Nucifora, Gaetano

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is widely regarded as the gold-standard technique for myocardial tissue characterization, allowing for the detection of structural abnormalities such as myocardial fatty replacement, myocardial edema, myocardial necrosis, and/or fibrosis. Historically, the identification of abnormal myocardial regions relied on variations in tissue signal intensity, often necessitating the use of exogenous contrast agents. However, over the past two decades, innovative parametric mapping techniques have emerged, enabling the direct quantitative assessment of tissue magnetic resonance (MR) properties on a voxel-by-voxel basis. These mapping techniques offer significant advantages by providing comprehensive and precise information that can be translated into color-coded maps, facilitating the identification of subtle or diffuse myocardial abnormalities. As unlikely conventional methods, these techniques do not require a substantial amount of structurally altered tissue to be visually identifiable as an area of abnormal signal intensity, eliminating the reliance on contrast agents. Moreover, these parametric mapping techniques, such as T1, T2, and T2* mapping, have transitioned from being primarily research tools to becoming valuable assets in the clinical diagnosis and risk stratification of various cardiac disorders. In this review, we aim to elucidate the underlying physical principles of CMR parametric mapping, explore its current clinical applications, address potential pitfalls, and outline future directions for research and development in this field.

Aims The outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocarditis and life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias (LT‐VA) are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of recurrent major arrhythmic events (MAEs) after hospital discharge in this patient population. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed 156 patients (median age 44 years; 77% male) discharged with a diagnosis of acute myocarditis and LT‐VA from 16 hospitals worldwide. Diagnosis of myocarditis was based on histology or the combination of increased markers of cardiac injury and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Lake Louise criteria. MAEs were defined as the relapse, after discharge, of sudden cardiac death or successfully defibrillated ventricular fibrillation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) requiring implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy or synchronized external cardioversion. Median follow‐up was 23 months [first to third quartile (Q1–Q3) 7–60]. Fifty‐eight (37.2%) patients experienced MAEs after discharge, at a median of 8 months (Q1–Q3 2.5–24.0 months; 60.3% of MAEs within the first year). At multivariable Cox analysis, variables independently associated with MAEs were presentation with sVT [hazard ratio (HR) 2.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–6.11]; late gadolinium enhancement involving ≥2 myocardial segments (HR 4.51, 95% CI 2.39–8.53), and absence of positive short‐tau inversion recovery (STIR) (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.40–4.79) at first CMR. Conclusions Among patients discharged with a diagnosis of myocarditis and LT‐VA, 37.2% had recurrences of MAEs during follow‐up. Initial CMR pattern and sVT at presentation stratify the risk of arrhythmia recurrence.