Cohen, M

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are prevalent valvular heart diseases associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional echocardiography faces limitations in availability, cost, consistency, and reliability, leading to misdiagnosis and undertreatment. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to echocardiographic scans has the potential to address these challenges. Methods This study evaluates the performance of an AI algorithm on an external population. The algorithm utilizes deep learning networks to analyze echocardiographic exams for diagnosing atrioventricular valve disorders. We tested the algorithm on transthoracic echocardiography data collected from a single center between 2013 and 2023. The model's performance was compared to ground truth values using two classification schemes: distinguishing between normal-mild and moderate-severe regurgitation, and categorizing results into four groups: normal, mild, moderate, and severe. Results The MR cohort included 280 patients, while the TR cohort comprised 298 patients. The model demonstrated a robust ability to identify clinically significant (moderate and above) atrioventricular valve regurgitation. The MR model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), with 91% accuracy, 95% sensitivity, and 89% specificity. In comparison, the TR model exhibited an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98), with 84% accuracy, 91% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. Conclusion The model demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and reliability in assessing atrioventricular valve regurgitation severity, highlighting its potential as a valuable clinical tool. The findings underscore the role of AI in complementing expert evaluations and improving access to effective diagnostics, with future applications potentially including point-of-care diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression.

Abstract Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The current gold-standard comprehensive assessment of CMD is through a limited-access invasive catheterization lab procedure. Purposes We aimed to develop a point-of-care tool to assist clinical guidance in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal functional stress test and with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) based on demographic data and resting ECG waveforms. Methods This study included 1,893 NOCAD patients (<50% angiographic stenosis) who underwent CMD evaluation as well as a standard ECG up to 1 year prior. Microvascular endothelial-independent dysfunction was defined by abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR) <2.5 in response to intracoronary adenosine administration. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined by a maximal percent increase in coronary blood flow (%ΔCBF) ≤50% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. We trained algorithms to distinguish between the following outcomes: CFR ≤2.5, ΔCBF (%) ≤50, and the combination of both. Two classes of algorithms were trained, one depending on ECG waveforms as input, and another using tabular style clinical data. The optimal classification threshold was determined by maximizing Youden's J. Results Mean age was 51±12 years and 66% were females (n=1,257). AUC values ranged from 0.49 to 0.67 for all the outcomes. The best performance in our analysis was for the outcome CFR ≤2.5 via logistic regression on tabular variables. AUC and accuracy were 0.67 and 60%; while sensitivity and NPV were 70% and 85%. Specificity and PPV were 56% and 0.35%. When decreasing the threshold from the “optimal” one (24%) to 15%, sensitivity and NPV increased to 92% and 90% respectively, while specificity and PPV decreased to 25% and 29% respectively (Figure 2). Conclusion An AI-enabled algorithm may be able to assist clinical guidance by ruling out CMD in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal functional stress test. This algorithm needs to be prospectively validated in different cohorts. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The James Nutter Family & Maria Long Family Fellowship in Cardiovascular Research and Mayo Clinic Figure 1Figure 2

Abstract Background An Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled algorithm can provide an age estimate from a single standard resting ECG. The gap between AI-estimated age (ECG age) and chronological age (Age-Gap) has been associated with total and cardiovascular mortality. We hypothesized that coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED), an early feature of coronary atherosclerosis, is associated with physiological aging, as measured by ECG age. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the association of CED, a potential index of cardiac aging, and AI-estimated physiological aging. Methods 1902 patients with signs and/or symptoms of ischemia and with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (<40% angiographic stenosis) who underwent functional coronary angiography with intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine (Ach) infusions and a resting ECG within one year were included in this analysis. CED was defined as coronary artery constriction [%ΔCoronary artery diameter (CAD) <0] in response to IC Ach. Patients were categorized as CED+ or CED−. The ECG age were calculated by a previously-trained AI algorithm that was built using the Keras framework with Tensorflow backend and Python. The association between ECG-age and Age-Gap, with CED was investigated. Results Average chronological age was 50.9±12.5, ECG age was 54.1±11.6, 1261 (66%) were females. Compared to CED−, the CED+ group had more males and hyperlipidaemia (p<0.05 for both). Age-gap was significantly higher in patients with CED+ (Fig. A). Multiple regression analysis showed that CED+ was associated with Age-gap (standardized β [sβ] coefficient = 0.08, P=0.001) even after adjustment for chronological age (sβ coefficient = 0.07, P=0.001), and even after adjusting for other cardiovascular risk factors like gender and obesity (sβ coefficient = 0.07, P<0.0001). Furthermore, there is a significant gradual increase in vasoconstriction, in response to IC Ach, with increasing Age-gap (Fig. B). Conclusion Abnormal coronary endothelial function is associated with an increased AI-estimated age which could indicate a higher physiological age. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms enabled the detection of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) from a single normal sinus rhythm (NSR) ECG. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a precursor for coronary artery disease, which is a known risk factor for AF. Purpose The aim of this study is to examine the probability of PAF, according to AI-enabled algorithm estimation, in patients with CMD. Methods 1858 patients without persistent atrial fibrillation with signs and/or symptoms of ischemia and with non-obstructive CAD (<40% stenosis) who underwent invasive coronary microvascular functional assessment and the ECG closest to the functional assessment were included in this analysis. Patients with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) <2 in response to adenosine were labelled as endothelial-independent CMD; % increase in coronary blood flow (%ΔCBF) <50% in response to acetylcholine were labelled as endothelial-dependent CMD. Patients were categorized into 4 groups. G1: Normal (NL) CFR/NL %ΔCBF; G2: Abnormal (ABN) %ΔCBF only; G3: ABN CFR only; G4: ABL CFR & %ΔCBF. The probability of having PAF (%probAF) was calculated by a previously-trained and validated AI algorithm. AF Flag = %probAF >9%; which is a pre-set cut-off found to have the highest accuracy of identifying patients with PAF (Area Under the Curve = 0.87). Results Mean age for patients was 51.2±12.4 and 66.3% were females. 835 (45%) were in G1, 39 (2%) in G2, 911 (49%) in G3, and 73 (4%) in G4. Compared to G1 and G2, G3 and G4 were older, had more diabetes and higher smoking rates (p<0.05 for all). Furthermore, G4 had a significantly higher %probAF compared to other groups (Fig. 1). G4 were also more likely to be flagged by the algorithm as having PAF, even after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, with an odds ratio of 1.9 [CI 95% 1.1–3.3; p=0.03]) (Fig. 2). Conclusion Patients with combined CMD have a significantly higher probability of having PAF based on an AI-enabled algorithm. Further research is warranted to know if patients with CMD would benefit from formal AF screening at the time of diagnosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None