Back to Authors

Song, Allisa J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-9061

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED DIAGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA
Wang, Kenny Y. , Xu, Timothy T. , Mogil, Rachel S., Song, Allisa J. , White, Launia J. , Hodge, David O. , Dalvin, Lauren A. , Dalvin, Lauren A

Retina | May 29, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1800-1806

10.1097/iae.0000000000004169 Get It

Purpose: To identify demographic and clinical factors associated with delayed diagnosis in patients with primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL). Methods: Retrospective, tertiary referral center-based cohort study of all patients at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of VRL from January 1, 2000, to October 31, 2022. Results: There were 87 patients included during the 22-year study period with 73 patients (83.9%) diagnosed with VRL upon initial evaluation at the tertiary center, with the other 14 patients (16.1%) diagnosed later. The median referral time was 4.8 months (range: 0–113 months). Patients who received an initial diagnosis of inflammatory uveitis or another incorrect diagnosis elsewhere were referred slower than those initially diagnosed with VRL (P = 0.04). The most common incorrect initial diagnosis from an outside institution was inflammatory uveitis (n = 35, 40.2%). When patients were split into four groups based on referral time, prior use of corticosteroids was associated with a significant delay in referral (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Diagnosing VRL continues to be challenging, as months-long delays from initial evaluation to expert referral center evaluation are common. Prior use of corticosteroids was associated with delay in diagnosis and referral time, underscoring the need to increase awareness regarding differences between VRL and uveitis.
Patient Experience and Clinical Outcomes after Same-day Outpatient Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction Protocol during the Global Pandemic
Mohan, Anita T. , Murphy, Brenna M., Song, Allisa J. , Saifuddin, Hiba, Harmsen, William S. , Martinez‐Jorge, Jorys, Vijayasekaran, Aparna , MacArthur, Taleen A. , Murphy, Brenna, Degnim, Amy, Martinez-Jorge, Jorys, Degnim, Amy C. , Jakub, James W.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open | July 24, 2023 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e5183

10.1097/gox.0000000000005183 Get It

Background:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provoked rapid changes in clinical practice to accommodate mandated restrictions within healthcare delivery. This study reviewed patient-reported experiences and clinical outcomes after implementation of a same-day discharge protocol after mastectomy with immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction compared with our historical overnight stay protocol.Methods:This is a retrospective single-institution study of consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction between July 2019 and November 2020. A postoperative survey was completed by patients to evaluate satisfaction with perioperative communications, recovery, and their overall experience.Results:A total of 302 patients (100% women) underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction (174 pre-COVID-19, 128 during COVID-19). During COVID-19, 71% of patients were scheduled for a same-day discharge, among which 89% were successfully discharged the same day. Compared with pre-COVID-19, there were no differences in type of surgery, operative times, pain scores, 30-day readmission, or unplanned visits (allP> 0.05) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with pre-COVID-19, patients during the pandemic reported comparable satisfaction with their care experience and postoperative recovery (56% survey response rate). Patient satisfaction was also similar between those discharged the same day (n = 81) versus the next day (n = 47) during COVID-19.Conclusions:Same-day discharge is feasible, safe, and can provide similar patient-reported satisfaction and outcomes compared with traditional overnight stay. These data highlight the ability to deliver adaptable, high-quality breast cancer care, within the constraints of a global pandemic.
Risk Factors for Anteroposterior Implant Malposition in Postmastectomy Patients with Cohesive Round Implants
Mullen, Barbara , Vijayasekaran, Aparna , Martinez‐Jorge, Jorys, Yan, María , Song, Allisa J.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open | October 23, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 10S | Pages: 39-39

10.1097/01.gox.0000799284.69669.59 Get It

Efficacy and safety of blepharoptosis repair after incisional glaucoma surgery
Song, Allisa J. , Khanna, Cheryl L. , Jamali, Sepideh, Roddy, Gavin W. , Wagner, Lilly H.

European Journal of Ophthalmology | March 29, 2021 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 122-128

10.1177/11206721211006643 Get It

Purpose: There is an increased risk for development of blepharoptosis after incisional glaucoma surgery. Data on safety and efficacy of ptosis repair in this group of patients in limited. The goal of this study is to evaluate outcomes and identify potential risk factors for failure of ptosis repair in eyes with history of incisional glaucoma surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent incisional glaucoma surgery, specifically trabeculectomy or implantation of glaucoma drainage device (GDD), and subsequent ptosis repair at a single institution from 2009 to 2019. Ptosis surgery outcomes were compared to a control group who underwent ptosis repair after cataract surgery. Results: Seventy-eight eyes of 64 patients were included in the glaucoma surgery group. The rate of severe ptosis (margin reflex distance 1 ⩽ 0 mm) among glaucoma surgery patients was higher compared to control (35 of 78 (44.9%) vs 23 of 82 (28.6%). Ptosis repair was successful in 59 of 78 eyes (75.6%), which was similar to control. Risk for revision surgery was increased more than five-fold in the GDD group compared to control. There were no cases of early or late bleb-related complications. Conclusions: Ptosis repair can be performed safely in patients after incisional glaucoma surgery. Müller muscle conjunctival resection and external levator advancement are equally effective. Patients with history of GDD should be advised about the potentially increased risk of need for revision surgery.