Hill, Deirdre A.

Abstract Introduction: Although Hispanic White (HW) females have a lower incidence of breast cancer than non-Hispanic White (NHW) females, breast cancer risk is unclear for HW females after benign breast disease (BBD). Methods: We compared BBD characteristics and subsequent breast cancer risk among HW and NHW females in New Mexico using a population-based collection of benign breast biopsies (1996–2007). BBD was categorized as nonproliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). Breast cancer risk was assessed as absolute risk (AR) using cumulative incidence and RR by comparing the number of breast cancer events in BBDs to non-BBD. Results: This study included 3,684 HW and 6,587 NHW females with BBD. HW females had similar proportions of NPD (58.6% vs. 54.3%), PDWA (21.4% vs. 23.5%), and AH (3.6% vs. 3.3%) as NHW females. Breast cancer risk among all females with BBD was higher than population-based expected rates (RR, 1.87) and was similar for HW and NHW subgroups (RR = 1.99 vs. 1.84). As expected, breast cancer risk increased with increasing BBD severity, both overall [RR, 1.81 (NPD), 1.85 (PDWA), and 3.10 (AH)] and in the HW and NHW subgroups. Adjusted AR of breast cancer at 5 years also increased with the severity of BBD (HW vs. NHW; NPD: 1.4% vs. 2.1%; PDWA: 1.5% vs. 2.7%; AH: 6% vs. 4.8%). Conclusions: We found similar breast cancer RRs and ARs in HW and NHW. Risk counseling should ensure that HW females receive breast cancer clinical management warranted by their similar absolute risks. Impact: The present population-based provides evidence for the clinical management of HW females with BBD for the prevention of breast cancer.

Abstract Introduction: Benign breast disease (BBD) is an important breast cancer (BC) risk factor, which may be classified as non-proliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH) for risk stratification. Data related to the frequency of specific types of BBD and their relationship to BC risk in the Hispanic American population are limited. To address this knowledge gap, we compared BBD and associated BC risk among Hispanic white (HW) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) in New Mexico (NM). Methodology: A retrospective IRB-approved study was performed of women 19 years or older residing in six counties in NM (Bernalillo, Sandoval, Sante Fe, Socorro, Torrance, Cibola/Valencia) between 1996 and mid-2007 to compare the frequency of BBD subtypes and BC risk among HW and NHW. We excluded women who had a history of BC prior to BBD diagnosis or who were diagnosed with BC within 6 months after BBD biopsy. Race and ethnicity were self-reported by women at the time of biopsy. BBD was categorized as NPD, PDWA, or AH based on medical records. Incident BC (in-situ or invasive) was ascertained via linkage to the NM Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) Registry and BC risk was assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), comparing the observed number of BC events to that expected based on the NM SEER six-county race- and ethnicity-specific incidence rates, accounting for age and calendar period. Results: Our analysis included 3,870 HW and 6,996 NHW women with BBD. The HW were younger (47.1 vs. 51 years) compared to NHW. HW women had slightly more NPD (69.4% vs. 66.6%) but less PDWA (26.2% vs. 29.4%) and similar frequency of AH (4.3% vs. 3.9%) as compared to NHW. Over a median post-BBD follow-up period of 13 years (range 6 months-17 years), 644 BCs were observed (4.81% in HW and 6.55% in NHW). The observed BC risk among women with BBD was higher than population-based expected rates (SIR 1.98, 95% CI 1.82-2.13, p<0.001) and showed expected increases in risk with increasing degrees of BBD abnormality: SIR=1.90 for NPD, 2.00 for PDWA, and 3.01 for AH. Comparing BC risk by ethnic subgroups, HW women had an overall risk of BC after BBD that was statistically indistinguishable from NHW women (SIR=2.17, 95% CI 1.86-2.48 in HW women, and SIR=1.91, 95% CI 1.73-2.08 in NHW women). Within the major subgroups of the BBD findings, there were no significant differences in risk of BC after BBD for HW versus NHW women. Conclusions: In this population-based study, benign breast disease subtypes and their associated breast cancer risk were similar among the Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Citation Format: Kush Raj Lohani, Andrea M. Nibbe, Robert A. Vierkant, Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Lisa R. Seymour, Celine M. Vachon, Mark E. Sherman, Amy C. Degnim, Deirdre Hill. Comparison of benign breast disease subtypes and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4213.

Abstract Background: Individuals with a strong family history of colorectal cancer have significant risk for colorectal cancer, although adherence to colonoscopy screening in these groups remains low. This study assessed whether a tailored telephone counseling intervention can increase adherence to colonoscopy in members of high-risk families in a randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Eligible participants were recruited from two national cancer registries if they had a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer under age 60 or multiple affected family members, which included families that met the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), and if they were due for colonoscopy within 24 months. Participants were randomized to receive a tailored telephone intervention grounded in behavioral theory or a mailed packet with general information about screening. Colonoscopy status was assessed through follow-up surveys and endoscopy reports. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess intervention effect. Results: Of the 632 participants (ages 25–80), 60% were female, the majority were White, non-Hispanic, educated, and had health insurance. Colonoscopy adherence increased 11 percentage points in the tailored telephone intervention group, compared with no significant change in the mailed group. The telephone intervention was associated with a 32% increase in screening adherence compared with the mailed intervention (HR, 1.32; P = 0.01). Conclusions: A tailored telephone intervention can effectively increase colonoscopy adherence in high-risk persons. This intervention has the potential for broad dissemination to healthcare organizations or other high-risk populations. Impact: Increasing adherence to colonoscopy among persons with increased colorectal cancer risk could effectively reduce incidence and mortality from this disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(4); 601–10. ©2014 AACR.

AbstractUnderstanding patterns of etiologic commonality and heterogeneity for non-Hodgkin lymphomas may illuminate lymphomagenesis. We present the first systematic comparison of risks by lymphoma subtype for a broad range of putative risk factors in a population-based case-control study, including diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL; N = 416), follicular (N = 318), and marginal zone lymphomas (N = 106), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL; N = 133). We required at least 2 of 3 analyses to support differences in risk: (1) polytomous logistic regression, (2) homogeneity tests, or (3) dichotomous logistic regression, analyzing all 7 possible pairwise comparisons among the subtypes, corresponding to various groupings by clinical behavior, genetic features, and differentiation. Late birth order and high body mass index (≥ 35) kg/m2) increased risk for DLBCL alone. Autoimmune conditions increased risk for marginal zone lymphoma alone. The tumor necrosis factor G-308A polymorphism (rs1800629) increased risks for both DLBCL and marginal zone lymphoma. Exposure to certain dietary heterocyclic amines from meat consumption increased risk for CLL/SLL alone. We observed no significant risk factors for follicular lymphoma alone. These data clearly support both etiologic commonality and heterogeneity for lymphoma subtypes, suggesting that immune dysfunction is of greater etiologic importance for DLBCL and marginal zone lymphoma than for CLL/SLL and follicular lymphoma.