Singh, Mandeep

Objective: To determine among community heart failure (HF) patients whether frailty is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visits and death, independently of comorbidities. Background: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes in some populations; however the prognostic value of frailty among HF patients is not fully documented, particularly for healthcare utilization. Methods: Olmsted, Dodge and Fillmore County residents with HF between 10/2007 and 12/2010 were prospectively recruited to undergo frailty assessment. Frailty was defined as 3 or more of the following: unintentional weight loss >10 lbs. in 1 year, physical exhaustion, weak grip strength, and slowness and low activity measured by the SF-12 physical component score. Intermediate frailty was defined as having 1-2 components. To account for repeated events, Anderson-Gill modeling was used to determine if frailty predicted hospitalization or ED visits. Cox proportional hazards regression examined associations between frailty and death. Results: Among 409 patients (mean age 73±13, 58% male), 19% were frail and 55% had intermediate frailty. Within one year, 449 hospitalizations, 523 ED visits and 34 deaths occurred. There was a positive graded association between frailty and hospitalization and ED visits (Table). After adjustment for age, sex, ejection fraction and comorbidity, frailty was associated with an 80% increased risk of hospitalization and a 60% increased risk of ED visits. Frailty was also associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of death after adjustment. Conclusion: In the community, frailty is prevalent and is a strong and independent predictor of hospitalizations, ED visits and death among HF patients. As it is independent from coexisting comorbidities, frailty defines new avenues for intervention and should be formally assessed clinically. Hazard Ratios (95% CI) for Hospitalizations, Emergency Department Visits and Death by Frailty Status Not Frail Intermediate Frail Frail P for trend Hospitalization Crude 1.00 1.46 (1.05-2.02) 2.15 (1.45-3.19) <0.001 Fully-adjusted 1.00 1.29 (0.94-1.77) 1.82 (1.22-2.73) 0.005 Emergency Department Visits Crude 1.00 1.59 (1.14-2.21) 1.88 (1.22-2.90) 0.002 Fully-adjusted 1.00 1.46 (1.05-2.05) 1.58 (1.01-2.48) 0.034 Death Crude 1.00 1.40 (0.73-2.69) 3.98 (2.01-7.90) <0.001 Fully-adjusted 1.00 0.87 (0.44-1.73) 2.42 (1.19-4.95) 0.003

Objective: To compare two measures of frailty in a community cohort of heart failure (HF) patients. Background: Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic indicator in HF. Several methods have been proposed to measure frailty. Some conceptualize frailty as a biological phenotype, while others define it as an accumulation of deficits (impairments, disabilities, comorbid diseases), termed the Cumulative Deficit Index (CDI). Each approach has conceptual strengths and limitations; a distinct feature of the CDI is the ability to extract data from medical records. These two methods have never been compared in a community HF cohort. Methods: Olmsted, Dodge and Fillmore County, MN residents with HF between 10/2007 and 12/2010 were prospectively recruited to assess the frailty phenotype. The biological frailty phenotype was defined as ≥3 of the following: unintentional weight loss >10 lbs. in 1 year, physical exhaustion, weak grip strength, and slowness and low activity measured by the SF-12 physical component score. Intermediate frailty was defined as having 1–2 components. The CDI was based on 33 deficits and defined as the proportion of deficits present for each patient. Results: Among 131 patients (mean age 70.5±14, 62% male), according to the biological frailty phenotype definition 18% were frail, 50% intermediate frail and 31% not frail. The CDI ranged from 0.03–0.70, with a mean (SD) of 0.22 (0.12). The CDI was significantly correlated with the frailty phenotype (r=0.59, p<0.001). The mean (SD) of the CDI was 0.35 (0.14), 0.21 (0.10) and 0.15 (0.07) among the frail, intermediate frail and not frail phenotypes (Figure). Conclusion: The CDI is significantly associated with the biological frailty phenotype and can thus be used as an alternative approach to measure frailty in HF. As the components of the biological frailty phenotype are not routinely assessed clinically, the CDI, which can be ascertained from medical records, is a feasible approach to ascertain frailty in large cohorts.

Background: The presence of frailty increases the risk of long-term mortality for a myriad of reasons, but its association with cardiac-specific mortality among the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We sought to determine the relationship between frailty and cause-specific (cardiac versus non-cardiac) mortality among elderly patients undergoing PCI. Methods: A prospective cohort of elderly (>65 years) patients undergoing PCI at Mayo Clinic between October 2005 and September 2008 were tested for frailty using the Fried criteria. Vital status was prospectively monitored including evaluation of death certificates, telephone interviews and review of autopsy/medical records. Results: Frailty data was obtained in 428 (84%) of 508 elderly patients (median age 74.2 years [SD 6.4, range 65-100]; 59% male). Of these, 92 (21%) patients were frail while 231 (54%) had intermediate frailty and 105(25%) were not frail. Frail patients were older than intermediate and non-frail patients (77.6 vs 74.3 vs 71.0 years; p<0.001) and had more comorbidities (mean Charlson index 4.6 vs 3.9 vs 2.8; p<0.001). There were 113 deaths (26% of cohort) during 5.1 median years of follow-up, of which 77 (68%) were classified as non-cardiac and 36 (32%) which were classified as cardiac. Frailty at baseline was associated with poor overall survival compared to non-frail patients (HR 6.1, 95% CI 3.2, 11.6; p<0.001). The estimated effect of frailty was nearly 3 times greater for cardiac mortality (HR 13.1, 95% CI 3.0, 57.0; p=0.001) than non-cardiac mortality (HR 4.6, 95% CI 2.2, 9.7; p<0.001). These findings remained significant following multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: Frailty is common among elderly patients undergoing PCI and is associated with poor overall survival and both cardiac and non-cardiac causes of death.

Background: Transthoracic echocardiography is the mainstay of cardiac imaging and is highly dependent upon cardiac sonographers for whom image acquisition can be physically demanding and associated with musculoskeletal pain. Prior studies are limited by the absence of adequate control groups and a lack of adjustment for potential confounders. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of work-related musculoskeletal pain in cardiac sonographers as compared to a large control group of non-invasive healthcare professionals with similar demographics. Methods: An electronic survey was administered to Mayo Clinic employees identified by human resources at six major patient care facilities in four different states. Results: There were 2682 employees within the departments of cardiology and radiology who were contacted and 1532 (57%) completed the survey. After exclusion of those who wear protective lead aprons, 517 employees comprised the control group and 66 cardiac sonographers made up the study group. Cardiac sonographers and the control group were similar in age, sex, BMI, length of employment and history of prior musculoskeletal pain. Cardiac sonographers reported work-related musculoskeletal pain more frequently than the control group (88% vs 40%; p<0.001). This association persisted after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, length of current employment and history of pre-existing musculoskeletal pain (OR 11.6; (95% CI 5.32, 25.5); p<0.001). Cardiac sonographers were more likely to seek medical care for their work-related pain (55% vs 21%; p<0.001) and to have missed work due to pain (35% vs 12%, p<0.001). Conclusions: In this multi-site case control study, cardiac sonographers experienced significantly more work-related pain and missed more work due to pain than a large control group of non-invasive healthcare professionals with similar demographics.

Background: Mortality benefit of routine intracoronary thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been questioned. The recent TASTE trial did not show a mortality benefit with thrombus aspiration at 1 month, however benefits from accompanying reductions in myocyte injury might accrue over time. A meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the effect of follow up duration on effectiveness of aspiration thrombectomy. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched through March, 2014. We included RCTs with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients randomized to aspiration thrombectomy prior to primary PCI compared with conventional primary PCI alone. Two individuals reviewed the trials for inclusion and extracted data from the RCTs. We used random-effects models. Results: Data were pooled from 16 RCTs with 11,649 patients. All-cause mortality was significantly lower with aspiration thrombectomy after at least 12 months of follow up (Odds ratio [OR] =0. 61; 95% CI 0.37-0.99; p=0. 05). Pooled data for other time frames, i.e in-hospital, 1 month, 6 month follow up, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of thrombus aspiration on mortality are not evident until 12 months post-procedure, consistent with the long-term effects of myocardial salvage. Subsequent trials evaluating thrombus removal should accordingly be powered for long-term mortality in addition to known procedural and angiographic endpoints.

Timed Up and Go test predicts one-year mortality among patients cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention Nadeem A. Khan, R. Jay Widmer, Amrit Kanwar, Mohammed A. Al-Hijji, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Ryan J. Lennon, Rajiv Gulati, Amir Lerman, Arashk Motiei, Mandeep Singh Background: Frailty is frequently seen in older adults and among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a reliable and validated measure of frailty. We aim to assess 1-year mortality and stratify patients based on the performance on the test. Methods: Patients ≥55 years and referred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory underwent the TUG, a simple test to measure static and dynamic balance. We timed the patients while they were instructed to rise from the chair, walk 3 meters (or 10 feet), turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down. Timing was divided in four categories [<7 sec (controls), 8-10 sec, 11-14 sec, and > 15 sec]. Mortality at one year was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Those with TUG >15s were older (75.8 ±9.1years vs. 71.2±9.2 years in controls; P<0.001) and more women (42% vs. 29%) had TUG >15s, P=0.002. Patients with TUG >15 s had a significantly increased risk of mortality on follow-up (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.97-7.66; P<0.001, Figure) which remained significant after adjusting for age and sex (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.05, 3.30). Conclusions: The TUG test predicts one year mortality among patients referred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. These data underscore the importance of frailty assessment in patients with CVD.

Background There are limited contemporary data on the use of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Adult (aged >18 years) acute myocardial infarction admissions were identified using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (2000–2017) and classified by tertiles of admission year. Outcomes of interest included temporal trends of CABG use; age‐, sex‐, and race‐stratified trends in CABG use; in‐hospital mortality; hospitalization costs; and hospital length of stay. Of the 11 622 528 acute myocardial infarction admissions, emergent CABG was performed in 1 071 156 (9.2%). CABG utilization decreased overall (10.5% [2000] to 8.7% [2017]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98–0.98]; P <0.001), in ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (10.2% [2000] to 5.2% [2017]; adjusted OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.95–0.95]; P <0.001) and non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (10.8% [2000] to 10.0% [2017]; adjusted OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99–0.99]; P <0.001), with consistent age, sex, and race trends. In 2012 to 2017, compared with 2000 to 2005, admissions receiving emergent CABG were more likely to have non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (80.5% versus 56.1%), higher rates of noncardiac multiorgan failure (26.1% versus 8.4%), cardiogenic shock (11.5% versus 6.4%), and use of mechanical circulatory support (19.8% versus 18.7%). In‐hospital mortality in CABG admissions decreased from 5.3% (2000) to 3.6% (2017) (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88–0.89 [ P <0.001]) in the overall cohort, with similar temporal trends in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. An increase in lengths of hospital stay and hospitalization costs was seen over time. Conclusions Utilization of CABG has decreased substantially in acute myocardial infarction admissions, especially in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Despite an increase in acuity and multiorgan failure, in‐hospital mortality consistently decreased in this population.

Introduction: Relationship of QOL and frailty are poorly defined. Hypothesis: To study the prevalence and prognosis of poor QOL in frail patients. Methods: Predismissal standardized tests for frailty and QOL in 2 cohorts were administered. In cohort 1, 629 patients ≥ 65 years underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2005-2008, frailty (Fried) and QOL [SF-36 and SAQ] were ascertained. Cohort 2 [921 patients, 535 PCI, ≥55 years] underwent cardiac catheterization from 2014-18, frailty (Rockwood) and QOL (Likert) were determined. Results: In cohort 1, 19%; and 20% in cohort 2 were frail. Lower median SAQ (58.9 vs. 82.2); physical (29.5 vs. 43.9) and mental (49.2 vs. 57.4) scores of SF-36 in cohort 1 higher rates of fair/poor health (56% vs 18%) in cohort 2 (all comparisons, p<0.001) was seen in frail patients. As compared to without, frail patients were 5 times more likely (59% vs. 11%, p<0.001) in cohort 1 and 7 times more likely (56% vs. 8%) in cohort 2 to have poor QOL. Adjusted three year all-cause death and death/myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly higher for patients undergoing PCI with frailty; [HR (95% CI) death, 4.20 (2.63, 6.68) and death or MI HR 2.72 (1.91, 3.87), p<0.001) and with poor QOL [HR death 2.47 (1.59, 3.84) and death or MI 1.61 (1.16, 2.24) p<0.001). There was no significant interaction between frailty and QOL (p=0.64) indicating their independent prognostic influence. Conclusions: Poor QOL is commonly seen with frailty. Both frailty and poor QOL had significant and independent association with long-term survival.

Abstract Aims There are limited contemporary data on the use of initial fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). This study sought to compare the outcomes of STEMI-CS receiving initial fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods Using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2009 to 2017, a comparative effectiveness study of adult (&gt;18 years) STEMI-CS admissions receiving pre-hospital/in-hospital fibrinolysis were compared with those receiving PPCI. Admissions with alternate indications for fibrinolysis and STEMI-CS managed medically or with surgical revascularization (without fibrinolysis) were excluded. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, development of non-cardiac organ failure, complications, hospital length of stay, hospitalization costs, use of palliative care, and do-not-resuscitate status. Results During 2009–2017, 5297 and 110 452 admissions received initial fibrinolysis and PPCI, respectively. Compared with those receiving PPCI, the fibrinolysis group was more often non-White, with lower co-morbidity, and admitted on weekends and to small rural hospitals (all P &lt; 0.001). In the fibrinolysis group, 95.3%, 77.4%, and 15.7% received angiography, PCI, and coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively. The fibrinolysis group had higher rates of haemorrhagic complications (13.5% vs. 9.9%; P &lt; 0.001). The fibrinolysis group had comparable all-cause in-hospital mortality [logistic regression analysis: 28.8% vs. 28.5%; propensity-matched analysis: 30.8% vs. 30.3%; adjusted odds ratio 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.90–1.05); P = 0.50]. The fibrinolysis group had comparable rates of acute organ failure, hospital length of stay, rates of palliative care referrals, do-not-resuscitate status use, and lesser hospitalization costs. Conclusions The use of initial fibrinolysis had comparable in-hospital mortality than those receiving PPCI in STEMI-CS in the contemporary era in this large national observational study.

AbstractDespite the widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention and modern antithrombotic therapy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the leading cause of death in the United States and remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Certain high-risk patients present a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. The widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention in addition to modern antithrombotic therapy has resulted in substantial improvement in the short- and long-term prognosis following STEMI. In this review, we aim to provide a brief analysis of the state-of-the-art treatment for patients presenting with STEMI, focusing on cardiogenic shock, current treatment and controversies, cardiac arrest, and diagnosis and treatment of mechanical complications, as well as multivessel and left main-related STEMI.