Oh, Ju‐Hee

Abstract H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a uniformly lethal CNS cancer that predominately occurs in children. In the last decade, while studies revealing the molecular underpinnings of the disease have paved the way for novel therapeutic strategies, this tumor remains a death sentence. Our lab and others have identified numerous drugs of high interest for treating this devasting disease, however, every trial has failed to show benefit. Is our failure to translate these laboratory findings due to the fact we have not found the right drugs or treatment regimens yet? Or is this a failure to get the drugs to the tumor? Or is this simply a very bad disease to treat? The answer is likely multifactorial. Our lab, in collaboration with others, have strong data to show that simply getting drugs to the tumor will not result in a positive benefit. Most drugs are rapidly cleared from their target space. Utilizing techniques that increase the drug-tumor resonance time is necessary to translate our basic science findings to our patients. Picking the right drug and the delivery mechanism is not enough for a positive effect. Here, we assessed the efficacy of a previously identified inhibitor, alisertib, delivered by short-term convection-enhanced delivery or a continuous osmotic pump and found that continuous, direct delivery results in a significant increase in survival (p = 0.0002). Furthermore, long-term survivors showed a decreased tumor burden and on-target drug effects. These data support that translation into patients must consider three factors: 1) selection of a potent therapy, 2) selection of the proper delivery method for that therapy, 3) modulation to ensure that the therapy remains in the targeted tissue long enough for desired effect. Keeping these basic tenets at the forefront of development may finally lead to a more effective treatment strategy for this devastating disease

AbstractBrain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood–brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the ‘normal’ BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB–limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, fatal brainstem tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors, like DMG, at cytotoxic concentrations. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has emerged as a drug delivery technique that bypasses the BBB through a direct interstitial infusion under a pressure gradient. However, drug distribution and clearance from the brain following CED is poorly understood and has been cited as a potential reason for the lack of efficacy observed in prior clinical trials. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand how two small molecule inhibitors (alisertib, ponatinib) that inhibit cell growth and proliferation in DMG cells in vitro distribute and clear from the brain following CED to the brainstem. METHODS Sprague-dawley rats underwent a single 60mL CED infusion of drug to the brainstem (200mM alisertib, 10mM ponatinib) and were sacrificed 0.083, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours following the completion of the infusion. Brains were dissected and drug concentration was determined via HPLC analysis. RESULTS No rats showed any clinical or neurological signs of toxicity post-infusion. Both drugs showed significant differences in drug concentration based on anatomical brain region where higher concentrations were observed in the pons and cerebellum compared to the cortex. Drug half-life in the brain was ~0.5 hours for alisertib and ~1 hour for ponatinib, but this was not significantly increased following co-administration of elacridar, a BBB efflux pump inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that elimination of drugs from the brain in a complex, multifactorial mechanism that warrants further preclinical investigation prior to the initiation of a clinical trial.

Abstract Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, uniformly fatal brain tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), including drug efflux pumps, prevent numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors at cytotoxic concentrations. Alisertib is an aurora kinase inhibitor that was previously identified in a drug screen as a compound of interest. However, its ability to penetrate the BBB is not well established. The goals of this study were two-fold: 1) determine the CNS distribution and clearance rates of alisertib following systemic delivery and if the BBB efflux pumps, Pgp and BCRP, alter distribution and clearance. 2) Compare alisertib distribution and clearance following convection-enhanced delivery to systemic results. WT and Pgp/BCRP knockout mice and Sprague-dawley rats underwent tail vein injection (mice and rats) or convection-enhanced delivery to the brainstem (rats only) of alisertib and sacrificed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24hours. The plasma and brain were collected and analyzed for alisertib concentration by HPLC-MS/MS. We found that in both mice and rats, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially. Overall, Alisertib was found to be 3.14% brain penetrant. In Pgp/BCRP knockout mice, alisertib concentration in the plasma and brain decreased biexponentially, but was detected at higher concentration at all time points in the brain compared to WT mice. This resulted in a higher brain penetrance (17.26%). Differences based on anatomical brain region were significant in those rats which received convection-enhanced delivery. Alisertib was found in higher concentration in the pons and cerebellum compared to systemic delivery, but lower concentrations in the cortex and plasma. These results suggest that drug clearance may be a general mechanism limiting efficacy of drugs of interest and should be carefully considered during preclinical evaluation.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common deadly malignant brain cancer of the central nervous system, with a median survival of 12–15 months. Scientific advancements are lacking in developing effective therapies for both primary GBM, as well as secondary GBMs, that typically originate as malignant transformation of lower-grade isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1-mutant tumors. The unique metabolomic profile of IDH1-mutant tumors presents opportunities to develop biomarker signatures of therapeutic efficacy. Microdialysis is an extracellular fluid sampling collection technique utilizing a perfused semipermeable catheter to permit diffusion of molecules between brain interstitium and the perfusate. We hypothesized that microdialysis may identify a metabolomics-based biomarker response to therapy in IDH1-mutant tumors. To test this hypothesis, orthotopic xenografts were generated from patient-derived xenografts (PDX) harboring mutant IDH-1 (R132H). Perfusates were collected from intra-cranial tumors in athymic nude mice sampled at baseline and 72h post treatment with temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating agent used to treat IDH1-mutant gliomas, compared with vehicle treatment. Perfusates were analyzed via untargeted metabolomic profiling using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Tumor specific metabolites such as (D)-2 hydroxyglutarate, were detected in microdialysate from IDH-1 mutant tumor bearing mice compared to non-tumor bearing mice. We also found high levels of metabolites such as 5-methylthioadenosine, and dimethylarginine and wide range of amino acids in microdialysate from IDH-1 mutant tumor bearing mice. TMZ treatment induced changes to metabolites in creatine and histidine metabolism. Our results indicate that microdialysis is a feasible technology to identify metabolomics-based biomarkers in IDH1-mutant gliomas and their response to therapy. We suggest that in vivo intratumoral microdialysis over several days could yield metabolic pharmacodynamic biomarkers of value to therapeutic translation for IDH-mutant gliomas.