Adhikari, Ramesh

Objective To provide insights into the nature, risk factors, impact and existing measures for reporting and preventing violence in the healthcare system. The under-reporting of violence against healthcare workers (HCWs) globally highlights the need for increased public awareness and education. Methods The Violence Study of Healthcare Workers and Systems study used a survey questionnaire created using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) forms and distributed from 6 June to 9 August 2022. Logistic regression analysis evaluated violence predictors, including gender, age, years of experience, institution type, respondent profession and night shift frequency. A χ 2 test was performed to determine the association between gender and different violence forms. Results A total of 5405 responses from 79 countries were analysed. India, the USA and Venezuela were the top three contributors. Female respondents comprised 53%. The majority (45%) fell within the 26–35 age group. Medical students (21%), consultants (20%), residents/fellows (15%) and nurses (10%) constituted highest responders. Nearly 55% HCWs reported firsthand violence experience, and 16% reported violence against their colleagues. Perpetrators were identified as patients or family members in over 50% of cases, while supervisor-incited violence accounted for 16%. Around 80% stated that violence incidence either remained constant or increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among HCWs who experienced violence, 55% felt less motivated or more dissatisfied with their jobs afterward, and 25% expressed willingness to quit. Univariate analysis revealed that HCWs aged 26–65 years, nurses, physicians, ancillary staff, those working in public settings, with >1 year of experience, and frequent night shift workers were at significantly higher risk of experiencing violence. These results remained significant in multivariate analysis, except for the 55–65 age group, which lost statistical significance. Conclusion This global cross-sectional study highlights that a majority of HCWs have experienced violence, and the incidence either increased or remained the same during the COVID-19 pandemic. This has resulted in decreased job satisfaction.

Abstract Background Although visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in various parts of India, management is still a challenge due to multiple drug resistance. Here we describe a case of a 50 years old female who was diagnosed with visceral leishmaniasis at a tertiary care hospital in northern parts of India and was managed with a repeated trial of liposomal Amphotericin B. Methods Case Discussion: The patient presented in the outpatient department with recurrent fever, mild intermittent abdominal discomfort associated with generalized weakness for the past one month. On per abdomen examination the patient had splenomegaly with spleen palpable 8 cm below the left costal margin. Blood investigations were suggestive of pancytopenia (leukocyte of 1800/cumm, Hemoglobin 7 g/dl, Platelet count: 80,000/cumm) along with severe neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count: 400/cumm) . The CT abdomen showed massive splenomegaly (23 cm) with mild hepatomegaly . Leishmania Immunoglobulin G was positive. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hyperproliferative marrow with plasmacytosis (12-15%). Bone marrow Leishman-Donovan bodies were negative. Serum immunofixation was negative for M spike and serum light chain assay was also negative. She was managed with liposomal Amphotericin B (3mg/kg) for 7 days and was subsequently discharged. After 3 months, the patient again presented with continuous fever, lethargy, running nose, palpitations. Her blood work-up revealed severe pancytopenia again. She was tested for Leishmania anti- rk39 antibody, which was positive. She was given a repeat trial of Liposomal Amphotericin B with a different regimen-3 mg/kg dose on Day 1 to 5, followed by 6th dose on Day 14, followed by 7th dose on Day 21, as per the FDA approved regimen. Patient recovered well. The most recent total leukocyte counts eventually improved to 4800 with normal differential count. Platelets increased to 180,000, Hemoglobin was around 10.8g/dl and spleen was non palpable on physical examination. Results Treatment of leishmania can become complicated due to resistance to various drugs especially when a single agent is being given. Conclusion But in resource limited countries different regimens of liposomal amphotericin B can be tried which might be helpful due to speedy clinical recovery and cost effectiveness. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome is a life-threatening condition associated with elevated inflammatory markers and multiple organ injury. A diagnosis of exclusion, it has been reported after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (SARS-CoV-2) in children and adults; recently it has been described in some post-COVID-19 vaccinated individuals. The prognosis with supportive care and immunomodulatory therapy is good, although some individuals may require treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU). Here we report a case of a 58-year-old man who developed multi-organ failure after receiving the second dose of the Moderna mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. He required critical organ support in the ICU. An extensive workup was done to rule out alternative infectious and inflammatory processes. Following a period of gradual in-hospital convalescence, our patient made a full recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensively described case of multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with Moderna mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine in an adult over 50 years of age.

Real-time RT-PCR is considered the gold standard confirmatory test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, many scientists disagree, and it is essential to understand that several factors and variables can cause a false-negative test. In this context, cycle threshold (Ct) values are being utilized to diagnose or predict SARS-CoV-2 infection. This practice has a significant clinical utility as Ct values can be correlated with the viral load. In addition, Ct values have a strong correlation with multiple haematological and biochemical markers. However, it is essential to consider that Ct values might be affected by pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytical variables such as collection technique, specimen type, sampling time, viral kinetics, transport and storage conditions, nucleic acid extraction, viral RNA load, primer designing, real-time PCR efficiency, and Ct value determination method. Therefore, understanding the interpretation of Ct values and other influential factors could play a crucial role in interpreting viral load and disease severity. In several clinical studies consisting of small or large sample sizes, several discrepancies exist regarding a significant positive correlation between the Ct value and disease severity in COVID-19. In this context, a revised review of the literature has been conducted to fill the knowledge gaps regarding the correlations between Ct values and severity/fatality rates of patients with COVID-19. Various databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched up to April 2021 by using keywords including “RT-PCR or viral load”, “SARS-CoV-2 and RT-PCR”, “Ct value and viral load”, “Ct value or COVID-19”. Research articles were extracted and selected independently by the authors and included in the present review based on their relevance to the study. The current narrative review explores the correlation of Ct values with mortality, disease progression, severity, and infectivity. We also discuss the factors that can affect these values, such as collection technique, type of swab, sampling method, etc.