Fleming, Derek

ABSTRACTIntraluminal infection of central venous catheters, used for long‐term treatment, can result in central line‐associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). These infections can be challenging to prevent and treat due to formation of biofilms within catheter lumens, which shield bacteria from the human immune response and conventional antimicrobial therapies. Preventing bacterial colonization of catheter hubs is a strategy to prevent CLABSI. To address this, we developed a nonantibiotic, animal‐ready electrochemical catheter hub (e‐catheter hub), operated by a wearable, battery‐powered micropotentiostat (MP), that internally generates tunable hypochlorous acid (HOCl) for preventing intraluminal infection. The design evaluated three different electrode materials—titanium, platinum, and gold—for HOCl generation and biocidal activity, using working and counter electrodes of the same materials and a silver/silver chloride‐plated wire as a quasi‐reference electrode. e‐catheter hubs operated by MPs at 1.5 VAg/AgCl for 3 h generated HOCl, reducing Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC‐17978 below the detection limit (average reduction of 4.40 ± 0.05 log10 CFU/mL). The efficacy of e‐catheter hubs operated by MPs in generating HOCl and achieving biocidal activity is comparable to that of a commercial potentiostat. This study represents the first step in developing a localized, nonantibiotic strategy to mitigate CLABSI risk.

ABSTRACT Although lung transplant recipients who develop Ureaplasma- associated hyperammonemia syndrome are treated with Ureaplasma -targeted antibiotics, optimal therapy is incompletely defined, and typically not based on real-time antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. This study compared levofloxacin, azithromycin, and doxycycline prevention and treatment of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and Ureaplasma parvum (UP) infections in an immunosuppressed murine lung infection model. For prophylaxis, mice received antibiotics before infection with UP-FS (susceptible to all study antibiotics), UP-AzmR (azithromycin-resistant), UP-LevR (levofloxacin-resistant), or UU-DoxR (doxycycline-resistant), with lung bacterial loads (color changing units [CCUs]) measured 18 hours following infection. For UP-FS, doxycycline was most active (Δ4.84 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.0006), followed by levofloxacin (Δ2.45 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.018), with azithromycin yielding a nonsignificant CCU reduction. Doxycycline (Δ1.9 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.0025) and levofloxacin (Δ1.3 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.004) showed activity against UP-AzmR. Only doxycycline showed activity against UP-LevR (Δ2.28 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.0002), and only azithromycin showed activity against UU-DoxR (Δ0.67 log 10 CCU/g; P = 0.0175). For treatment, antibiotics were administered 24 hours following infection; doxycycline significantly reduced bacterial loads of all study isolates, except UU-DoxR. In addition, azithromycin was active against UP-LevR (Δ1.21 log 10 CCU/g reduction; P = 0.0003). In summary, except for doxycycline-resistant UU, doxycycline was active in preventing and treating Ureaplasma lung infection in immunosuppressed mice.

Abstract Background Chronic periprosthetic joint infection is commonly managed with two-stage exchange. Clinically, evaluation for persistent infection at the second stage of exchange may inform management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of periprosthetic tissue and antimicrobial-containing cement spacer sonicate fluid cultures at the second stage of two-stage exchange surgeries. Methods Periprosthetic tissue and sonicate fluid cultures of hip and knee cement spacers removed at the second stage of two-stage exchange surgeries between January 2010 and December 2020 were studied. Two or more positive tissue cultures yielding the same organism were considered positive. For sonicate culture, ≥20 CFU/10 ml of sonicate fluid was considered positive. Persistent infection was defined by the presence of at least one of the following: intraoperative purulence, sinus tract, histopathology showing acute inflammation, or clinical signs of infection. Cement spacers were removed as part of spacer exchange if persistent infection was suspected or for insertion of a new implant if infection was not suspected. Results 172 cultures were evaluated, 69% from knees and 31% from hips. Median patient age was 64 years; 53% were men. 38/172 (22%) of cement spacers were removed as part of a spacer exchange and 134/172 (78%) for insertion of a new implant. Persistent infection was present in 49/172 (28%). 18/172 (10%) received antibiotics 2 weeks before culture, including 8/18 (44%) undergoing spacer exchange. For persistent infections, tissue and sonicate culture were positive in 11/49 and 5/49, respectively. In the 123 without persistent infection, no tissue or sonicate cultures were positive. When a new implant was placed, persistent infection was observed in 18/134 (13%), and tissue and sonicate cultures were positive in 4/18 and 1/18, respectively. When a new implant was placed (116) and no infection was found, all tissue and sonicate cultures were negative. After spacer exchange, persistent infection was present in 31/38 (81%), and tissue and sonicate cultures were positive in 8/31 and 3/31, respectively; in the 7 without infection, there were no positive cultures. Conclusion Sonication culture of cement spacers and periprosthetic tissue cultures have low sensitivities for persistent infection. Disclosures Matthew Abdel, MD, Stryker: Advisor/Consultant|Stryker: Royalties Nicholas Bedard, MD, Stryker: Advisor/Consultant Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria

Abstract Background Wound biofilm infections impact ∼2% of the United States and at-risk individuals often have underlying morbidities such as diabetes. Antibiotics and topical approaches like debridement or silver dressings have had limited success, underscoring a need for strategies that efficiently target pathogens in wound beds. Methods We developed a hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) generating electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) composed of carbon fabric electrodes separated by cotton fabric with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (RE) placed between cotton fabric layers. The e-bandage is controlled by a wearable micropotentiostat (MP); H2O2 is generated by O2 + 2H++ 2e- → H2O2. O2 is dissolved on a primary working electrode with negative polarity compared to the RE while a positively polarized secondary counter electrode generates H+ and e-. The H2O2 e-bandage/MP device has in vitro activity against mono- and dual-species bacterial and fungal biofilms. We showed that the H2O2 e-bandage decreased the burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance in a murine wound infection model. Given this, we initiated a H2O2 e-bandage safety assessment on healthy human skin. Here, testing of a non-polarized, circular (2 cm diameter) device pre-loaded with biocompatible hydrogel containing 0.9% NaCl is reported. Sterilized e-bandages assessed in a shelf-life study retained activity for two weeks. Adults with intact forearm skin were then recruited to the Clinical Research Trials Unit at the Mayo Clinic. Consented individuals had a non-polarized e-bandage covered by Tegaderm placed on their forearm. A MP enclosed in a biocompatible case was connected to the e-bandage and secured using skin tape. One day later, the device was removed and a follow-up phone call made six days later to assess for adverse effects. Results Three volunteers wearing a non-polarized H2O2 e-bandage experienced no discomfort, irritation, allergic reaction, or skin discoloration after device removal and seven days post device placement. Conclusion These preliminary studies combined with the previously performed murine bacterial biofilms work support further studies of this novel device for treating wound infections caused by antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria

Abstract Background Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) can experience hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) correlated with lung infection by ammonia-producing Ureaplasma species. HS in LTRs can be managed by Ureaplasma-directed antibiotic therapy; however, Ureaplasma species lack a cell wall, limiting treatment options. Precise guidelines for Ureaplasma-directed antibiotic therapy in LTRs is lacking, and antibiotic resistance may complicate treatment. Here, levofloxacin (LEV), azithromycin (AZM), and doxycycline (DOX) were tested against isolates of U. urealyticum and U. parvum with varying antibiotic resistance profiles, and efficacies compared.Fig 1.Antibiotic prophylaxis of murine infection by antibiotic resistant Ureaplasma isolates. Mice were prophylaxed with levofloxacin (LEV; 100 mg/kg SQ), azithromycin (AZM; 100 mg/kg PO), or doxycycline (DOX; 100 mg/kg IP) 12 hours prior to infection with isolates of Ureaplasma parvum or Ureaplasma urealyticum resistant to one or none of the antibiotics. 18 hours after infection, mice were sacrificed and lungs harvested, with resulting Ureaplasma loads quantified (color changing units: CCU). Control animals (CTRL) were given no antibiotics. Significance between groups was determined via Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. * p ≤0.05, **p ≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. Methods Mice were immunosuppressed using a combination of tacrolimus (1.2 mg/kg daily), mycophenolate mofetil (40 mg/kg daily), and methylprednisolone (20 mg/kg weekly) to mimic immunosuppression given to LTRs. Prophylactic antibiotics were given 12 hours prior to infection, including either LEV (100 mg/kg subcutaneously), AZM (100 mg/kg orally), or DOX (100 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Mice were then infected with Ureaplasma isolates resistant to one or none of the antibiotics, including U. parvum IDRL-10774 (fully susceptible), U parvum IDRL-10774R (IDLR-10774 with evolved AZM resistance; serial passage in sub-MIC AZM), U. parvum IDRL-11160 (LEV resistant), and U. urealyticum ATCC-33175 (DOX resistant). Mice were euthanized 18 hours post-infection, and lung bacterial loads (color changing units; CCU/gram) quantified. Results The effect of various antibiotic treatments against mouse lung infections with the four Ureaplasma isolates is displayed in Fig 1. Infection with IDRL-10774 (fully susceptible) and IDRL-11160 (LEV resistant) was only prevented by doxycycline (p=0.09 and p=0.01, respectively). For IDRL-10774, insignificant mean reductions (possibly due to a high standard deviation in the controls) were observed for both LEV (-106.9 CCU/g) and AZM (-105.25 CCU/g). IDRL-10774R (evolved AZM resistance) showed a complete loss of susceptibility to AZM compared to unevolved IDRL-10774. ATCC-33175 (DOX resistant) was not reduced by any antibiotics tested. Conclusion DOX was the most effective antibiotic tested, preventing lung infection by all isolates, except a DOX resistant isolate. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria

ABSTRACT Ureaplasma species can cause systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts, including lung transplant recipients. Here, we investigated the impact of prior exposure to Ureaplasma urealyticum on the risk of U. urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum infection in mice subjected to an immunosuppression regimen similar to that administered to solid organ transplant recipients. Mice were immunized with three intramuscular injections of U. urealyticum , with control mice injected with adjuvant only. Following immunization, mice received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone, and then were challenged with U. urealyticum or U. parvum intraperitoneally and intratracheally over 6 days. Relative U. urealyticum antibody levels in plasma were assessed over time, and lungs were harvested at sacrifice for bacterial load quantification, assessed using a color-changing unit assay. U. urealyticum antibody levels were higher in immunized compared with control animals ( P < 0.0001), even when animals were immunosuppressed. U. urealyticum and U. parvum lung burden was reduced in immunized compared with control mice (~6 log 10 reduction for U. urealyticum and <1 log 10 reduction for U. parvum ; P = 0.008 and 0.046, respectively). In summary, this study shows that prior exposure to live U. urealyticum provides some protection against infection with U. urealyticum . IMPORTANCE Ureaplasma -induced hyperammonemia syndrome is a rare but potentially deadly complication of solid organ transplantation, especially lung transplantation. The pathophysiology of this relatively recently recognized condition is poorly understood, and it is unclear what factors may influence patient susceptibility. This study investigates the possible protective effects of prior exposure to Ureaplasma urealyticum in a mouse model subjected to an immunosuppression regimen similar to that given to lung transplant recipients. The findings show that prior exposure could provide protection against Ureaplasma lung infection.

ABSTRACT Wound infections, exacerbated by the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens, necessitate innovative antimicrobial approaches. Polymicrobial infections, often involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), present challenges due to biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a potent antimicrobial agent, holds promise as an alternative therapy. An electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) that generates HOCl in situ via precise polarization controlled by a miniaturized potentiostat was evaluated for the treatment of murine wound biofilm infections containing both P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance and MRSA. Previously, HOCl-producing e-bandage was shown to reduce murine wound biofilms containing P. aeruginosa alone. Here, in 5-mm excisional skin wounds containing 48-h biofilms comprising MRSA and P. aeruginosa combined, polarized e-bandage treatment reduced MRSA by 1.1 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.026) vs non-polarized e-bandage treatment (no HOCl production), and 1.4 log 10 CFU/g (0.0015) vs Tegaderm only controls; P. aeruginosa was similarly reduced by 1.6 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0032) and 1.6 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0015), respectively. For wounds infected with MRSA alone, polarized e-bandage treatment reduced bacterial load by 1.1 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0048) and 1.3 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0048) compared with non-polarized e-bandage and Tegaderm only, respectively. The e-bandage treatment did not negatively impact wound healing or cause tissue toxicity. The addition of systemic antibiotics did not enhance the antimicrobial efficacy of e-bandages. This study provides additional evidence for the HOCl-producing e-bandage as a novel antimicrobial strategy for managing wound infections, including in the context of antibiotic resistance and polymicrobial infections. IMPORTANCE New approaches are needed to combat the rise of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The HOCl-producing electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) leverages in situ generation of HOCl, a natural biocide, for broad-spectrum killing of wound pathogens. Unlike traditional therapies that may exhibit limited activity against biofilms and antimicrobial-resistant organisms, the e-bandage offers a potent, standalone solution that does not contribute to further resistance or require adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Here, we show the ability of the e-bandage to address polymicrobial infection by antimicrobial resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , two commonly isolated, co-infecting wound pathogens. Effectiveness of the HOCl-producing e-bandage in reducing pathogen load while minimizing tissue toxicity and avoiding the need for systemic antibiotics underscores its potential as a tool in managing complex wound infections.

ABSTRACT Chronic wound infections can be difficult to treat and may lead to impaired healing and worsened patient outcomes. Novel treatment strategies are needed. This study evaluated the effects of intermittently produced hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), generated via an electrochemical bandage (e-bandage), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an agar membrane biofilm model. By changing the working electrode potential, the e-bandage generated either HOCl (1.5 V Ag/AgCl ) or H 2 O 2 (−0.6 V Ag/AgCl ). The degree of biocidal activity of intermittent treatment with HOCl and H 2 O 2 correlated with HOCl treatment time; HOCl treatment durations of 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 hours (with the rest of the 6-hour total treatment time devoted to H 2 O 2 generation) resulted in mean biofilm reductions of 1.36 ± 0.2, 2.22 ± 0.16, 3.46 ± 0.38, 4.63 ± 0.74, and 7.66 ± 0.5 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively, vs. non-polarized controls, respectively. However, application of H 2 O 2 immediately after HOCl treatment was detrimental to biofilm removal. For example, 3 hours HOCl treatment followed by 3 hours H 2 O 2 resulted in a 1.90 ± 0.84 log CFU/cm 2 lower mean biofilm reduction than 3 hours HOCl treatment followed by 3 hours non-polarization. HOCl generated over 3 hours exhibited biocidal activity for at least 7.5 hours after e-bandage operation ceased; 3 hours of HOCl generation followed by 7.5 hours of non-polarization resulted in a biofilm cell reduction of 7.92 ± 0.12 log CFU/cm 2 vs. non-polarized controls. Finally, intermittent treatment with HOCl (i.e., interspersed with periods of e-bandage non-polarization) for various intervals showed similar effects (approximately 6 log CFU/cm 2 reduction vs. non-polarized control) to continuous treatment with HOCl for 3 hours, followed by 3 hours of non-polarization. These findings suggest that timing and sequencing of HOCl and H 2 O 2 treatments are crucial for maximizing biofilm control when using an e-bandage strategy.

ABSTRACT The growing threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens necessitates the development of alternative antimicrobial approaches. This is particularly true for chronic wound infections, which commonly harbor biofilm-dwelling bacteria. A novel electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) delivering low-levels of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) was evaluated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa murine wound biofilms. 5 mm skin wounds were created on the dorsum of mice and infected with 10 6 colony-forming units (CFU) of P. aeruginosa . Biofilms were formed over 2 days, after which e-bandages were placed on the wound beds and covered with Tegaderm. Mice were administered Tegaderm-only (control), non-polarized e-bandage (no HOCl production), or polarized e-bandage (using an HOCl-producing potentiostat), with or without systemic amikacin. Purulence and wound areas were measured before and after treatment. After 48 hours, wounds were harvested for bacterial quantification. Forty-eight hours of polarized e-bandage treatment resulted in mean biofilm reductions of 1.4 log 10 CFUs/g ( P = 0.0107) vs non-polarized controls and 2.2 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.004) vs Tegaderm-only controls. Amikacin improved CFU reduction in Tegaderm-only ( P = 0.0045) and non-polarized control groups ( P = 0.0312) but not in the polarized group ( P = 0.3876). Compared to the Tegaderm-only group, there was less purulence in the polarized group ( P = 0.009). Wound closure was neither impeded nor improved by either polarized or non-polarized e-bandage treatment. Concurrent amikacin did not impact wound closure or purulence. In conclusion, an HOCl-producing e-bandage reduced P. aeruginosa in wound biofilms with no impairment in wound healing, representing a promising antibiotic-free approach for addressing wound infection.

Abstract Background Biofilms formed by antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wound beds present unique challenges in terms of treating wound infections. In this work, the in vivo anti-biofilm activity of a novel electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) designed to continuously deliver low amounts of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) was evaluated against wound biofilm infections caused by a clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to all antibiotic classes except aminoglycosides. Methods 5 mm skin wounds were created on the dorsal surface of Swiss-Webster mice and infected with 106 CFU of P. aeruginosa. Biofilms were allowed to form over 2 days, after which e-bandages with Tegaderm™ or Tegaderm only were placed on the wound beds. Specifically, mice were randomized to one of three experimental groups (n = 7-8): 1) Tegaderm only (control); 2) non-polarized e-bandage; 3) polarized e-bandage using a wearable potentiostat. After 48 hours, animals were sacrificed and 10 mm skin biopsies containing the wound and surrounding tissue were harvested for bacterial quantification. Histopathology was performed on H&E-stained sections of wound beds from each treatment group. Blood was screened with an inflammatory cytokine panel. Wound healing (% area reduction; digital measurement) and purulence (observational scoring) were assessed in pre- and post-treatment wounds. Results 48 hours of polarized e-bandage treatment resulted in a mean reduction of 1.86 log10 biofilm CFUs/g (p &lt; 0.0001) vs non-polarized controls, and 2.18 log10 CFU/g reduction (p &lt; 0.0001) vs Tegaderm only controls (polarized, 7.6 ± 0.66 log10 CFU/g; non-polarized, 9.45 ± 0.26 log+10 CFU/g; Tegaderm only, 9.78 ± 0.16 log10 CFU/g). Compared to Tegaderm only, purulence reduction and wound healing were significantly higher for both non-polarized (purulence - p &lt; 0.0001; healing - p &lt; 0.01 ) and polarized treatment (purulence - p &lt; 0.0001; healing - p &lt; 0.0001) groups, but were not significantly different from each other. Histopathology and blood inflammation panel testing showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusion An HOCl-producing e-bandage reduced P. aeruginosa in wound biofilms, representing a potential antibiotic-free strategy for the treatment of recalcitrant wound infections. Disclosures Audrey N. Schuetz, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant