Mukherjee, Debabrata

ABSTRACTBackgroundMyeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk including acute coronary syndrome. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as the in‐hospital characteristics and outcomes for MPN patients.AimsWe aimed to evaluate the temporal trends and outcomes of PCI among patients with MPN.Methods and ResultsThe National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was queried to identify all PCI hospitalizations. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients with and without MPN following PCI were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to compare outcomes between MPN and non‐MPN groups. 2,237,210 PCI hospitalizations with 7560 (0.27%) patients with MPN were included in this study. Throughout the study period, the prevalence of MPN among PCI admissions remained stable (p‐value for trend = 0.12). Within the MPN subgroup, essential thrombocythemia (ET) was the predominant condition (53.2). Patients with MPN had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than non‐MPN patients. Following PSM, MPNs were significantly associated with a higher risk of blood transfusions (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.22−2.24, p = 0.001) and AKI (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.17−1.65, p < 0.001). In contrast, the risk of in‐hospital mortality (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.83−1.69, p = 0.354 and bleeding (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.90−2.27, p = 0.127) did not significantly differ between the two groups.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that while the prevalence of MPN among patients undergoing PCI remained stable, those with MPN faced higher risks of bleeding, blood transfusion and acute kidney injury. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying reasons for these increased risks and to improve outcomes in this high‐risk group.

Background Although myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women, it is unknown whether sex is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sex differences and outcomes of patients with MINOCA. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. End points were pooled using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman random‐effects model as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. Nine studies, involving 30 281 patients with MINOCA (comprising 18 079 women and 12 202 men), were included in the study. Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke compared with men. The median duration of follow‐up was 3.5 years, with an interquartile range of 2.2 to 4.2 years. Pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all‐cause mortality (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87–1.22]), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89–1.58]), heart failure (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.57–3.03]), stroke (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.56–2.26]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.29–3.76]) between the 2 groups. Regarding short‐term outcomes, women had a significantly higher risk of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.16–1.53]) whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of in‐hospital mortality (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64–1.28]) between the 2 patient groups. Conclusions Despite the differences in demographics and comorbidity profiles, there was no significant difference in the long‐term outcomes for patients with MINOCA between sexes. However, it is noteworthy that women experienced a higher risk of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men.

Background: Aspirin is the most frequently used antiplatelet monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD. Trials comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12i versus aspirin have shown variable results. Methods: Medline, Embase, & Cochrane Central databases were searched to identify RCTs comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12i versus aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD (ischemic stroke, coronary, or peripheral artery disease). The primary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, & major bleeding. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) & the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Higgins I 2 value. Results: 9 eligible RCTs (5 with clopidogrel & 4 with ticagrelor) with 62,336 patients were included in our analyses. Monotherapy with P2Y12i significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 11% (0.89, 95% CI 0.84 - 0.95, I 2 =0), & MI by 19% (0.81, 95% CI 0.71 - 0.92, I 2 =0) as compared with aspirin monotherapy (Figure). There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke (0.85, 95% CI 0.73-1.01), & all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% CI 0.92 - 1.11) between the 2 treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding with P2Y12i monotherapy as compared with aspirin (0.97, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.43, I 2 =0). Results were consistent irrespective of the P2Y12i. Conclusion: P2Y12i monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction in atherothrombotic events as compared with aspirin alone without an increased risk of major bleeding.

Background: Mortality benefit of routine intracoronary thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been questioned. The recent TASTE trial did not show a mortality benefit with thrombus aspiration at 1 month, however benefits from accompanying reductions in myocyte injury might accrue over time. A meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the effect of follow up duration on effectiveness of aspiration thrombectomy. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched through March, 2014. We included RCTs with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients randomized to aspiration thrombectomy prior to primary PCI compared with conventional primary PCI alone. Two individuals reviewed the trials for inclusion and extracted data from the RCTs. We used random-effects models. Results: Data were pooled from 16 RCTs with 11,649 patients. All-cause mortality was significantly lower with aspiration thrombectomy after at least 12 months of follow up (Odds ratio [OR] =0. 61; 95% CI 0.37-0.99; p=0. 05). Pooled data for other time frames, i.e in-hospital, 1 month, 6 month follow up, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Beneficial effects of thrombus aspiration on mortality are not evident until 12 months post-procedure, consistent with the long-term effects of myocardial salvage. Subsequent trials evaluating thrombus removal should accordingly be powered for long-term mortality in addition to known procedural and angiographic endpoints.