Allison, David B.

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Cellular senescence is a hallmark of several liver diseases, including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Senescent cholangiocytes exhibit a senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP), characterized by profibroinflammatory mediator release. Current cost‐effective biomarkers predicting disease progression, particularly for PSC, are limited and often lack mechanistic relevance. We sought to define a plasma biomarker signature for PSC and PBC. Methods Plasma from early‐ and late‐stage PSC and PBC, alcoholic liver disease (ALD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, and healthy controls was analyzed. Seventy‐one analytes were quantified using Luminex Multiplex Immunoassay or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Principal component analysis (PCA) identified key patterns. Findings from the PSC cohort were then applied to additional cohorts. Results Second principal component (PC2) (17 analytes, 17.1% variability) best separated PSC from controls. ANOVA showed significant differences in PC2 between early PSC vs. controls ( p = 0.0001), late PSC vs. controls ( p < 0.0001), and early vs. late PSC ( p < 0.0001). PC2 analytes also distinguished early PBC vs. controls ( p < 0.0332), late PBC ( p < 0.0001), and ALD ( p < 0.0001), and early vs. late PBC ( p < 0.0001), but not IBD vs. controls ( p = 0.119). Logistic regression using PC2 demonstrated strong discrimination of early‐ and late‐stage PSC (AUC = 0.86) and control vs. early‐stage PSC (AUC = 0.83). Conclusion This is the first study to define a plasma SASP biomarker signature associated with cholestatic liver disease. These analytes track disease stage and represent both mechanistic indicators and potential clinical trial endpoints.

ABSTRACT The senescent cell (SC) fate is linked to aging, multiple disorders and diseases, and physical dysfunction. Senolytics, agents that selectively eliminate 30%–70% of SCs, act by transiently disabling the senescent cell antiapoptotic pathways (SCAPs), which defend those SCs that are proapoptotic and pro‐inflammatory from their own senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Consistent with this, a JAK/STAT inhibitor, Ruxolitinib, which attenuates the pro‐inflammatory SASP of senescent human preadipocytes, caused them to become “senolytic‐resistant”. Administering senolytics to obese mice selectively decreased the abundance of the subset of SCs that is pro‐inflammatory. In cell cultures, the 30%–70% of human senescent preadipocytes or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) that are senolytic‐resistant (to Dasatinib or Quercetin, respectively) had increased p16 INK4a , p21 CIP1 , senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SAβgal), γH2AX, and proliferative arrest similarly to the total SC population (comprising senolytic‐sensitive plus‐resistant SCs). However, the SASP of senolytic‐resistant SCs entailed less pro‐inflammatory/apoptotic factor production, induced less inflammation in non‐senescent cells, and was equivalent or richer in growth/fibrotic factors. Senolytic‐resistant SCs released less mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and more highly expressed the anti‐inflammatory immune evasion signal, glycoprotein non‐melanoma‐B (GPNMB). Transplanting senolytic‐resistant SCs intraperitoneally into younger mice caused less physical dysfunction than transplanting the total SC population. Because Ruxolitinib attenuates SC release of proapoptotic SASP factors, while pathogen‐associated molecular pattern factors (PAMPs) can amplify the release of these factors rapidly (acting as “senosensitizers”), senolytic‐resistant and senolytic‐sensitive SCs appear to be interconvertible.

Abstract Single‐cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics enable unprecedented insight into cellular and molecular pathways implicated in human skin aging and regeneration. Senescent cells are individual cells that are irreversibly cell cycle arrested and can accumulate across the human lifespan due to cell‐intrinsic and ‐extrinsic stressors. With an atlas of single‐cell RNA‐sequencing and spatial transcriptomics, epidermal and dermal senescence and its effects were investigated, with a focus on melanocytes and fibroblasts. Photoaging due to ultraviolet light exposure was associated with higher burdens of senescent cells, a sign of biological aging, compared to chronological aging. A skin‐specific cellular senescence gene set, termed SenSkin™, was curated and confirmed to be elevated in the context of photoaging, chronological aging, and non‐replicating CDKN1A + (p21) cells. In the epidermis, senescent melanocytes were associated with elevated melanin synthesis, suggesting haphazard pigmentation, while in the dermis, senescent reticular dermal fibroblasts were associated with decreased collagen and elastic fiber synthesis. Spatial analysis revealed the tendency for senescent cells to cluster, particularly in photoaged skin. This work proposes a strategy for characterizing age‐related skin dysfunction through the lens of cellular senescence and suggests a role for senescent epidermal cells (i.e., melanocytes) and senescent dermal cells (i.e., reticular dermal fibroblasts) in age‐related skin sequelae.

Senescent cells exacerbate COVID-19 Cellular senescence is a state elicited in response to stress signals and is associated with a damaging secretory phenotype. The number of senescent cells increases with advanced age and this in turn drives age-related diseases. Camell et al. show that senescent cells have an amplified inflammatory response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (see the Perspective by Cox and Lord). This response is communicated to nonsenescent cells, suppressing viral defense mechanisms and increasing the expression of viral entry proteins. In old mice infected with a SARS-CoV-2–related virus, treatment with senolytics to reduce the senolytic cell burden reduced mortality and increased antiviral antibodies. Science , abe4832, this issue p. eabe4832 ; see also abi4474, p. 281

Abstract Cellular senescence is characterized by an irreversible cell cycle arrest and a pro‐inflammatory senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which is a major contributor to aging and age‐related diseases. Clearance of senescent cells has been shown to improve brain function in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases. However, it is still unknown whether senescent cell clearance alleviates cognitive dysfunction during the aging process. To investigate this, we first conducted single‐nuclei and single‐cell RNA‐seq in the hippocampus from young and aged mice. We observed an age‐dependent increase in p16 Ink4a senescent cells, which was more pronounced in microglia and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and characterized by a SASP. We then aged INK ‐ ATTAC mice, in which p16 Ink4a ‐positive senescent cells can be genetically eliminated upon treatment with the drug AP20187 and treated them either with AP20187 or with the senolytic cocktail Dasatinib and Quercetin. We observed that both strategies resulted in a decrease in p16 Ink4a exclusively in the microglial population, resulting in reduced microglial activation and reduced expression of SASP factors. Importantly, both approaches significantly improved cognitive function in aged mice. Our data provide proof‐of‐concept for senolytic interventions' being a potential therapeutic avenue for alleviating age‐associated cognitive impairment.