Pery, Ron

Background: The value of platelet characteristics as a prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Methods: We assessed the prognostic ability of post-splenectomy thrombocytosis in patients who underwent left pancreatectomy for PDAC. Perioperative platelet count ratio (PPR), defined as the ratio between the maximum platelet count during the first five days following surgery and the preoperative level, was assessed in relation to long-term outcomes in patients who underwent left pancreatectomy for PDAC between November 2008 and October 2022. Results: A comparative cohort of 245 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC was also evaluated. The median PPR among 106 patients who underwent left pancreatectomy was 1.4 (IQR1.1, 1.8). Forty-six had a PPR ≥ 1.5 (median 1.9, IQR1.7, 2.4) and 60 had a PPR < 1.5 (median 1.2, IQR1.0, 1.3). Patients with a PPR ≥ 1.5 had increased median overall survival (OS) compared to patients with a PPR < 1.5 (40 months vs. 20 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, PPR < 1.5 remained a strong predictor of worse OS (HR 2.24, p = 0.008). Among patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, the median PPR was 1.1 (IQR1.0, 1.3), which was significantly lower compared to patients who underwent left pancreatectomy (p > 0.001) and did not predict OS. Conclusion: PPR is a biomarker for OS after left pancreatectomy for PDAC. Further studies are warranted to consolidate these findings.

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThere is limited research on management of metastatic anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to the liver. This study aimed to describe outcomes for patients undergoing liver resection of anal SCC metastases.MethodsA multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted by three tertiary‐referral centers. Patients undergoing liver surgery between 2008 and 2022 were included. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of recurrence and survival and Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year survival.ResultsTwenty‐one patients underwent liver resection and/or ablation. None were HIV positive and 24% had known HPV infection. 20/21(95%) patients had undergone Nigro protocol for management of the primary tumor with 12/21 (57%) patients experiencing complete response. 4/21 (19%) patients had synchronous liver metastases at time of diagnosis. Median tumor size was 5.0 cm and median tumor number was one. At analysis, 52% remained alive. Median overall survival was 32.2 months. 5‐year overall survival was 50%. Median recurrence‐free survival was 7.7 months and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival was 30%. Need for salvage abdominoperineal resection was negatively associated with recurrence‐free survival. The most common site of recurrence was the liver.ConclusionsLiver resection for metastatic anal SCC can be beneficial for appropriately selected patients.

Introduction: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is gaining popularity. This case series describes our initial institutional experience. Methods: A retrospective study of synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer (March 2020 to December 2021). Results: Eight patients underwent synchronous robotic resections. The median age was 59 (45–72), and the median body mass index was 29 (20–33). Seven received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and five rectal cancers received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. One patient had a low anterior resection with major hepatectomy, two had low anterior resection with minor hepatectomy, and one had abdominoperineal resection with major hepatectomy. One patient had a left colectomy with minor hepatectomy, and two had right colectomies with minor hepatectomy. We used five robotic 8/12 mm ports in all cases. Extraction incisions were Pfannenstiel in four patients, colostomy site in two patients, one perineal incision, and one supra-umbilical incision. The median estimated blood loss was 200 mL (25–500), and the median operative time was 448 min (374–576). There were no intra-operative complications or conversions. Five patients had the liver resection first, and two of six anastomoses were performed before the liver resection. The Median length of stay was 4 days (3–14). There were two post-operative complications, prolonged ileus and DVT, with a Clavien-Dindo complication grade of I and II, respectively. There were no readmissions or reoperations. All colorectal and liver resection margins were negative. Conclusions: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection can be performed effectively utilizing one port configuration with acceptable short-term outcomes and quality of oncologic resection.

Objective: To detail the implementation of a dedicated liver surgery program at a university-affiliated hospital and to analyze its impact on the community, workforce, workload, complexity of cases, the short-term outcomes, and residents and young faculties progression toward technical autonomy and academic production. Background: Due to the increased burden of liver tumors worldwide, there is an increased need for liver centers to better serve the community and facilitate the education of trainees in this field. Methods: The implementation of the program is described. The 3 domains of workload, research, and teaching were compared between 2-year periods before and after the implementation of the new program. The severity of disease, complexity of procedures, and subsequent morbidity and mortality were compared. Results: Compared with the 2-year period before the implementation of the new program, the number of liver resections increased by 36% within 2 years. The number of highly complex resections, the number of liver resections performed by residents and young faculties, and the number of publications increased 5.5-, 40-, and 6-fold, respectively. This was achieved by operating on more severe patients and performing more complex procedures, at the cost of a significant increase in morbidity but not mortality. Nevertheless, operations during the second period did not emerge as an independent predictor of severe morbidity. Conclusions: A new liver surgery program can fill the gap between the demand for and supply of liver surgeries, benefiting the community and the development of the next generation of liver surgeons.