Nguyen, Kianna M.

Background: Telomeres are repetitive sequences at the end of linear chromosomes that preserve genetic information. Patients with telomere biology disorders (TBDs) are subject to multiorgan manifestations, which include the liver. However, due to the rare nature of the disorder, these manifestations are not fully characterized. Methods: Here, we describe the hepatic manifestations of patients with TBD at a large tertiary center within a specialized TBD clinic; 121 consecutive patients with TBD seen from 2017 to 2024 were included. The median age of the TBD diagnosis was 43 years old, with 60% male. The most common pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was TERT (25%), followed by RTEL1 (10%) and TERC (7%). Results: Evidence of hepatic involvement in TBD was observed in 60% of patients (73 of 121), as determined by imaging studies or abnormal liver chemistries. Hepatic steatosis was the most prevalent imaging finding (56%), while a cholestatic pattern of liver injury was the predominant laboratory abnormality (73%). Biopsy-proven portosinusoidal vascular disorder was present in 4 patients. Findings of portal hypertension were observed in 25 patients (34%), with decompensation observed in 12 patients (16%). Traditional liver imaging modalities (computer tomography, ultrasound, and MRI) were compared with magnetic resonance elastography in 41 patients. Of these, 7 patients had abnormal magnetic resonance elastography with normal traditional imaging (17%), indicating higher sensitivity of magnetic resonance elastography to detect liver involvement. Conclusions: This study describes the liver manifestations within a cohort of patients with TBD with findings of portosinusoidal vascular disorder and hepatopulmonary syndrome similar to other cohorts and a noted higher prevalence of hepatic steatosis as compared with the general population. Liver stiffness measurements, integrated with imaging and laboratory testing, further improve characterization of hepatic manifestations in TBD.

ABSTRACT Encapsulation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) has high relevance for biomedical applications ranging from tissue engineering to drug screening and cellular therapies. Microcapsules serve a multitude of purposes—from promoting hPSC organization into spheroids to enabling scalable differentiation in vitro and providing immunoisolation in vivo. While multiple encapsulation strategies have been reported, there is typically a tradeoff between the structural complexity of capsules and throughput of their generation. Our paper describes a novel 3D printed microfluidic encapsulation device for fabricating structurally complex microcapsules with a hydrogel shell and aqueous core at rates of up to 1825 Hz. The use of 3D printing allowed to dramatically decrease device footprint when compared to standard soft lithography‐based microfluidic encapsulation devices. Leveraging decreased footprint and the ability to arrange fluidic networks in a 3D space, we fabricated a 10‐nozzle microencapsulation device that generated microcapsules at a rate 10‐times that of the single‐nozzle device. The novel microfluidic device was used to encapsulate hPSCs, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Hydrogel microcapsules with aqueous core promoted hPSCs aggregation into spheroids or embryoid bodies, which maintained high levels of pluripotency. Our technology enables safe and effective encapsulation of hPSCs on a scale (billions of cells) required to treat patients.

This review describes approaches for encapsulation of pluripotent stem cells, the biomaterials used, strategies for differentiation into hepatocytes and β cells, and the impact of microencapsulation on cellular therapy.

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are capable of unlimited proliferation and can undergo differentiation to give rise to cells and tissues of the three primary germ layers. While directing lineage selection of hPSCs has been an active area of research, improving the efficiency of differentiation remains an important objective. In this study, we describe a two-compartment microfluidic device for co-cultivation of adult human hepatocytes and stem cells. Both cell types were cultured in a 3D or spheroid format. Adult hepatocytes remained highly functional in the microfluidic device over the course of 4 weeks and served as a source of instructive paracrine cues to drive hepatic differentiation of stem cells cultured in the neighboring compartment. The differentiation of stem cells was more pronounced in microfluidic co-cultures compared to a standard hepatic differentiation protocol. In addition to improving stem cell differentiation outcomes, the microfluidic co-culture system described here may be used for parsing signals and mechanisms controlling hepatic cell fate.

Abstract Background: Concern exists that the clinical trial populations differ from respective cancer populations in terms of their age distribution affecting the generalizability of the results, especially the underrepresented minorities. We hypothesized that the clinical trials that do not report race are likely to suffer from a higher degree of age disparity as well and the issue should be addressed in conjunction with each other. Methods: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals from 7/2007-6/2019 were reviewed to identify oncology approvals, and trials with age details were selected. The primary outcome was the weighted mean difference in age between the clinical trial population and realworld population for various cancers. The secondary outcomes were the prevalence of race reporting and association of age and race reporting with each other. Group comparisons for proportions were performed using the χ2 test while continuous variables were compared using multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) test or students t-test as appropriate. P values < .05 were considered significant. Results: Of the 261 trials, the race was reported in 223 (85.4%) of the trials while 38 trials (14.6%) had no mention of race. Race reporting improved minimally over time – 29 (85.3%) in 2007-2010 vs. 49 (80.3%) in 2011-2014 vs. 145 (85.4%) during 2015-2019 (p-value=0.41). No significant association between type of cancer and race reporting was noted – 147 (86.5%) of solid cancer trials vs. 76 (83.5%) of hematological cancer trials reported race (p-value=0.52). Age discrepancy between the clinical trial population and the real-world population was present for several cancer types. The discrepancy was higher for studies that did not report race, mean difference - 8.8 years 4 (95% CI -12.6 to -5.0 years) vs. studies that did report the race, mean difference -5.1 years, (95% CI -6.4 to -3.7 years), p-value=0.04. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that a significant number of clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals suffer from racial and age disparity when compared to real-world populations and that the two factors may be interrelated. We recommend continued efforts to recruit diverse populations. In the meantime, reporting these characteristics for these crucial trials should be mandated. Citation Format: Thejus Jayakrishnan, Sonikpreet Aulakh, Mizba Baksh, Kianna Nguyen, Meghna Ailawadhi, Ayesha Samreen, Ricardo Parrondo, Taimur Sher, Vivek Roy, Rami Manochakian, Aneel Paulus, Asher Chanan-Khan, Sikander Ailawadhi. Disparity in race and age reporting in landmark cancer clinical trials: Underrepresentation of the traditionally underserved U.S. population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-104.

Background: Concern exists that the clinical trial populations differ from respective cancer populations in terms of their age distribution affecting the generalizability of the results, especially in underrepresented minorities. We hypothesized that the clinical trials that do not report race are likely to suffer from a higher degree of age disparity. Methods: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals from July 2007 to June 2019 were reviewed to identify oncology approvals, and trials with age details were selected. The outcomes studied were the weighted mean difference in age between the clinical trial population and real-world population for various cancers, the prevalence of race reporting and association of age and race reporting with each other. Results: Of the 261 trials, race was reported in 223 (85.4%) of the trials, while 38 trials (14.6%) had no mention of race. Race reporting improved minimally over time: 29 (85.3%) in 2007–2010 vs. 49 (80.3%) in 2011–2014 vs. 145 (85.4%) during the period 2015–2019 (p-value = 0.41). Age discrepancy between the clinical trial population and the real-world population was higher for studies that did not report race (mean difference −8.8 years (95% CI −12.6 to −5.0 years)) vs. studies that did report it (mean difference −5.1 years, (95% CI −6.4 to −3.7 years), p-value = 0.04). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that a significant number of clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals suffer from racial and age disparity when compared to real-world populations, and that the two factors may be interrelated. We recommend continued efforts to recruit diverse populations.