Salvarani, Carlo

Abstract Therapy for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) varies widely in clinical practice as international recommendations for PMR treatment are not currently available. In this paper, we report the 2015 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations for the management of PMR. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology as a framework for the project. Accordingly, the direction and strength of the recommendations are based on the quality of evidence, the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patients’ and clinicians’ values and preferences, and resource use. Eight overarching principles and nine specific recommendations were developed covering several aspects of PMR, including basic and follow‐up investigations of patients under treatment, risk factor assessment, medical access for patients and specialist referral, treatment strategies such as initial glucocorticoid (GC) doses and subsequent tapering regimens, use of intramuscular GCs and disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), as well as the roles of non‐steroidal anti‐rheumatic drugs and non‐pharmacological interventions. These recommendations will inform primary, secondary and tertiary care physicians about an international consensus on the management of PMR. These recommendations should serve to inform clinicians about best practices in the care of patients with PMR.

Objective To describe the treatment and outcomes of patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis. Methods We retrospectively studied a cohort of 163 consecutive patients with primary CNS vasculitis who were seen at the Mayo Clinic over a 29‐year period. We analyzed treatments, treatment responses, and factors predictive of outcomes. Results A favorable response was observed in 85% of patients treated with prednisone alone and in 80% of patients treated with prednisone and cyclophosphamide. Relapses were observed in 27% of patients, and 25% of patients had discontinued therapy by the time of the last followup visit. Treatment with prednisone alone was associated with more frequent relapses (odds ratio [OR] 2.90), while large vessel involvement (OR 6.14) and cerebral infarcts at the time of diagnosis (OR 3.32) were associated with a poor response to treatment. Prominent gadolinium‐enhanced cerebral lesions or meninges were linked with continued treatment at the last followup encounter (OR 2.28). Higher disability scores at the last followup visit were associated with increasing age at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.44) and cerebral infarctions (OR 3.74), while lower disability scores were associated with gadolinium‐enhanced cerebral lesions or meninges (OR 0.35) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (OR 0.24). Increased mortality was associated with increasing age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39), diagnosis by angiography (HR 3.28), cerebral infarction (HR 4.44), and large vessel involvement (HR 4.98), while reduced mortality was associated with gadolinium‐enhanced cerebral lesions or meninges (HR 0.20). Conclusion The majority of patients with primary CNS vasculitis responded to treatment. Recognition of findings at diagnosis that predict the course or outcome may aid in decision‐making regarding therapy.

Abstract Objective Behçet's disease ( BD ) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory vascular disease with no pathognomonic test. Low sensitivity of the currently applied International Study Group ( ISG ) clinical diagnostic criteria led to their reassessment. Methods An International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for BD (from 27 countries) submitted data from 2556 clinically diagnosed BD patients and 1163 controls with BD ‐mimicking diseases or presenting at least one major BD sign. These were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Logistic regression, ‘leave‐one‐country‐out’ cross‐validation and clinical judgement were employed to develop new International Criteria for BD ( ICBD ) with the training data. Existing and new criteria were tested for their performance in the validation set. Results For the ICBD , ocular lesions, oral aphthosis and genital aphthosis are each assigned 2 points, while skin lesions, central nervous system involvement and vascular manifestations 1 point each. The pathergy test, when used, was assigned 1 point. A patient scoring ≥4 points is classified as having BD . In the training set, 93.9% sensitivity and 92.1% specificity were assessed compared with 81.2% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity for the ISG criteria. In the validation set, ICBD demonstrated an unbiased estimate of sensitivity of 94.8% (95% CI : 93.4–95.9%), considerably higher than that of the ISG criteria (85.0%). Specificity (90.5%, 95% CI : 87.9–92.8%) was lower than that of the ISG ‐criteria (96.0%), yet still reasonably high. For countries with at least 90%‐of‐cases and controls having a pathergy test, adding 1 point for pathergy test increased the estimate of sensitivity from 95.5% to 98.5%, while barely reducing specificity from 92.1% to 91.6%. Conclusion The new proposed criteria derived from multinational data exhibits much improved sensitivity over the ISG criteria while maintaining reasonable specificity. It is proposed that the ICBD criteria to be adopted both as a guide for diagnosis and classification of BD .