Purpose The purposes of this study was to better understand the utilization of anterior acromioplasty over time, in the absence of rotator cuff repair; to examine the relation to patient characteristics (age, sex) and types of rotator cuff pathology (inflammation or fibrosis, partial‐thickness tearing, full‐thickness tearing undergoing debridement); and to assess the utilization of arthroscopy in this procedure. Methods Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, cataloging medical records of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, we identified 246 patients who underwent anterior acromioplasty between 1980 and 2005. It has previously been shown that rarely does a resident of Olmsted County undergo an orthopaedic procedure at a facility outside the county. Results The incidence of anterior acromioplasty increased over time ( P < .001), with crude rates of 3.3 per 100,000 persons in 1980 to 1985 and 19.0 per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 2005. Sex, age, and types of rotator cuff pathology did not significantly change over the 26‐year period. There was a dramatic shift from use of the open approach to the arthroscopic approach over this time period ( P < .001) and a decrease in the concomitant performance of distal clavicle resection ( P < .001). Conclusions The frequency of anterior acromioplasty has dramatically increased over time. Increasing knowledge about this syndrome, including better imaging, has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology (inflammation or fibrosis, partial‐thickness tearing, full‐thickness tearing undergoing debridement), as has the application of endoscopic surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, epidemiologic study.
Revision of the humeral component for aseptic loosening in arthroplasty of the shoulder
Between 1976 and 2004, 38 revision arthroplasties (35 patients) were performed for aseptic loosening of the humeral component. The mean interval from primary arthroplasty to revision was 7.1 years (0.4 to 16.6). A total of 35 shoulders (32 patients) were available for review at a mean follow-up of seven years (2 to 19.3). Pre-operatively, 34 patients (97%) had moderate or severe pain; at final follow-up, 29 (83%) had no or only mild pain (p < 0.0001). The mean active abduction improved from 88° to 107° (p < 0.01); and the mean external rotation from 37° to 46° (p = 0.27). Excellent or satisfactory results were achieved in 25 patients (71%) according to the modified Neer rating system. Humeral components were cemented in 29, with ingrowth implants used in nine cases. There were 19 of standard length and 17 were longer (two were custom replacements and are not included). Bone grafting was required for defects in 11 humeri. Only two glenoid components were left unrevised. Intra-operative complications included cement extrusion in eight cases, fracture of the shaft of the humerus is two and of the tuberosity in four. There were four re-operations, one for recurrent humeral loosening, with 89% survival free of re-operations at ten years. Revision surgery for aseptic loosening of the humeral component provides reliable pain relief and modest improvement of movement, although there is a substantial risk of intra-operative complications. Revision to a total shoulder replacement gives better results than to a hemiarthroplasty.
Immediate Active Range of Motion after Modified 2-Incision Repair in Acute Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
Background Different rehabilitation protocols have been used after repair of distal biceps ruptures. Purpose This study investigates the safety of immediate active range of motion protocol after modified 2-incision distal biceps tendon repair in acute ruptures. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Materials and Methods Twenty-one patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were participants in this study. After repair, the upper extremities were placed in a sling for 1 to 2 days and then immediate active range of motion was started. For the first 6 weeks, the elbow was allowed activities of daily living as tolerated by the patient with a 1-lb weight-lifting restriction. Elbow range of motion, isometric and dynamic flexion, and supination strengths were recorded and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were obtained. Results Mean follow-up extension was 0° and mean follow-up flexion was 141° on the operated side, with supination of 74° and pronation of 75°. The mean DASH score for 21 patients was 3.6 ± 3.6 (range, 0-11.4). The mean follow-up isometric flexion strength was found to be 5% (P = .411), and the power (dynamic strength) of flexion was 12% greater on the operated side (P = .046). However, follow-up isometric supination strength was 9% less on the involved side than on the noninvolved side (P = .030), and the power of supination was 11% less on the operated side (P = .007). There were no tendon reruptures at follow-up, determined by physical examination. Conclusion A modified 2-incision distal biceps repair allows a safe immediate active range of motion protocol with early return of nearly full range of motion and strength, without any clinically significant disability.