: 13.39 minutes; 95% CI [5.55, 21.22]) and a lower FPE rate (RR: 0.75; 95% CI [0.59,0.96]). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of successful recanalization, 90‐day functional outcomes, or mortality. Conclusion In our analysis, all three techniques demonstrated similar recanalization rates and functional outcomes. However, aspiration was associated with shorter procedure times and fewer arterialdis section complications, while the combination technique showed a higher first pass effect. Given the comparable overall efficacy, the choice of technique should be guided by the physician's preference, expertise, and confidence, tailored to the individual patient's profile.

OBJECTIVE Isthmic spondylolisthesis impacts up to 11.5% of the general population. For patients who have failed conservative therapy, decompression and fusion or decompression alone are options for surgical management. However, there remains debate as to whether reduction of mobile spondylolisthesis is integral to good patient outcomes. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated with fusion in situ and those undergoing fusion with reduction of isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS The Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases were systematically queried on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies comparing treatment outcomes in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis after in situ fusion or fusion with spondylolisthesis reduction. Endpoints of interest included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, hospitalization duration, operative morbidity, and rates of surgical revision. Data from individual studies were aggregated using random-effects models to assess combined effects. RESULTS Of 277 identified studies, 7 studies were included with an aggregate 308 patients (143 underwent fusion in situ and 165 underwent reduction). Patients who underwent reduction for isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis had significantly lower rates of pseudarthrosis at last follow-up (OR 0.22, p = 0.03). Estimated blood loss, operative time, hospitalization duration, change in ODI score, change in back pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and reoperation rate did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS For patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, the present data suggest that fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis may lower rates of pseudarthrosis as compared to in situ fusion. However, operative morbidity and improvement in patient-reported outcomes were similar between strategies.

OBJECTIVE Hundreds of thousands of Americans undergo decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis annually. The mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression) procedure was developed as a potentially less invasive alternative to open decompression; however, much of the evidence has been gathered from industry-sponsored studies. The present study sought to compare real-world clinical outcomes between the mild procedure and open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS All patients who underwent the mild procedure at a single-institution, multisite, tertiary care center from 2005 to October 2024 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to identify patients who underwent open decompression at the same institution, with age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities as covariates. Primary outcomes were change in pain on the numeric rating scale (NRS), surgical reoperation, and perioperative complications. For pain, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a 30% improvement in NRS score. RESULTS A total of 175 patients who underwent the mild procedure (mean age 76.3 ± 8.7 years; 44.6% female) were matched to 175 patients treated with open decompression (mean age 75.4 ± 8.7 years; 44.0% female). Among patients with at least 60 days of follow-up, those treated with open decompression were more likely to achieve the MCID for pain (43.1% vs 22.2%, p < 0.001). Patients treated with mild were more likely to require reoperation (46.2% vs 29.3%, p = 0.008). Those who underwent the mild procedure experienced lower rates of durotomies (0% vs 2.9%, p = 0.024) but had higher rates of neurological deficits (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS For patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis, those who underwent open decompression were more likely to achieve pain improvement and less likely to require reoperation compared with those who underwent the mild procedure.

OBJECTIVE Lordotic devices have garnered increased attention for improving the segmental lordosis (SL) achieved with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). However, it is unclear the degree to which surgeons maximize the "ideal" or listed lordosis of the interbody device. METHODS Patients undergoing one- or two-level TLIF for degenerative pathologies were identified and data were extracted on demographics, baseline lumbopelvic radiographic parameters, and TLIF details. The primary outcome of interest was the degree to which postoperative SL approximated the listed cage lordosis (Δtarget). Change in SL was a secondary outcome. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to identify significant predictors of the percentage of ideal lordosis achieved. RESULTS A total of 239 treated levels were included (median patient age 66.6 years; 56.9% female); 151 levels were part of single-level TLIF constructs. The median segmental corrections were a 2.8° increase in SL and 2.8 mm in disc height. The median difference between listed cage lordosis and postoperative SL (Δtarget) was 0.5°. However, only 56.1% of levels achieved at least the listed cage lordosis. Linear mixed-effects modeling found that independent predictors of Δtarget were lower implant lordosis (estimate −1.01° [95% CI −1.15° to −0.87°] per degree, p < 0.001), greater preoperative SL (estimate 0.38° [95% CI 0.28°–0.48°] per degree, p < 0.001), greater preoperative PI (estimate 0.06° [95% CI 0.02°–0.11°] per degree, p = 0.007), and closer approximation of the anterior apophyseal ring of the caudal vertebrae (estimate −0.27° [95% CI −0.39° to −0.15°] per mm, p < 0.001). Similarly, independent predictors of postoperative SL were larger implant lordosis (estimate 0.16° [95% CI 0.05°–0.27°] per degree, p = 0.004), lower preoperative SL (estimate −0.70° [95% CI −0.79° to −0.62°] per degree, p < 0.001), greater preoperative PI (estimate 0.08° [95% CI 0.04°–0.12°] per degree, p < 0.001), and closer approximation of the anterior apophyseal ring of the cranial vertebrae (estimate −0.15° [95% CI −0.28° to −0.03°] per mm, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS The present results suggest that while lordosing, only 56% TLIF operations obtain the listed interbody lordosis ("target" lordosis). Anterior placement within the disc space is the only modifiable intraoperative technical factor for maximizing lordosis for a given interbody, highlighting the importance of effective disc space exenteration.

Background For large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic strokes, three major techniques of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have demonstrated efficacy. Here we compare the safety and efficacy of stent retrievers (SR), contact aspiration (Asp), and a combined mechanical thrombectomy (cMT) for LVO ischemic stroke. Methods Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to December 2024 describing patients with ischemic stroke who underwent MT using SR, Asp, or cMT. Results Twnety-four studies comprising a total of 12 845 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with cMT, Asp was associated with a lower rate of first pass effect (FPE) (risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.96), shorter procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −13.35 min; 95% CI −20.83 to –5.87), and lower risk of arterial dissection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87). Additionally, SR use was linked to a higher procedure duration compared with Asp (MD 13.39 min; 95% CI 5.55 to 21.22) and a lower symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of number of passes, successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes, mortality, arterial perforation, or embolization to new territory. Conclusions All three techniques demonstrated similar recanalization rates and functional outcomes. However, Asp was associated with shorter procedure times and fewer arterial dissection complications, while cMT showed a higher FPE. Given the comparable overall efficacy, the choice of technique should be guided by the physician’s preference, expertise, and confidence, tailored to the individual patient’s profile.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether level selection for a three-column osteotomy (3CO) impacts cervical deformity correction outcomes, including neurological, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a cervical or upper thoracic 3CO for cervical deformity correction by the senior author from 2008 to 2024. Collected outcome measures included neurological outcomes, mechanical complication rates, spinopelvic alignment, and patient-reported outcomes. The minimum follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS One hundred fifteen patients were identified who underwent a cervical or upper thoracic 3CO for cervical deformity correction, of whom 77 met inclusion criteria for this study with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The median age was 66 years, the median BMI was 27, and 43% of patients were male. Sixteen patients underwent a 3CO at the C7–T1 levels and 61 patients at T2–6 levels. Patients who underwent C7–T1 3CO were more likely to experience a new postoperative neurological deficit compared with those who underwent T2–6 3CO (56% vs 18%, p = 0.004), had less correction in their T1 slope (6° vs 18°, p = 0.027), had less correction in C2–T4 sagittal vertical axis (2.8 cm vs 4.9 cm, p = 0.043), and had a worse Neck Disability Index (NDI) score at 1 year compared with baseline (an increase of 7 vs a decrease of 12, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS Cervical deformity patients who underwent a 3CO at C7–T1 had a higher rate of postoperative neurological deficits, less radiographic correction, and worse NDI scores at 1 year compared with patients who underwent a 3CO from T2 to T6. Although 3CO level selection is multifactorial and patient specific, surgeons should consider a 3CO level caudal to T1 when feasible.

OBJECTIVE Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) affects 5%–61% of patients following thoracolumbar fusion. Many patients are asymptomatic, but a plurality require surgical revision at a cost of $75,000 per case. This analysis sought to analyze the degree to which bone quality and paraspinal muscle sarcopenia influence PJK failure mode. METHODS Patients undergoing thoracolumbar instrumented fusion with an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) at the thoracolumbar junction (T10–L2) were identified and data were gathered on surgery, bone quality, pre- and postoperative sagittal alignment, and paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). PJK was defined as a ≥ 10° increase in proximal junctional angle from the first postoperative radiograph. PJK was classified as discoligamentous failure (type 1), bone failure (type 2), or screw-bone interface failure (type 3) according to the Yagi-Boachie system. Bone quality was assessed by Hounsfield units (HUs) and the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score at the UIV. RESULTS One hundred fifty patients were identified (median age 67 years, 53.3% female), 46 of whom experienced PJK (22 type 1, 13 type 2, 11 type 3). The median time to onset was most rapid for type 2 events (2.6 months). There were no differences between patients experiencing PJK versus controls regarding bone quality (HUs or VBQ score) or paraspinal muscle CSA on univariate comparison. However, subdivision by PJK type showed patients experiencing bone failure (type 2) PJK had significantly lower HUs at the UIV and UIV+1 relative to those experiencing type 1 PJK or no PJK (all p < 0.05). The VBQ score trended toward being significant, with a higher VBQ score (worse bone quality) in those suffering type 2 PJK, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Patients experiencing discoligamentous failure PJK (type 1) had small multifidus CSA (390 mm 2 ) relative to patients experiencing type 2 (516 mm 2 ) or type 3 (440 mm 2 ) PJK and patients who did not experience PJK (481 mm 2 ), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. On time-to-event analysis, low HUs of the UIV/UIV+1 predicted type 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.93; p = 0.002) and type 2/3 PJK (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.96; p = 0.006) but not type 1 PJK. Low UIV multifidus CSA trended toward being a significant predictor of type 1 PJK (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69–1.05; p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS The combination of underlying bone quality and paraspinal musculature CSA at the UIV appeared to influence failure mode among patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion terminating at the thoracolumbar junction.

With continued improvements in systemic cancer therapies, there has been an increase in the survivorship of patients with spinal metastases. However, many patients with spinal metastases are frail and may not be able to tolerate the morbidity of open surgery. For these patients, percutaneous ablation techniques offer a minimally invasive approach that can facilitate local tumor control and pain relief. Here we describe the currently employed modalities—radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT)—summarize the clinical support for their use, and overview the relative risks and benefits for each. All these technologies offer to help improve local tumor control and improve oncologic pain associated with vertebral metastases, and they have become a staple of multidisciplinary spine metastasis care at many centers. As clinical experience with these technologies continues to grow, their use will likely become more widely adopted, and so understanding of their indications, risks, and benefits will become increasingly important to the practicing spine oncologist.

OBJECTIVE Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by gait deterioration, cognitive disturbances, and urinary incontinence. Gait deficits pose safety hazards due to frequent falls, yet objective investigations of gait improvement following ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess objective improvement in gait parameters for patients with iNPH after VPS placement. METHODS All patients treated with a VPS for iNPH by the senior author at a single tertiary care center from December 2017 to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent detailed motion analysis testing before surgery with > 1 follow-up assessment were included. Analyzed parameters included gait velocity, gait cadence, stride length, stride width, gait stability ratio, total support, and single support. Time-dependent linear mixed-effects models and generalized additive mixed-effects models (GAMMs) were used to model short-term and longitudinal gait parameter changes, respectively. RESULTS A total of 212 patients (137 male, median age was 75.2 years) who underwent VPS placement for iNPH were included, with a total of 747 gait analyses performed at a median last-gait analysis follow-up duration of 12.0 months. Statistically significant changes in all gait parameter values were seen between the preoperative time point and first postoperative follow-up (within 3 months) time point (paired Wilcoxon p < 0.001), with a statistically significant majority of patients experiencing improvement (binominal p < 0.0001). Longitudinal analyses using a GAMM showed increased gait velocity, single support, and stride length, with decreased stability ratio, step width, and total support at early time points, while a plateau was achieved around 6 months. CONCLUSIONS A detailed gait analysis demonstrated significant improvements in objective ambulation metrics, particularly in the gait velocity, stride length, and gait stability ratio, following VPS placement in patients with iNPH. Most patients maintained marked improvement from baseline to the last follow-up assessment, although a plateau of the benefit was experienced over longer follow-up.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for mechanical complications following complex spinal reconstruction for spondylectomy of primary spinal column tumors. METHODS A retrospective chart review identified patients treated with spondylectomy for primary spinal column tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine followed by posterior instrumentation and anterior column reconstruction. Variables collected included basic demographics, smoking status, chronic steroid use, frailty (Charlson Comorbidity Index), extent of resection, Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classification, tumor volume, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, anterior column reconstruction and fixation techniques, rod characteristics, Hounsfield units (HUs), and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were included (14 men, 11 women) with an average (± SD) age of 45 ± 18 years, BMI of 28 ± 5.7, and follow-up of 6.0 ± 6.2 years. Primary spinal column tumor pathology included chordoma (40%), chondrosarcoma (16%), giant cell tumor (16%), osteosarcoma (16%), osteoblastoma (8%), and aneurysmal bone cyst (4%). Six patients (24%) experienced mechanical complications, including rod fractures (n = 5) and distal junctional failure (n = 1). Of the 6 patients with mechanical complications, 4 (67%) underwent reoperation. The length of follow-up was the only statistically significant risk factor for patients with mechanical complications (average 11 years) compared to those without complications (average 4.4 years, p = 0.047). Average HUs were 144 for mechanical complication patients versus 180 for those without (p = 0.08). Anterior column reconstruction materials included a titanium cage (13 patients, 3 failures), structural allograft (6 patients, 2 failures), vascularized fibular strut autograft (6 patients, no failures), nonvascularized structural autograft (5 patients, 1 failure), vascularized rib autograft (5 patients, 2 failures), and a polyetheretherketone cage (2 patients, no failures). The vascularized fibular strut autograft had a 0% mechanical failure rate, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.28). Twelve patients (48%) had anterior fixation placed, with a 17% rate of mechanical complications (p = 0.65). Five patients (20%) had > 2-rod constructs, with a 20% mechanical complication rate (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS Reconstruction following primary spinal column tumor resection is a significant challenge, as evident by a high rate of mechanical complications and instrumentation failure. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes to identify techniques that may mitigate the risk of failure.