Bauer, Cindy S.

Abstract Inborn errors of immunity may present with susceptibility to coccidioidomycosis. This is especially so in disorders impairing the interferon-γ and interleukin 12 signaling axis. We describe the first case of cytidine nucleotide triphosphate synthetase 1 (CTPS1) deficiency, a combined immunodeficiency impairing lymphocyte proliferation, presenting with coccidioidomycosis.

Abstract Purpose:The incidence of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the United States was reported as 1 in 58,000 live births. In Arizona, it was anticipated that newborn screening would identify two to four cases of SCID per year. This estimate did not consider ethnic nuances in Arizona, with higher percentages of American Indian and Hispanic populations compared to national percentages. The true incidence of SCID and non SCID T-cell lymphopenia have not previously been reported in Arizona. Methods:A retrospective chart review was performed of abnormal SCID Newborn Screening (NBS) tests from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, using data from the Arizona Department of Health Service and the Phoenix Children’s Hospital’s electronic medical record [IRB# 20-025]. Results: Seven infants were diagnosed with SCID, yielding an incidence of 1 in 22,819 live births. Four of these infants had Artemis type SCID. Eighteen infants were identified with an abnormal initial NBS which ultimately did not lead to a diagnosis of SCID. Four of these infants were diagnosed with congenital syndromes associated with T-cell lymphopenia. Infants of Hispanic ethnicity were over-represented in this cohort. Conclusion: NBS in Arizona confirmed an incidence more than 2.5 times that reported nationally. This increased incidence is likely reflective of Arizona’s unique population profile, with a higher percentage of American Indian population. The findings in our non-SCID cohort are in alignment with previously published data, except for a higher than anticipated number of infants of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, likely related to Arizona’s higher percentage of Hispanic/Latino population.

Background Diagnosis of non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders requires quantification of tissue eosinophils. Our objective was to evaluate eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a method for histologic diagnosis of eosinophilic gastritis (EG) and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of biopsies from pediatric EG/EoD cases and controls. Subjects with EG or EoD had ≥30 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf) in ≥5 hpf in the stomach and/or ≥3 hpf in the duodenum, respectively. Controls had no histopathologic diagnosis recorded. Tissue eosinophil counts were assessed by hematoxylin & eosin stains. EPX stains were assessed using a unique histopathologic scoring system. Slides were digitized and EPX+ staining area/mm 2 was quantified by image analysis. Results Twenty-six EG/EoD cases and 40 controls were analyzed. EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels were markedly elevated in EG/EoD (p ≤ 0.0001). Eosinophil density (eos/mm 2 ) correlated strongly with EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels in the stomach (r ≥ 0.77) and moderately with EPX scores and EPX/mm 2 levels in the duodenum (r ≥ 0.52); (p < 0.0001). EPX quantification identified EG/EoD subjects with high diagnostic accuracy (EPX score: AUC = 1 for EG and EoD; EPX/mm 2 : AUC = 0.98 (95%CI 0.96-1) for EG, AUC = 0.91 (95%CI 0.81-1) for EoD). Conclusion EPX-based assessment of eosinophilic inflammation may facilitate automated histologic diagnosis.

Background: Food protein‐induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-immunoglobulin E mediated food allergy that typically presents with repetitive emesis and may be associated with lethargy, marked pallor, hypotension, hypothermia, and/or diarrhea. Although many foods are known to cause FPIES, peanut-triggered FPIES is emerging due to changes in the feeding practice guidelines, which recommends early peanut introduction in infants. Objective: We aimed to characterize peanut-triggered acute FPIES cases in our pediatric population and to describe their attributes, treatment, and outcomes. We hypothesized that increases in the incidence of peanut-triggered FPIES coincided with implementation of the guidelines for early peanut introduction. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pediatric patients who presented to Phoenix Children’s Hospital Emergency Department and subspecialty clinics during a 6-year period (January 2013 to September 2019). Results: Thirty-three cases of patients with acute FPIES were identified, five of which were peanut triggered. In those patients with peanut-triggered FPIES, the median age for peanut introduction was 7 months (range, 5‐24 months). Two patients had positive peanut skin-prick test results. All five cases were identified in the past 2 years (2018 to 2019). No peanut-triggered reactions were documented in the preceding 4-year period (2013 to 2017). Conclusion: Peanut may be an emerging trigger of acute FPIES, coinciding with an earlier introduction of peanut in the infant diet after implementation of the new addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy. Oats and rice were the most common triggers of acute FPIES in our cohort. Further study will help clarify the significance and reproducibility of these findings.