Manoukian, Steven V.

Thienopyridine administration has a class Ia recommendation in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite this many physicians withhold this treatment until after angiography because of concerns over the minority of patients who may require coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). We sought to evaluate the one year composite ischemic outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, revascularization) in ACS patients requiring CABG based on thienopyridine exposure and timing of CABG. Methods: In the ACUITY trial, thienopyridine administration and timing was left to investigators’ discretion. In the subset of patients requiring CABG, the one year composite ischemic outcome was compared in those not exposed to thienopyridines (group A), those who received thienopyridine and went to CABG ≤120 hours from the last dose (group B) and those who received thienopyridine and went to CABG >120 hours after the last dose (group C). Major bleeding was defined based on ACUITY definitions. Results: CABG was performed in 1539 (11.1%) patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups. Mean time from angiography to CABG, major bleeding, and 1-year composite ischemia are presented in the table below. Conclusions: Based on our analysis of ACS patients undergoing CABG in the ACUITY trial, those who received thienopyridine preoperatively and went to CABG >120 hours from the last dose had improved one year composite ischemic outcomes compared to those not exposed or those who received thienopyridine and went to CABG ≤120 hours after the last dose.

Background: In the ACUITY Trial, patients (pts) with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) had significantly higher rates of ischemic events and major bleeding compared to pts without CRI at 30 days. Bivalirudin (Biv) monotherapy provided similar protection from ischemic events but with significantly less bleeding compared to heparin + a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (Hep+GPI). The impact of a Biv alone strategy on one year mortality is unknown. Methods: Pts with moderate and high risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were randomized to Hep + GPI, Biv + GPI, or Biv monotherapy. CRI was defined as baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 mL/min. We evaluated the impact of CRI and antithrombotic strategy on composite ischemia (death, MI, or revascularization) and mortality at one year. Results: Of the pts enrolled, 12,933 had baseline CrCl data: 2468 (19.1%) pts had CrCl ≥60 mL/min and 10,465 (80.9%) pts had CrCl <60 mL/min. Rates of major bleeding at 30 days in pts with CRI were significantly lower with Biv alone vs Hep+GPI (6.2% vs 9.8%, p<0.01). Pts with CRI had higher mortality at one year compared to those without CRI (8.7% vs 3.0%, p<0.001). There was no difference in composite ischemia for pts who received Biv monotherapy vs Hep + GPI (23.0% vs 21.4%, p=0.10). One year mortality by antithrombin strategy is shown in the Figure . Conclusions: CRI in pts with ACS is associated with higher rates of one year mortality. In these high risk pts, Biv monotherapy improved early clinical outcomes compared to Hep + GPI by reducing major bleeding, and resulted in similar rates of one year mortality. Cumulative Mortality at One Year, Patients with CRI