Sala, Simone

Over recent years, preclinical and clinical evidence has implicated myocardial inflammation (M-Infl) in the pathophysiology and phenotypes of traditionally genetic cardiomyopathies. M-Infl resembling myocarditis on imaging and histology occurs frequently as a clinical manifestation of classically genetic cardiac diseases, including dilated and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The emerging role of M-Infl in disease pathophysiology is leading to the identification of druggable targets for molecular treatment of the inflammatory process and a new paradigm in the field of cardiomyopathies. Cardiomyopathies constitute a leading cause of heart failure and arrhythmic sudden death in the young population. The aim of this review is to present, from bedside to bench, the current state of the art about the genetic basis of M-Infl in nonischemic cardiomyopathies of the dilated and arrhythmogenic spectrum in order to prompt future research towards the identification of novel mechanisms and treatment targets, with the ultimate goal of lowering disease morbidity and mortality.

Aims The outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocarditis and life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias (LT‐VA) are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of recurrent major arrhythmic events (MAEs) after hospital discharge in this patient population. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed 156 patients (median age 44 years; 77% male) discharged with a diagnosis of acute myocarditis and LT‐VA from 16 hospitals worldwide. Diagnosis of myocarditis was based on histology or the combination of increased markers of cardiac injury and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Lake Louise criteria. MAEs were defined as the relapse, after discharge, of sudden cardiac death or successfully defibrillated ventricular fibrillation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) requiring implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy or synchronized external cardioversion. Median follow‐up was 23 months [first to third quartile (Q1–Q3) 7–60]. Fifty‐eight (37.2%) patients experienced MAEs after discharge, at a median of 8 months (Q1–Q3 2.5–24.0 months; 60.3% of MAEs within the first year). At multivariable Cox analysis, variables independently associated with MAEs were presentation with sVT [hazard ratio (HR) 2.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–6.11]; late gadolinium enhancement involving ≥2 myocardial segments (HR 4.51, 95% CI 2.39–8.53), and absence of positive short‐tau inversion recovery (STIR) (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.40–4.79) at first CMR. Conclusions Among patients discharged with a diagnosis of myocarditis and LT‐VA, 37.2% had recurrences of MAEs during follow‐up. Initial CMR pattern and sVT at presentation stratify the risk of arrhythmia recurrence.