Beyenal, Haluk

ABSTRACT Biofilms hinder wound infection healing, making wound infections a healthcare challenge for which innovative treatments are needed. A 1.77 cm 2 electrochemical bandage (e-bandage), which generates the biocide hypochlorous acid (HOCl), has shown promising anti-biofilm activity in vitro , ex vivo , and in vivo . The e-bandage is a three-electrode system operationalized by a hydrogel. In addition to providing a conductive electrolyte for the electrodes, the hydrogel provides a protective barrier for the wound. How different hydrogels impact e-bandage functionality is not completely defined. Here, the in vitro activity of seven clinically available hydrogels (xanthan gum, 3M, Duoderm, Prontosan, Purilon, Skintegrity, and Solosite) was evaluated with 1.77 cm 2 HOCl-generating e-bandages using a potentiostat with a multiplexer in a membrane biofilm model against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus IDRL-6169 and Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC-17978. When applied with polarized HOCl-producing e-bandages, all evaluated hydrogels except Solosite yielded ≥5.5 log 10 CFU/cm 2 reductions in bacterial quantities after 6 h of treatment, with most being below the detection limit at that time point. Prontosan exhibited antibacterial activity independent of e-bandage. Results of this study inform the selection of clinically available hydrogels that may be suitable for use with a 1.77 cm 2 HOCl-producing e-bandage. IMPORTANCE In this study, it was shown that some clinically available hydrogels, combined with a 1.77 cm 2 HOCl-generating electrochemical bandage, deliver time-dependent antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms, offering a potential approach to treat wound infections, including those caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.

ABSTRACT An electrochemical bandage (e‐bandage) that generates hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) through a combination of working, counter and reference electrodes used with an electrolyte‐providing hydrogel is being developed for wound infection management. e‐Bandage biocidal activity was previously demonstrated using Xanthan gum hydrogel. For clinical use, clinically used hydrogels would be ideal, but their use with the described e‐bandage has not been shown. The goal of this work was to evaluate the biocidal activity of off‐the‐shelf, clinically used hydrogels when used with a 1.77 cm 2 H 2 O 2 ‐producing e‐bandage. e‐Bandage electrochemical parameters and activity against methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus IDRL‐6169 and Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC‐17978 biofilms were assessed with six off‐the‐shelf hydrogels. Variations in hydrogel composition affected electrochemical parameters, which was associated with differences in biocidal activity. Results of this study inform the selection of off‐the‐shelf hydrogels for use with H 2 O 2 ‐producing e‐bandages.

ABSTRACTIntraluminal infection of central venous catheters, used for long‐term treatment, can result in central line‐associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). These infections can be challenging to prevent and treat due to formation of biofilms within catheter lumens, which shield bacteria from the human immune response and conventional antimicrobial therapies. Preventing bacterial colonization of catheter hubs is a strategy to prevent CLABSI. To address this, we developed a nonantibiotic, animal‐ready electrochemical catheter hub (e‐catheter hub), operated by a wearable, battery‐powered micropotentiostat (MP), that internally generates tunable hypochlorous acid (HOCl) for preventing intraluminal infection. The design evaluated three different electrode materials—titanium, platinum, and gold—for HOCl generation and biocidal activity, using working and counter electrodes of the same materials and a silver/silver chloride‐plated wire as a quasi‐reference electrode. e‐catheter hubs operated by MPs at 1.5 VAg/AgCl for 3 h generated HOCl, reducing Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC‐17978 below the detection limit (average reduction of 4.40 ± 0.05 log10 CFU/mL). The efficacy of e‐catheter hubs operated by MPs in generating HOCl and achieving biocidal activity is comparable to that of a commercial potentiostat. This study represents the first step in developing a localized, nonantibiotic strategy to mitigate CLABSI risk.

Abstract Background Wound biofilm infections impact ∼2% of the United States and at-risk individuals often have underlying morbidities such as diabetes. Antibiotics and topical approaches like debridement or silver dressings have had limited success, underscoring a need for strategies that efficiently target pathogens in wound beds. Methods We developed a hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) generating electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) composed of carbon fabric electrodes separated by cotton fabric with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (RE) placed between cotton fabric layers. The e-bandage is controlled by a wearable micropotentiostat (MP); H2O2 is generated by O2 + 2H++ 2e- → H2O2. O2 is dissolved on a primary working electrode with negative polarity compared to the RE while a positively polarized secondary counter electrode generates H+ and e-. The H2O2 e-bandage/MP device has in vitro activity against mono- and dual-species bacterial and fungal biofilms. We showed that the H2O2 e-bandage decreased the burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance in a murine wound infection model. Given this, we initiated a H2O2 e-bandage safety assessment on healthy human skin. Here, testing of a non-polarized, circular (2 cm diameter) device pre-loaded with biocompatible hydrogel containing 0.9% NaCl is reported. Sterilized e-bandages assessed in a shelf-life study retained activity for two weeks. Adults with intact forearm skin were then recruited to the Clinical Research Trials Unit at the Mayo Clinic. Consented individuals had a non-polarized e-bandage covered by Tegaderm placed on their forearm. A MP enclosed in a biocompatible case was connected to the e-bandage and secured using skin tape. One day later, the device was removed and a follow-up phone call made six days later to assess for adverse effects. Results Three volunteers wearing a non-polarized H2O2 e-bandage experienced no discomfort, irritation, allergic reaction, or skin discoloration after device removal and seven days post device placement. Conclusion These preliminary studies combined with the previously performed murine bacterial biofilms work support further studies of this novel device for treating wound infections caused by antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria

ABSTRACT Wound infections, exacerbated by the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens, necessitate innovative antimicrobial approaches. Polymicrobial infections, often involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), present challenges due to biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a potent antimicrobial agent, holds promise as an alternative therapy. An electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) that generates HOCl in situ via precise polarization controlled by a miniaturized potentiostat was evaluated for the treatment of murine wound biofilm infections containing both P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance and MRSA. Previously, HOCl-producing e-bandage was shown to reduce murine wound biofilms containing P. aeruginosa alone. Here, in 5-mm excisional skin wounds containing 48-h biofilms comprising MRSA and P. aeruginosa combined, polarized e-bandage treatment reduced MRSA by 1.1 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.026) vs non-polarized e-bandage treatment (no HOCl production), and 1.4 log 10 CFU/g (0.0015) vs Tegaderm only controls; P. aeruginosa was similarly reduced by 1.6 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0032) and 1.6 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0015), respectively. For wounds infected with MRSA alone, polarized e-bandage treatment reduced bacterial load by 1.1 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0048) and 1.3 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.0048) compared with non-polarized e-bandage and Tegaderm only, respectively. The e-bandage treatment did not negatively impact wound healing or cause tissue toxicity. The addition of systemic antibiotics did not enhance the antimicrobial efficacy of e-bandages. This study provides additional evidence for the HOCl-producing e-bandage as a novel antimicrobial strategy for managing wound infections, including in the context of antibiotic resistance and polymicrobial infections. IMPORTANCE New approaches are needed to combat the rise of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The HOCl-producing electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) leverages in situ generation of HOCl, a natural biocide, for broad-spectrum killing of wound pathogens. Unlike traditional therapies that may exhibit limited activity against biofilms and antimicrobial-resistant organisms, the e-bandage offers a potent, standalone solution that does not contribute to further resistance or require adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Here, we show the ability of the e-bandage to address polymicrobial infection by antimicrobial resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , two commonly isolated, co-infecting wound pathogens. Effectiveness of the HOCl-producing e-bandage in reducing pathogen load while minimizing tissue toxicity and avoiding the need for systemic antibiotics underscores its potential as a tool in managing complex wound infections.

ABSTRACT Chronic wound infections can be difficult to treat and may lead to impaired healing and worsened patient outcomes. Novel treatment strategies are needed. This study evaluated the effects of intermittently produced hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), generated via an electrochemical bandage (e-bandage), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an agar membrane biofilm model. By changing the working electrode potential, the e-bandage generated either HOCl (1.5 V Ag/AgCl ) or H 2 O 2 (−0.6 V Ag/AgCl ). The degree of biocidal activity of intermittent treatment with HOCl and H 2 O 2 correlated with HOCl treatment time; HOCl treatment durations of 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 hours (with the rest of the 6-hour total treatment time devoted to H 2 O 2 generation) resulted in mean biofilm reductions of 1.36 ± 0.2, 2.22 ± 0.16, 3.46 ± 0.38, 4.63 ± 0.74, and 7.66 ± 0.5 log CFU/cm 2 , respectively, vs. non-polarized controls, respectively. However, application of H 2 O 2 immediately after HOCl treatment was detrimental to biofilm removal. For example, 3 hours HOCl treatment followed by 3 hours H 2 O 2 resulted in a 1.90 ± 0.84 log CFU/cm 2 lower mean biofilm reduction than 3 hours HOCl treatment followed by 3 hours non-polarization. HOCl generated over 3 hours exhibited biocidal activity for at least 7.5 hours after e-bandage operation ceased; 3 hours of HOCl generation followed by 7.5 hours of non-polarization resulted in a biofilm cell reduction of 7.92 ± 0.12 log CFU/cm 2 vs. non-polarized controls. Finally, intermittent treatment with HOCl (i.e., interspersed with periods of e-bandage non-polarization) for various intervals showed similar effects (approximately 6 log CFU/cm 2 reduction vs. non-polarized control) to continuous treatment with HOCl for 3 hours, followed by 3 hours of non-polarization. These findings suggest that timing and sequencing of HOCl and H 2 O 2 treatments are crucial for maximizing biofilm control when using an e-bandage strategy.

ABSTRACT The growing threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens necessitates the development of alternative antimicrobial approaches. This is particularly true for chronic wound infections, which commonly harbor biofilm-dwelling bacteria. A novel electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) delivering low-levels of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) was evaluated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa murine wound biofilms. 5 mm skin wounds were created on the dorsum of mice and infected with 10 6 colony-forming units (CFU) of P. aeruginosa . Biofilms were formed over 2 days, after which e-bandages were placed on the wound beds and covered with Tegaderm. Mice were administered Tegaderm-only (control), non-polarized e-bandage (no HOCl production), or polarized e-bandage (using an HOCl-producing potentiostat), with or without systemic amikacin. Purulence and wound areas were measured before and after treatment. After 48 hours, wounds were harvested for bacterial quantification. Forty-eight hours of polarized e-bandage treatment resulted in mean biofilm reductions of 1.4 log 10 CFUs/g ( P = 0.0107) vs non-polarized controls and 2.2 log 10 CFU/g ( P = 0.004) vs Tegaderm-only controls. Amikacin improved CFU reduction in Tegaderm-only ( P = 0.0045) and non-polarized control groups ( P = 0.0312) but not in the polarized group ( P = 0.3876). Compared to the Tegaderm-only group, there was less purulence in the polarized group ( P = 0.009). Wound closure was neither impeded nor improved by either polarized or non-polarized e-bandage treatment. Concurrent amikacin did not impact wound closure or purulence. In conclusion, an HOCl-producing e-bandage reduced P. aeruginosa in wound biofilms with no impairment in wound healing, representing a promising antibiotic-free approach for addressing wound infection.

Abstract Background Biofilms formed by antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wound beds present unique challenges in terms of treating wound infections. In this work, the in vivo anti-biofilm activity of a novel electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) designed to continuously deliver low amounts of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) was evaluated against wound biofilm infections caused by a clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to all antibiotic classes except aminoglycosides. Methods 5 mm skin wounds were created on the dorsal surface of Swiss-Webster mice and infected with 106 CFU of P. aeruginosa. Biofilms were allowed to form over 2 days, after which e-bandages with Tegaderm™ or Tegaderm only were placed on the wound beds. Specifically, mice were randomized to one of three experimental groups (n = 7-8): 1) Tegaderm only (control); 2) non-polarized e-bandage; 3) polarized e-bandage using a wearable potentiostat. After 48 hours, animals were sacrificed and 10 mm skin biopsies containing the wound and surrounding tissue were harvested for bacterial quantification. Histopathology was performed on H&E-stained sections of wound beds from each treatment group. Blood was screened with an inflammatory cytokine panel. Wound healing (% area reduction; digital measurement) and purulence (observational scoring) were assessed in pre- and post-treatment wounds. Results 48 hours of polarized e-bandage treatment resulted in a mean reduction of 1.86 log10 biofilm CFUs/g (p < 0.0001) vs non-polarized controls, and 2.18 log10 CFU/g reduction (p < 0.0001) vs Tegaderm only controls (polarized, 7.6 ± 0.66 log10 CFU/g; non-polarized, 9.45 ± 0.26 log+10 CFU/g; Tegaderm only, 9.78 ± 0.16 log10 CFU/g). Compared to Tegaderm only, purulence reduction and wound healing were significantly higher for both non-polarized (purulence - p < 0.0001; healing - p < 0.01 ) and polarized treatment (purulence - p < 0.0001; healing - p < 0.0001) groups, but were not significantly different from each other. Histopathology and blood inflammation panel testing showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusion An HOCl-producing e-bandage reduced P. aeruginosa in wound biofilms, representing a potential antibiotic-free strategy for the treatment of recalcitrant wound infections. Disclosures Audrey N. Schuetz, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant

Abstract Aims As antimicrobial resistance is on the rise, treating chronic wound infections is becoming more complex. The presence of biofilms in wound beds contributes to this challenge. Here, the activity of a novel hypochlorous acid (HOCl) producing electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) against monospecies and dual-species bacterial biofilms formed by bacteria commonly found in wound infections was assessed. Methods and results The system was controlled by a wearable potentiostat powered by a 3V lithium-ion battery and maintaining a constant voltage of + 1.5V Ag/AgCl, allowing continuous generation of HOCl. A total of 19 monospecies and 10 dual-species bacterial biofilms grown on polycarbonate membranes placed on tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates were used as wound biofilm models, with HOCl producing e-bandages placed over the biofilms. Viable cell counts were quantified after e-bandages were continuously polarized for 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours. Time-dependent reductions in colony forming units (CFUs) were observed for all studied isolates. After 12 hours, average CFU reductions of 7.75 ± 1.37 and 7.74 ± 0.60 log10 CFU/cm2 were observed for monospecies and dual-species biofilms, respectively. Conclusions HOCl producing e-bandages reduce viable cell counts of in vitro monospecies and dual-species bacterial biofilms in a time-dependent manner in vitro. After 12 hours, >99.999% reduction in cell viability was observed for both monospecies and dual-species biofilms.

AbstractBiofilms formed by antibiotic‐resistant bacteria in wound beds challenge the treatment of wound infections. In this work, the activity of a novel electrochemical bandage (e‐bandage) composed of carbon fabric and controlled by a wearable potentiostat, designed to continuously deliver low amounts of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), is evaluated against methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug‐resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐PA) and mixed‐species (MRSA and MDR‐PA) wound infections. Wounds created on Swiss Webster mice are infected with the above‐named bacteria and biofilms allow to establish in wound beds for 3 days. e‐Bandages, which electrochemically reduce dissolved oxygen to H2O2 when polarized at −0.6 VAg/AgCl, are placed atop infected wound beds and polarized continuously for 48 h. Polarized e‐bandage treatment results in significant reductions (p <0.001) of both monospecies and mixed‐species wound infections. After e‐bandage treatment, electron microscopy shows degradation of bacterial cells, and histopathology shows no obvious alterations to the inflammatory host response. Blood biochemistries show no abnormalities. Taken all together, results of this work suggest that the described H2O2‐producing e‐bandage can reduce in vivo MRSA, MDR‐PA, and mixed‐species wound biofilms, and should be further developed as a potential antibiotic‐free strategy for treatment of wound infections.