Abusaleh, Rami

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) pulmonary vein isolation ablation has been utilized increasingly yet variably in the USA. Purpose To identify variations in AF ablation utilization and reimbursement among Medicare beneficiaries (MB). Methodology We used a 100% sample of MB who underwent AF ablation from 2013 to 2019. We stratified data geographically (Northeast, South, West, and Midwest), identified the mean AF prevalence and the number of AF ablations per 100,000 MB, and examined the correlation between AF prevalence and ablation. We also examined the number of cardiologists performing AF ablation per 100,000 MB and the average number of AF ablation per individual cardiologist (ablation/cardiologist), as well as average submitted charge (ASC) for AF ablation. Additionally, we stratified data per urban versus rural areas as well as the gender of performing cardiologists and examined ablation/cardiologist and the ASC. Results Geographic analysis: The mean AF prevalence, the rates AF ablation per 100,000 MB, the number of cardiologists per 100,000 MB, and ablation/cardiologist have shown a steady increase in all regions across years. In all years, the mean AF prevalence was significantly different among regions with the highest prevalence in the Northeast and the lowest in the West (all P<0.001), however, there was no significant difference in the rates of AF ablation per 100,000 MB (all P≥0.056). There was significant correlation between AF prevalence and ablation only in the Midwest and the West, with 46.4% and 43.4% positive correlation respectively (P≤0.0001). The number of cardiologists performing AF ablation per 100,000 MB was not significantly different among regions in all years (All P≥0.48), however, ablation/cardiologist was significantly higher in the West and the South compared to the Northeast and the Midwest (All P<0.0001). On the contrary, the ASC has shown steady decrease in all regions. The ASC was significantly different among regions in all year (all P≤0.003) with higher ASC in the Midwest and the Northeast compared to the south and the West. Urban vs rural analysis: Ablation/cardiologist was not significantly different between urban and rural areas in all years (all P≥0.068) except in 2013 when it was significantly higher in urban areas (P=0.004). The ASC was significantly higher in rural areas only in 2015 and 2019 (P=0.037 and P=0.029 respectively) however, there was no significant difference in the rest of the years (P≥0.07). Gender analysis: Ablation/cardiologist was not significantly different between male and female cardiologists in all years (P≥0.056) except in 2017 when the average was significantly higher per male cardiologists (P=0.007). The ASC was not significantly different in all years (P≥0.362). Conclusion There are variations in AF ablation utilization and reimbursement among MB in the USA according to geographic, urban and rural regions, and the gender of performing cardiologists. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background and study aims Obtaining quality tissue during ERCP biliary stricture sampling is of paramount importance for a timely diagnosis. While single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-guided biopsies have been suggested to be the superior biliary tissue acquisition modality given direct tissue visualization, less is known about the specimen histological quality. We aimed to analyze the specimen quality of SOC biopsies and compare the new generation forceps with prior “legacy” forceps. Patients and methods Patients who underwent SOC from January 2017-August 2021 for biliary sampling were reviewed. In February 2020, the SOC-guided biopsy forceps were changed from legacy SpyBite to the SpyBite Max forceps (max). Specimens were assessed by blinded pathologists for crush artifact (none, mild, or severe) and gross size (greatest dimension in mm). Crush artifact and gross size were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic performance characteristics for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), were assessed in an exploratory fashion. Results Eighty-one patients (max = 27, legacy = 54) with similar baseline characteristics were included in this study. On blinded pathological assessment, 58 % had crush artifact, without significant differences between the two groups (Max 63 % vs. Legacy 56 %; P = 0.64). A similar mean specimen size was found (max 3 mm vs. legacy 3.2 mm; P = 0.24). The overall prevalence of CCA was 40 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the entire cohort using a combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and SOC-guided biopsies were 78.1 %, 91.8 %, 86.2 %, and 86.5 %, respectively. No difference between legacy or max groups was found. Conclusions A high rate of crush artifact was found in SOC-guided biopsy specimens. Further investigation regarding proper biopsy technique and handling is necessary to increase the diagnostic yield with SOC-guided biopsies.

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is an endoscopic procedure for treating gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Limited data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of EUS-GJ in patients with malignant GOO with ascites. Thus, we aimed to study the outcomes and safety of EUS-GJ in GOO patients with vs. without ascites. Patients and methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with malignant GOO who underwent successful EUS-GJ at a tertiary care academic center. Primary outcomes included the efficacy and safety of EUS-GJ. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reintervention, and survival utilizing Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results A total of 55 patients (mean age of 67.0 ± 11.3 years, 40.0 % female) who underwent EUS-GJ, of whom 24 had ascites (small in 22, large in 2) were included. Clinical success was achieved in 91.7 % and 93.5 % (P = 1.00) of patients with and without ascites, respectively. A higher rate of adverse events (AEs) was noted in patients with ascites but this was not statistically significant (37.5 % vs. 19.4 %, P = 0.13). Four patients in the ascites group (16.6 %) developed clinical evidence of peritonitis or sepsis post-EUS-GJ. Eight patients with ascites developed worsening ascites within a month of EUS-GJ. In contrast, only one patient without ascites developed evidence of new ascites. The median survival of patients was not significantly different between the two groups (patients with ascites: 129 days vs. patients without ascites: 180 days, (P = 0.12). Conclusions The efficacy EUS-GJ in the presence of ascites is promising; however, the safety profile remains concerning given the high rate of AEs, specifically peritonitis and sepsis.